City Council Jun 18, 2024
City Council Meeting Summary
Time | Item | Item Summary | Motion Summary | Comment Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|
00:00:08 | None: None | Mayor Sobieski announced the commencement of the meeting held on June 18, 2024, at the council chambers located at 420 Little Street. The meeting is accessible to staff and the public via Zoom and is being broadcast live on the city's website and cable TV channel 27. | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
00:00:29 | I: CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL - 5:30 PM | The meeting was called to order. The City Clerk noted that Councilmember Blastine would be late, arriving shortly after 7 o'clock (00:00:29). Roll call was taken, with Councilmember Blastine absent, Councilmember Hoffman present, Councilmember Kelman present, Vice Mayor Cox present, and Mayor Sobieski present (00:00:41). | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
00:00:53 | II.: INTERVIEWS FOR PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION | The City Council conducted interviews for the Parks & Recreation Commission. Seven candidates were interviewed: James Kavanaugh, Stacey Cray, Sonia Saltzman, Danielle Kenan, Avalon Johnson, Karina Hughes, Michelle McCullough, and Frank Millian. Each candidate was given a few minutes to introduce themselves and explain their interest in serving on the commission. Councilmembers then asked questions about their qualifications, experience, and ideas for improving parks and recreation in Sausalito. James Kavanaugh, who has worked in the city since 1979, expressed interest in building a community center at the MLK campus (00:04:26). Councilmember Kellerman inquired about his community center idea and other possible existing solutions. (00:04:02). Councilmember Cox asked about his prior involvement with the park and rec commission (00:05:43). Stacey Cray, a singer-songwriter, expressed interest in bringing musical theater to Sausalito and improving public spaces (00:07:54). A councilmember asked how to bring live performance to Sausalito (00:09:28). Cox asked about her familiarity with the Sausalito Center for the Arts (00:10:32). Sonia Saltzman, a senior program coordinator, emphasized creating inclusive spaces and making Sausalito more ADA accessible (00:11:11). Kellerman asked about her experience coordinating events (00:12:32). Cox noted her involvement with Marin Women's PAC (00:13:35). A councilmember asked about her youth outreach and connections to the school district (00:14:24). Danielle Kenan, a graphic designer, spoke about her involvement with the Sausalito Cruising Club and her passion for preserving Sausalito's history (00:15:57). A councilmember asked what she would do on the commission (00:17:13). Kellerman asked about her plans for "Keep Sausalito Salty" (00:18:01). Avalon Johnson, an avid sports enthusiast, suggested adding outdoor exercise facilities in parks (00:21:19). A councilmember inquired about capitalizing on Sausalito's aquatic activities (00:22:29). Karina Hughes discussed her involvement with Sausalito Beautiful and her background in branding and marketing (00:25:12). Kellerman asked about specific events or projects she would spearhead (00:27:36). Michelle McCullough, an entrepreneur, shared her interest in bringing film to Sausalito and her experience with event production (00:31:21). Kellerman asked about bringing the International Latino Film Festival to Sausalito (00:33:21). Cox thanked her for her participation in the teaching series (00:34:20). Frank Millian, a retired aviation professional and active sportsman, offered his perspective on expanding pickleball courts (00:35:02). Kellerman asked about building a pickleball reputation in Southern Marin and potential revenue generation (00:36:35). The council thanked all the candidates for their interest and commitment to the community, noting that the actual appointments would be made at a later meeting (00:06:36). Stella Benton was not able to make her interview time. | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
00:39:07 | III: ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION | The council adjourned to a closed session and indicated that the public meeting would resume at 7 p.m. (00:39:23). An announcement was made that Councilmember Blasdain would be late, and that there were no announcements from the closed session. The meeting would begin with the Pledge of Allegiance. | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
00:39:28 | IV: RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION - 7:00 PM | The meeting is reconvening to an open session at 7:00 PM. | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
00:40:00 | 1: SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS/MAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS | The meeting began with announcements, including the recognition of Jim Hook as the Grand Marshal for the 4th of July Parade due to his long-standing contributions to Sausalito, including his work with the Lighted Boat Parade, Sausalito Yacht Club, Chamber of Commerce, and Art Festival (00:40:18). Reason Bradley then provided an update on the Sea Lion sculpture reinstallation project (00:41:33). He detailed the restoration process, which included addressing corrosion and electrolysis issues to ensure the sculpture's longevity (00:42:00). The project also involved a complex permitting process and innovative construction methods, such as using non-conductive materials to prevent future damage (00:42:50). The pressure washing and drilling of the rocks for rebar are scheduled for the 24th and 25th of the month, with the sea lion potentially being placed back on the pedestal by July 1st (00:43:40). Mary Hudson from the Sausalito Foundation, added that the community has been hugely supportive, having raised enough funds to take care of the restoration and the installation (00:45:25). She acknowledged the support of the city staff and announced a celebration event at the Trident restaurant on July 17th (00:46:34). The Mayor reported that a complaint filed against them regarding a conflict of interest related to the Business Improvement District was rejected by the FPPC (00:47:21). A discussion then ensued regarding a motion to continue item 5C to the first meeting in July, with disagreement among councilmembers and the city attorney regarding the proper timing of the motion (00:48:10). | No Motion | 1 Total: 1 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
00:45:25 Mary Hudson was In Favor: Mary Hudson, from the Sausalito Foundation, discussed the community's support for the Sea Lion restoration project. The community has raised enough funds to take care of the restoration and the installation, and also to establish long-term maintenance. She mentioned an upcoming celebration at the Trident restaurant on July 17 to commemorate the reinstallation.
|
||||
00:52:13 | 2: ACTION MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING | The council considered the minutes from the June 4th, 2024 City Council meeting. The mayor opened the floor for public comment, first in person and then online, but there were no public comments. A councilmember made a motion to approve the minutes, which was seconded. With no further discussion, the council voted in favor of approving the minutes. | Motion to approve the minutes from the June 4th, 2024 City Council meeting, seconded and passed (00:52:36). | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
00:52:46 | 3: CONSENT CALENDAR | The council is considering the consent calendar, which includes routine and non-controversial items. The items include proclamations for June 10th National Freedom Day, Gun Violence Awareness Day, and Alzheimer's Brain Awareness Month; the reappointment of Andrew Junius to the Planning Commission; waiving the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 3-2024 regarding sewer service fees; adopting a resolution authorizing the city manager to award a construction contract to Mars Construction for the Johnson Street tenant improvement project; and receiving and filing the employee retention recruitment update. Councilman Hoffman raised concerns about the reappointment process for Andrew Junius (00:54:32). He noted inaccuracies in the staff report and questioned whether the position was properly noticed as open for applications (00:55:58). Mayor Sobieski clarified that the city website continually receives applications and there was no specific opening period (00:56:09). Councilman Hoffman requested clarification on the process for reappointments to ensure fairness and transparency (00:57:41). He requested that item 3D be pulled from the consent calendar and properly noticed (00:59:53). The council agreed to move item 3D to the business agenda (01:00:13). Vice Mayor Cox questioned the large contingency amount for the Mars construction contract (01:04:29), which was addressed by Director McGowan (01:05:06). | Motion to approve consent items 3A through 3C and 3E through 3G, excluding 3D (01:12:12). The motion was seconded (01:12:21) and passed. | 5 Total: 3 In Favor 0 Against 2 Neutral |
01:05:55 Jeff Jacobs was Neutral: Suggested renaming Juneteenth to Jubilee and spoke about the meaning of Jubilee in relation to freedom and forgiveness.
01:08:08 Bet MacDougall was Neutral: Reserved comments for later, understanding that comments on Mr. Junius's item would be reserved for the business item. 01:08:38 Sybil Boutillier was In Favor: Expressed appreciation for the Alzheimer's and Brain Awareness Month proclamation and highlighted the need for more support services for the elder community in Marin, including adult daycare and residential care. 01:10:19 Scott Thornburg was In Favor: Congratulated the city manager on the staff report, particularly the staff churn numbers, and urged the council to avoid staff cuts during budget discussions. 01:11:22 Sandra Bushmuth was In Favor: Thanked the council for the Alzheimer's proclamation, endorsed Sybil's comments on the need for further care in the area, and hoped to raise consciousness about the issue in Sausalito. |
||||
01:12:54 | 3.D: Re-Appointment of Andrew Junius to the Planning Commission for a 3-year Term, commencing on July 1, 2024, and Ending on June 30, 2027 | Councilmember Hoffman expressed concerns regarding the process for reappointing members to the Planning Commission, noting a deficiency in the current process and emphasizing the need for proper noticing and solicitation of applications. (01:13:20) Vice Mayor Cox clarified that the intent was not to automatically reappoint without consideration, but to open up the application process while inviting the existing holder to reapply. (01:13:40) Hoffman requested this summary be highlighted in the minutes to ensure consistent application of the process going forward. (01:14:18) Council discussed whether to proceed with the reappointment immediately or postpone it to the next agenda. (01:14:53) The city attorney advised against appointing other individuals under the current agenda item's scope and suggested appointing Andrew Junius for a fixed term until the matter is properly addressed. (01:15:53) Councilmember Blaustein was fine with the proposal and understood that it was previously discussed. (01:17:07) Councilmember Kellerman agreed with the Vice Mayor's statements. (01:17:26) | Motion by Vice Mayor Cox to move item 3D to the consent calendar for the July 16 meeting, that the city clerk advertise the opening coming up on the Planning Commission, that he distribute to the City Council any applications received, and that they hold interviews the evening of July 16 in advance of the regular meeting, and that they reappoint Andrew Junius as a Planning Commissioner for the period commencing with July 1, the termination of his term, to July 16 July 17 2024. Seconded by Councilmember Kellerman. (01:22:13) | 3 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 3 Neutral |
01:17:49 Michael Rex was Neutral: Michael Rex, a local architect, emphasized the importance of the planning commissioner role and advocated for open advertisement of the position upon term expiration rather than automatic continuation. He suggested continuing Andrew Junius on a temporary basis pending interviews. (01:17:49)
01:19:21 McDougall was Neutral: McDougall thanked the city attorney for their conservative advice. (01:19:21) McDougall critiqued past meeting conduct and asserted a precedent was set with Ms. Feller's reappointment where other candidates weren't considered. (01:20:25) 01:21:04 Andrew Junius was Neutral: Andrew Junius expressed agreement with standard procedures, including noticing the position and allowing interested parties to apply. He stated he had requested the city clerk to do so a month prior and believed it had happened. (01:21:04) |
||||
01:23:39 | 5.A: Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Review | The City Manager began the presentation by thanking the finance director and city departments for their work on the draft budget, emphasizing that budgets reflect a city's values, which in Sausalito are safety, infrastructure, and quality of life. He noted improvements in audit findings over the past three years and acknowledged the contributions of prior councils and administrations to Sausalito's strong financial model. Key achievements before 2021 included implementing a tourism and occupancy tax, passing Measure O, and early adoption of Section 115 trusts, which create a path to dealing with pension challenges. The city maintained service levels throughout the pandemic. Sausalito expanded measure O to measure L to create 8 years of revenue for infrastructure. A new independent auditor was hired, Bedowian Associates. Councilmember Hoffman and former Mayor Withey were involved with budget conversations. Grant receipts are not where the council would like them to be and an analysis was done of that issue. Departments will meet to build ideas that would create revenue or create efficiency or save money. Chad Hess presented an overview of the fiscal year 2025 budget, defining key terms like budget surplus, deficit, fund balance, and reserves. He took ownership for making a mistake that led to a $2 million deficit. He then presented a reworked slide, and the updated slide deck was requested to be updated for members of the public and council. OPEB and pension liabilities have increased, requiring higher payments. The city plans to participate in PRISM GL1 with a $500,000 SIR. New information is available regarding property insurance from PRISM, offering a more favorable quote than Hub. He notes Labor Code Section 4850, concerning salary payments for injured public safety officers. He also addressed sales tax softening and a reduction from a significant sales tax contributor. He then presented available options and discussed with council which workman's comp plan they would like to select, noting the risk appetite. He updated general fund expenses, including increases for the finance department and public works, and a decrease in planning and zoning. Staff discussed Sausalito turnover rate and its costs. He updated the slide with Sausalito Turnover Rate. The City Manager stated that she was told that grant receipts are not where the council would like them to be. She also stated that whenever you see a deficit, it's not the city manager's problem, it's our problem as an organization. Councilmembers asked questions about the new budget and the proposed insurance plans. | Motion to direct the city manager to maintain levels of service, following up on the vice mayor’s suggestion to present at the next special city council meeting, some information about whether to slow down hiring, and to adopt the recommended 25% reserve policy (02:46:49). | 2 Total: 1 In Favor 0 Against 1 Neutral |
02:44:55 Peter Van Meter was In Favor: Strongly endorsed the city manager's recommendation to use unassigned funds to transition through the insurance problem, maintain full staffing and city services, and deploy available funds.
02:45:41 Babette McDougall was Neutral: Commented on the city's real estate portfolio, questioning why fiduciary agents would ever trade it. |
||||
03:02:39 | 5.B: Infrastructure Renewal and Sustainability Program Update/Study Session | Katie Thau Garcia, the city's resiliency and sustainability manager, introduced Climatech, represented by Tyler Gerben and Bern Carter, to present an update on the Infrastructure Renewal and Sustainability Program. The program aims to address infrastructure needs, promote sustainability, and provide budgetary relief using innovative funding solutions and smart city technologies. The presentation covered the process to date, including the competitive selection of Climatech, legal review of the agreement, and a comprehensive energy and water assessment across city sites. The assessment identified key areas for improvement, such as City Hall, MLK, and the police station, focusing on energy-consuming systems like HVAC, lighting, and windows. Climatech proposed a bundle of initial phase projects, including LED lighting modernization, HVAC replacements, building automation, City Hall window upgrades, and smart city/parking enhancements. They also suggested solar PV installations at City Hall, MLK, and the police station, along with EV charging infrastructure. The proposed program aims to achieve significant cost savings, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improve staff efficiency, with funding potentially coming from various sources, including the Inflation Reduction Act and PG&E on-bill financing. The next steps include obtaining feedback from the council, conducting a detailed engineering assessment, and presenting to the Sustainability Commission before potential council consideration in September or October. The presentation highlighted the potential for $7.5 million in savings and a substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Councilmembers asked questions about funding sources, grant opportunities, and the possibility of itemizing projects by building to align with existing business enterprise funds and capital improvement plans. (03:04:41) Katie Thau Garcia introduced Climatech. (03:06:50) Tyler Gerben of Climatech discussed objectives to improve infrastructure, hedge against utility escalations, expedite greenhouse gas reductions, and enhance smart city initiatives. (03:09:00) Tyler Gerben noted that the city spends $442,000 annually on utilities. (03:17:50) Tyler Gerben described the current solar system on City Hall as 20% inefficient and recommended upgrading it and making city hall the first net-zero energy site. (03:19:38) Tyler Gerben mentioned the possibility of $400,000 in grant money from the Inflation Reduction Act. (03:21:23) Tyler Gerben reported the low hanging fruit program could accomplish about 80% of the greenhouse gas emissions the city uses annually. | No Motion | 1 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 1 Neutral |
03:34:03 Babette McDougall was Neutral: McDougall expressed concern about the feasibility of the presented solutions for Sausalito and questioned the integration of the project with the existing sustainability team. She emphasized the need to aggregate efforts and ensure relevance to Sausalito's specific context.
|
||||
03:37:39 | 5.C: Discussion and Direction to Staff Regarding Marinship Blue Economy Innovation District Initiative | Councilmember Hoffman recused himself due to a property conflict of interest. The City Manager stated that the item was brought forward at Councilmember Hoffman's request. The attorney for the initiative, Mark Wolf, submitted the initiative information, but there has been little staff analysis due to a lack of direction from the council. The City Manager recommended that the council provide direction to staff without a staff report, as they are not prepared to provide one. The Mayor inquired about the origin of the initiative and whether it had been reviewed by any city commissions, to which the City Manager responded that it came from Mark Wolf and had not been reviewed by any commissions. The City Attorney explained the process for placing an item on the ballot, including gathering signatures and the council's options to either place the measure on the ballot or adopt it outright. The City Attorney clarified the steps required to place the measure on the ballot, including a resolution and CEQA compliance, with a deadline of August 9th. Councilmember Cox clarified that the city council can place an initiative on the ballot without gathering signatures. Councilmember Blaustein reviewed the time and money spent on the General Plan and Housing Element Advisory Committees, highlighting the extensive public engagement involved in those processes and contrasted this with the potential lack of public engagement for a ballot initiative. Councilmember Kellerman requested that the council move on to public comment to allow the public to be heard. | Councilmember Kellerman made a motion to continue the item to July 16th, but it did not carry. (05:14:42) | 29 Total: 9 In Favor 16 Against 4 Neutral |
03:55:21 Babette McDougall was Neutral: Applauded the council for coming closer to real democracy and emphasized the need to focus on the bottom-line question and be flexible and move forward with creative thinking.
03:57:05 Bruce Hoffman was Against: Highlighted that most property owners in the Marinship are longstanding families who contribute to the city and its nonprofits. He expressed concern that the initiative is a major stab in the back to these families and would result in an economic catastrophe. 03:59:21 Casey Peterson was Against: Identified herself as a third-generation operator at Clipper Yacht Harbor and stated that the initiative does not represent Clipper or its tenants' needs. She expressed concern about the lack of community input and requested that the council dismiss the initiative. 04:01:41 Michael Rex was Against: Spoke on behalf of the Richardson Bay Maritime Association (RBMA) and stated that the RBMA shares the Sausalito Working Waterfront Coalition's intent to promote and preserve the industrial, marine, and art uses in the Marinship. However, the RBMA believes putting the initiative on the November ballot is premature because its impacts have not been fully identified and broader dialogue is needed. 04:03:55 Mary Griffin was Against: Expressed concern that the initiative came out of left field and urged the council not to vote to put it on the ballot for the November elections. She stated that the authors of the initiative should gather signatures like other sponsors and that the initiative needs more community input and coordination with other projects. 04:04:46 Sophia Collier was Against: Urged caution and highlighted the need for CEQA compliance to avoid lawsuits. She also expressed concern that the initiative sends the wrong message to the state of California and suggested that the proponents gather signatures to remove risk from the city council. 04:06:33 Jacqueline Amaricus was In Favor: Stated that there are two ways for voters to approve the measure: by the city council putting it on the ballot or by gathering signatures. She said that the public does have a voice and the council is at no risk in deciding whether they want to put it on the ballot. She feels that the council should put this on the ballot. 04:08:48 Adrian Brenton was Against: Expressed concern about the lack of transparency and the broken process, stating that it is a winner-take-all situation. He urged the council to put it out to signatures and stated that the initiative is driving a huge wedge into the community. 04:10:19 Curtis Havill was Against: Stated that the initiative has not been vetted through a transparent process and that the community has not had meaningful input. He requested a seat at the table and suggested using the 2010 Waterfront and Marinship Steering Committee document as a starting point for community conversation. 04:12:45 Craig Merrilees was In Favor: Acknowledged the differing views and stated that the Working Waterfront Coalition is gathering feedback and specific suggestions. He stated that maritime businesses and artists are being squeezed out due to rising lease rates and that the coalition will continue to work on this and be open. 04:14:56 Mark Wolf was In Favor: Explained that there are two ways to put something on the ballot: gather signatures or persuade the council to do it. He stated that gathering signatures ensures that there will be a vote of the people and a thorough vetting of the issue. 04:17:09 John DeRay was In Favor: Stated that the marinship is at risk due to noncompliant uses and conversion of industrial space to office, resulting in high lease rates. The ballot measure aims to foster and grow what remains of the industrial maritime and art activities by codifying the general plan. The measure does not cover 18 acres along Bridgeway and allows current uses to remain. He asked to let the voters decide. 04:19:20 Sharna Brockett was Against: Urged the council not to bring the initiative back in July when many people are on vacation and stated that 45 days is not sufficient to create a master plan and do proper land use planning. She called for a meaningful working group with major stakeholders and stated that some businesses supporting the initiative may not be aware of its limitations. 04:21:35 Alice Merrill was In Favor: Expressed concern that the marinship-specific plan is no longer part of the general plan because landowners don't want those restrictions. She stated that the RBMA would be great to be involved in this and emphasized the need to work together. 04:23:54 Riley Tobberg was Against: Shared a story about a monk and emphasized the need for a collaborative effort with everyone together to solve the issue, stating that it is not going to solve in 45 days. He asked to not move this forward. 04:26:00 Doreen Gunnar was Against: Stated that the problem with the measure is that it is a measure and that land use is so complicated. She said that the decision to make land use decisions through a ballot is not appropriate. She recalled that the council had a similar conversation around the cannabis issues last go around when these measures popped up and they came to the conclusion that it was really a difficult thing to do because there's nothing you can do to it if it gets passed. 04:28:13 Rupert Hanson was Against: Stated that Silver Seas Yachts was not aware of this at all, even though is one of the largest yacht brokers in the Marinship. He argued that the measure's language that yacht brokers aren't necessary to be by the water is false and passing in its current form will displace the entire network. 04:30:31 Lee Hunt was Against: Stated that their business (Modern Sailing School) is a maritime ecosystem business because its success aids the success of other businesses such as Lisp Marine and Spalding. Therefore, the council is urged to not legislate restriction and exclusion, but empower the community to build a better ecosystem. 04:32:18 Gabe Turner was Against: Stated that future companies are likely going to be created in places like Township. The very measure speaks of an ocean tech accelerator they know and it used to hold its events in Township. If this measure passed, the township wouldn't be able to exist in the Marineship. The council was urged to not pass it and not to rush it in 45 days. 04:34:21 Peter Van Meter was Against: The council should not be a party to putting any measure on a ballot, whether sponsored or if comes to them already with signatures. It becomes impossible to overturn because it has to go to a public vote, plus a lot of initiatives say that the government is not allowed to make modifications at all. Do not take any action on this, ever. Let the group go get the signatures and let it go to a vote. 04:36:12 Lauren Dreamer was In Favor: It's maddening that this had to come from the Working Waterfront Coalition. It's a step in the right direction and the type of thing that must be protected. Zoning is tired and does little for this place. Let's talk about fixing it and not developing it, but talk about how we can invest in it. It must be decided by the people of Sausalito, too. They need to trust each other. 04:38:21 William Foss was Neutral: There are fewer commercial fishing boats in Clipper from when he had opened the Fish restaurant. Climatic events are making the lives of the fisherman extremely hard right now, they just can't survive. They were not consulted at all. The fishermen should always be remembered because they work harder than anyone and they are completely unrepresented here. 04:40:00 John Coletti was Neutral: The comments were good and are representative of good discussion and conversations of the community. Due to the lack of direction given for the Marineship, it was a shame to watch the petty politics that some of the council were playing out earlier. He urges direction to modify the initiative and maybe present it further for this or a coming election. 04:41:22 Sammy was In Favor: Sausalito should not thrive to be the other towns but we should keep thriving to be unique. Let's nurture the vitality and increase the revenue for the city. This should go to vote. 04:43:35 Kieran Culligan was Against: Legislative restriction is not what should be followed. Show me the financial models. Show me the letters of intent. 45 days is not enough. I've never seen a measure like this designed to promote innovation. 04:45:27 Speaker 25 was In Favor: The two ways for any ballot initiative to be presented are great. Having signatures is great. There should be an opportunity for all residents to have an actual vote and say on any initiative so that it is not just left up to the people in front. We need to allow the people to have a chance to actually vote on something. 04:46:43 Scott Thornburg was Neutral: From an EDAC perspective and from a personal one, what is missing is economic impact and also there has not been the proper opportunity for the Blue Economy and Innovation Subcommittee to weigh in on this measure. It's been robust and encouraging to have such a good showing and discussion tonight, however. Time and thought needs to be given to get the process done in a manner that protects the working waterfront. 04:48:37 Sandra Bushmuth was In Favor: What better way to prove democracy than to let the voters vote? The city council can modify the general plan 4x a year but it's with public hearing. So the notion of having an initiative that allows the people of Sausalito to make a land use decision to me is a great thing. Get all details decided then take it to the people. 04:49:42 Charles Meltzen was Against: Expresses appreciation for the robust conversation and dialogue, emphasizes the vital importance of the Marinship to the community, and stresses the need to get this done right. Stresses the importance of democracy is the people have right to vote, but it must be right and the city council has a duty to do that. All large initiatives have taken more than 45 days and we should make everyone involved in this. |
||||
05:20:12 | 5.D: Receive and File Report Regarding Becoming a Charter City; Provide Direction to Staff Regarding Becoming a Charter City | The council is considering receiving and filing a report regarding becoming a charter city. The item will be continued to a future agenda, but public comments will still be heard. | No Motion | 1 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 1 Neutral |
05:21:19 | 5.E: Consider Appointments to the Parks & Recreation Commission | The council is appointing five members to the Parks & Recreation Commission and discussing the process of selecting the candidates. Councilmember Cox suggests a slate of candidates: Sonia Salzman, Danielle Keenan, Karina Hughes, Michelle Mokala, and Frank Millian (05:22:24). Councilmember Hoffman suggests Stacy Craig as an alternate (05:24:09). Ultimately, the council agrees to appoint the proposed slate and Stacy Craig as an alternate (05:24:25). Councilmember Cox notes the difficulty in choosing only five candidates due to the high quality of all interviewees (05:23:53). | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
05:24:34 | 5.F: Introduction and Waiver of First Reading of Ordinance No. -04 - 2024 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Sausalito Amending Sausalito Municipal Code Section 2.58.040 Relating to Residency Requirements on City Boards, Commissions, and Commi | This agenda item concerns the introduction and potential waiver of the first reading of Ordinance 424, which relates to residency requirements for city boards, commissions, and committees. Councilmember Cox moved to continue the item, but wanted to hear public comment first. (05:24:53) | Councilmember Cox moved to continue this item. (05:24:53) | 2 Total: 1 In Favor 1 Against 0 Neutral |
05:25:09 Robert M. McDougall was Against: McDougall is against a broad residency requirement, stating that it's not in the best interest of Sausalito. He believes that the council should carefully consider exceptions, such as for business owners who have operated in Sausalito for a long time, even if they don't live there. He feels that residency matters, but blanket rules are not the answer.
05:26:07 Scott Thornburg was In Favor: Thornburg believes that many businesses would like to contribute to the city. He suggests that allowing business owners who don't live in town but have had businesses in Sausalito for many years to serve on boards and commissions is a great way to engage them. He agrees with the previous speaker that there should be some qualifications around that, but that the city should be careful not to be too restrictive. |
||||
05:27:21 | 6: COMMUNICATIONS | This agenda item appears to be a continuation of previous discussions. McDougall raises concerns about a risk assessment and how that might be influencing filling a position (05:28:07). He also suggests alternative locations, specifically the cruising club or the Bay Model, for meetings concerning marine ships, rather than the Spinnaker (05:28:22). He emphasizes the importance of capitalizing on current discussions and involving citizens in the marineship issue (05:29:24). | No Motion | 2 Total: 1 In Favor 0 Against 1 Neutral |
05:27:42 McDougall was Neutral: McDougall discusses a risk assessment phone call he received following the last council meeting from a compliance officer. He expresses concerns about the location of marine ship discussions, suggesting the cruising club or Bay model instead of the Spinnaker. He also stresses the importance of including citizens in meetings and special hearings about the marineship issue.
05:29:47 Alice Merrill was In Favor: Alice Merrill expresses concern that people in other parts of the city are not aware of Marinship. She suggests ways to get people down there, like an all-city potluck or a day for business owners to explore the area (05:30:31). She emphasizes the need to get the rest of the town to care about Marinship, rather than creating a divide between landowners and renters (05:30:50). |
||||
05:31:17 | 7: COUNCILMEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS | This agenda item is for councilmember committee reports. Councilmember Cox reports on attending the Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee meeting, noting that the PBAC is pursuing grant funding opportunities and will recommend that the City Council consider adopting a plan by Parametrics for avoiding accidents at high-risk intersections (05:31:24). These items may come before the council in July or early fall. Councilmember Kellerman announces that the North Bay Division of CalCities will be hosted in Sausalito on July 25th, at Spinnaker, and all councilmembers are invited (05:32:10). | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
05:32:30 | 8: CITY MANAGER REPORTS & OTHER COUNCIL BUSINESS | The meeting is expected to break for lunch around noon. (05:32:30) | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
05:32:32 | 18: City Manager’s Quarterly Report | The City Manager presented a robust quarterly report compiled by intern Libby Hughes. The report contains information from different departments. Libby Hughes will also be working on an evaluation of the stairways and the condition of stairways, and also work related to Bridgeway and the clutter on Bridgeway. | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
||||
05:33:17 | 8B: Future Agenda Items | Councilmembers discussed future agenda items. Councilmember Cox commended the city manager for her impressive report and work. Councilmember Blaustein reiterated her request for a robust conversation about disaster preparedness, including a presentation from the emergency manager and more tabletop exercises (05:33:40). She emphasized the importance of including it on the next agenda setting. Councilmember Cox asked if the city clerk records future agenda items suggested by councilmembers (05:34:13). The Mayor confirmed that the city clerk does record the items and includes them on the future agenda sheet for the agenda setting meeting (05:34:18). Councilmember Cox requested to be emailed the list with the matrix every time the agenda setting committee meets (05:34:27). | No Motion | 1 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 1 Neutral |
05:35:37 | 9: ADJOURNMENT | The meeting is adjourned, and the next city council meeting is scheduled. There was a correction to the date and time of the next meeting. It will be a special city council meeting to approve and adopt the budget, and it will be held one week from today at 6 p.m. (05:35:55). | No Motion | 0 Total: 0 In Favor 0 Against 0 Neutral |
|
City Council Meeting Transcript
Time | Speaker | Text |
---|---|---|
00:00:08.92 | Mayor Sobieski | Mayor Sobieski and council members. This meeting of June 18, 2024 is being held in council chambers located at 420 Little Street. Staff members and members of the public are also participating through Zoom. This meeting is being broadcast live on the city's website and on cable TV channel 27. |
00:00:29.00 | Unknown | Thank you, City Clerk. Councilmember Blastine has informed me that she is going to be late for the closed session. She probably will actually be a few minutes late even for the open session, but should be arriving shortly after 7 o'clock. Could you go ahead and please call the roll? |
00:00:41.95 | Mayor Sobieski | Councilmember Blasin, as Mary Sobieski noted, she'll be here later. Councilmember Hoffman. Councilmember Kelman. Here. |
00:00:49.96 | Mayor Sobieski | Vice Mayor Cox. Here. And Mayor Sobieski. Here. |
00:00:52.83 | Unknown | here. |
00:00:53.42 | Unknown | Thank you very much, city clerk. We're going to go ahead and have the first item be interviews for the Park and Recreation Commission. Thanks to everyone who is here and we will begin with James Kavanaugh. |
00:01:08.24 | Rupert Hanson | Thank you. |
00:01:08.29 | Unknown | Yes, please just come to the podium. Sorry, thank you for coming in. And if you'd kindly just spend a minute introducing yourself, then we'll ask you questions with the rest of our time. |
00:01:08.32 | Rupert Hanson | Yes. |
00:01:17.62 | Unknown | Why do you want to be on the Parks and Rec Commission? Who are you? Where do you live? |
00:01:20.81 | Unknown | Why do you want to volunteer? |
00:01:26.47 | Kevin McGowan | So. |
00:01:27.70 | Doreen Gunnar | Hold on. Your mic. |
00:01:29.64 | Unknown | We just need to fix the mic. So. |
00:01:35.41 | Unknown | Ooh, it's hot. |
00:01:38.29 | Unknown | who? |
00:01:38.38 | Casey Peterson | you |
00:01:39.14 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:01:39.31 | Cox | Is it on? Oh, please turn it off. Maybe just a minute in our... |
00:01:45.45 | James Kavanaugh | All right, I've been in working in the city since 79 and then, um, |
00:01:45.80 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:01:45.82 | Peter Van Meter | I don't know. |
00:01:51.42 | James Kavanaugh | In 1986, we started a |
00:01:54.76 | James Kavanaugh | Well, earlier than that, we started a video production company and set the MLK property. |
00:02:00.50 | James Kavanaugh | I'm here 12 hours every day working. |
00:02:04.70 | James Kavanaugh | I live on Filbert, but... |
00:02:07.52 | James Kavanaugh | It just seems like time to step up to get more involved. I'm already doing a bunch of things, if I can... |
00:02:14.56 | James Kavanaugh | These are cards from my dance. I put a dance on every Sunday morning in the old gym. |
00:02:19.16 | James Kavanaugh | It's free to South City residents. |
00:02:21.70 | James Kavanaugh | Please come. |
00:02:23.23 | James Kavanaugh | Um, |
00:02:25.10 | James Kavanaugh | I've made |
00:02:26.54 | James Kavanaugh | a bunch of my business is video production. |
00:02:29.85 | James Kavanaugh | A lot of corporate work, but sometimes things are |
00:02:33.85 | James Kavanaugh | other things, movies and such, which are in the library. This is one on with doctors who use poetry in their practice. It's very popular. It's even using graduate courses. This is a movie about Sausalito, the soul of Sausalito. Bruce and I finished this in 2015. |
00:02:51.92 | James Kavanaugh | And I was so full of further ideas and I'm working on a second one right now. So that's a lot. And then probably the biggest, the blue sky, there's a group of us have gathered to talk about |
00:03:06.55 | James Kavanaugh | building our own community center. |
00:03:09.38 | James Kavanaugh | I think. |
00:03:10.38 | James Kavanaugh | Saucelito deserves one. So it's a big deal. But it's worth talking about. And I condensed it into one page. Anybody like to read my edition of this? I've also recruited... |
00:03:23.73 | James Kavanaugh | the assistance of people from local centers who've already done it, of course, Mill Valley, but |
00:03:28.27 | James Kavanaugh | Brilliant game. Just finished a center. |
00:03:30.31 | James Kavanaugh | a year ago. |
00:03:32.06 | James Kavanaugh | And the woman who helped start that had has promised a tourist and answer all the questions that might come up. |
00:03:38.60 | James Kavanaugh | All this feels like to me is like it's time to... |
00:03:42.48 | James Kavanaugh | give back to where I spend my whole life. |
00:03:45.36 | James Kavanaugh | And that's why I'm here. That's why I'm here. |
00:03:50.04 | Unknown | Thank you, Mr. Kavanaugh. Are there questions please from my colleagues? |
00:03:50.14 | James Kavanaugh | I'm not sure. |
00:03:55.45 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
00:03:56.33 | Kellerman | Thank you also. Hi there. Thank you for the frequent emails we receive from you and your updates. Appreciate it. |
00:03:56.37 | Unknown | Thank you also. |
00:03:56.97 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:04:02.29 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
00:04:02.32 | Unknown | Yeah. |
00:04:02.86 | Kellerman | Can you tell us a little bit more about your idea for a community center and maybe some things you think are currently serving that purpose that you think are doing well today in the city? |
00:04:15.81 | James Kavanaugh | I don't think Slasio actually has a center, a real place to meet. There's certainly nothing like Mill Valley does, of course. Um, |
00:04:26.35 | James Kavanaugh | And I think it's doable. It seems clear to me that it would have to be at the MLK campus. It's the really only big, flat, available space. And I know there's the housing element issue. It seems to me the housing element actually could be an opportunity to take the obligation of the housing element and then do something for ourselves, let's build our own center. |
00:04:47.80 | James Kavanaugh | I have details in here about square footage and solar panels, because it seems to me relevant half story underground parking and, |
00:04:58.35 | James Kavanaugh | it would be a lot of money and a bunch of time i i think though it is a good idea and we at least deserve it |
00:05:05.72 | James Kavanaugh | to talk about it. |
00:05:07.21 | James Kavanaugh | Um, |
00:05:08.52 | James Kavanaugh | I was talking to Rainer Needleman about it, and she said she thinks it's a great idea because raising her kids here, she was always having to drive into another town because it was not the facilities. |
00:05:21.50 | James Kavanaugh | The community center would be in part for sports, but only in part. I see a great hall where we could actually have a New Year's dance and have large gatherings. I mean, the whole town couldn't fit any one room, but... |
00:05:33.36 | James Kavanaugh | A lot of people could fit in a hall like they have in Mill Valley. |
00:05:40.30 | Unknown | That would be great. |
00:05:42.26 | Unknown | Thank you. Are there other questions? |
00:05:43.91 | Cox | Have you had any involvement with the park and rec, uh, commission in the past? |
00:05:49.26 | James Kavanaugh | Well, in putting on this dance, it's their gem. So we started that in 21, during COVID, when the place was empty. And so we had, at first we were dancing with masks on, and we got to that point where it was loud to dance without. And that's as close as I've gotten to it. |
00:06:10.15 | James Kavanaugh | I couldn't tell you the mandate. I presume it means |
00:06:13.34 | James Kavanaugh | better parks and better recreation. |
00:06:16.31 | James Kavanaugh | Right? Yeah. |
00:06:17.56 | James Kavanaugh | What else could it be? |
00:06:19.38 | James Kavanaugh | So I, uh, |
00:06:21.51 | James Kavanaugh | I don't know. I feel like this is my wheelhouse, this kind of thing. I've been doing stuff like this my whole life. |
00:06:28.80 | James Kavanaugh | Thank you. |
00:06:28.92 | James Kavanaugh | Thank you. |
00:06:29.24 | James Kavanaugh | I volunteer more than I should. |
00:06:32.49 | James Kavanaugh | But... |
00:06:33.74 | James Kavanaugh | Everybody can understand that. |
00:06:36.09 | Unknown | Well, thank you, Mr. Kavanaugh. That's all the time we have. You and everyone else deserves more, but we have to get through our list. And just to set expectations, the actual appointments we made at our meeting later in the evening, this is just going to be interviews. So just so you know, the next person is Ms. Stacey Cray. |
00:06:57.75 | Unknown | So similarly, Ms. Gray, if you would just kindly take a minute to introduce |
00:07:00.59 | Stacey Cray | It works. |
00:07:01.54 | Stacey Cray | So I bought a house in Sausalito in 2014. I also had a place in San Francisco at that time. And I was we were renovating the house. We lived in this very small house, my ex-husband and my two kids and fell in love with the city. I didn't I sort of went back to San Francisco kicking and screaming and kept the house and have lived there intermittently for the last ten years. And then recently I bought a house on Cloud View Road. |
00:07:29.33 | Stacey Cray | And part of the reason I bought another house was because the house that I have has a hundred stairs from the driveway down to the, um, |
00:07:40.01 | Stacey Cray | entrance of the home. |
00:07:41.44 | Stacey Cray | And I have a son who has a neuro neurological issues and it has an accessibility issues. So I was looking for a house in Sausalito that was on one level and had a view. |
00:07:54.45 | Stacey Cray | And I found it. But the reason that I applied was that I saw on Currents that you were looking for artists. And I am a singer-songwriter. I'm very involved in theater in San Francisco and also in New York. I've been writing a musical for the last eight years. |
00:08:11.70 | Stacey Cray | And I'm really deeply involved in the New York theater scene, musical theater scene. So I'd love to see some musical theater and some theater in general in Sausalito. And I think there are opportunities. |
00:08:21.19 | Stacey Cray | when folks come out here to maybe get them to come somewhere in Sausalito to do a a community concert and that sort of thing. I'm also very interested in, um, in, in improving the, the, the, uh, public spaces in, in Sausalito. They're wonderful. |
00:08:35.65 | Stacey Cray | they could be more accessible. |
00:08:37.54 | Stacey Cray | and some of them are a little bit run down. |
00:08:40.19 | Stacey Cray | Just taking as an example, the little playground that's up where I live on cloud view, like, I don't know what that is, except sort of a scary place that nobody goes. And it seems like, you know, it could be a nicer place. And maybe just connecting the areas, like I sort of dream of a sauce leader that's a little bit connected, more connected with all these roads that were never built and the kind of |
00:08:57.82 | Stacey Cray | semi-dilapidated staircases and how do we make sure that |
00:09:01.41 | Stacey Cray | seniors and people with disabilities can access at least some of those spaces. So those are, I mean, I think I love the jazz and blues by the bay. Like there's just so many things you're doing right here at the arts festival, the new art |
00:09:14.11 | Stacey Cray | building, whatever that is. |
00:09:16.75 | Stacey Cray | Um, it's just, and it's such a great town and all of these applicants are so incredibly well-qualified. It's just, I just feel it's an honor to be here and chat with you about this. |
00:09:22.51 | Katie Thau Garcia | I just, |
00:09:26.74 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:09:28.65 | Unknown | I'll kick it off with the first question. Do you have a specific idea on how to bring more live performance, especially dance to Sausalito? |
00:09:38.29 | Unknown | dance or you see your I said music |
00:09:39.92 | Stacey Cray | I said music. Well, I mean, there are certainly |
00:09:45.24 | Stacey Cray | avenues to doing that. I mean, one, I'm also a member of the Battery at San Francisco. They bring in a lot of artists and I'd be happy to coordinate. I'm sure there are other Sausalito members to just sort of create a team. They do things over here anyway. And so often they'll have a person from the, who's a pretty big deal musical artist come over. There also could be outdoor performances. My mom has actually been very involved in the, she was the president of the |
00:10:12.54 | Stacey Cray | uh, a theater in Half Moon Bay called Coastal Rep. She's still around and helping me. And so she has a lot of experience with outdoor activities. And I think like in Dumfey Park and some of the other places there could be, you know, you could have Shakespeare in the park, um, during the summer, which would be lovely. |
00:10:30.87 | Unknown | it. |
00:10:31.00 | Stacey Cray | Thank you. |
00:10:31.14 | Unknown | Vice Mayor. |
00:10:32.39 | Cox | Thank you. Have you met any of the folks who run the Sausalito Center for the Arts at the Bank of America building? |
00:10:38.82 | Stacey Cray | I ran into that, you know, like having as, as Sausalito goes, right. I went to have dinner at Poggio and went across the street and was like, what's going on here. And of course there was an event. And so I chatted with some of the people that were there, but I haven't had a chance to, |
00:10:50.48 | Stacey Cray | really connect, um, more deeply. And I hope to do that soon sometime soon. |
00:10:53.85 | Cox | Lovely. Thank you. |
00:10:58.21 | Unknown | Thank you, Ms. Gray. Thanks. Thank you very much. |
00:11:01.43 | Unknown | Ms. Sonia Salzman, please welcome. |
00:11:04.99 | Unknown | So similarly, welcome. If you kindly summarize for a minute yourself, introduce yourself, then we'll ask you some questions. |
00:11:11.39 | Sonia Saltzman | For sure. Thank you so much first for giving me this opportunity to do an interview. I'm super excited to be here with all of you and these other wonderful applicants. My name is Sonia Saltzman. I was born and raised in Mo Valley and recently moved to Sausalito. And so when I saw this opportunity, I really jumped at it to get more involved in the Parks and Recs Department. A little bit about my background. I currently serve as a senior program coordinator at the Youth Leadership Institute. And in this position, I coordinate the Marin County Youth Commission and Marin Organizing for Racial Equity. And so my background is very focused on youth development and creating inclusive spaces and communities for Marin County residents. And so I'm very excited about this opportunity. And one of the reasons why I am applying to be a commissioner is to make the parks and recs more inclusive and have more representation. |
00:12:02.75 | Sonia Saltzman | Um, I'm also very passionate about a little bit about what Stacy talked about making Sausalito more ADA inclusive, um, especially with kind of the physical, um, |
00:12:12.88 | Sonia Saltzman | Um, groundwork. |
00:12:14.45 | Sonia Saltzman | um, |
00:12:15.33 | Sonia Saltzman | And so, yeah, I think I'm just very passionate about public service and really getting more involved in the Sausalito community. And so that's primarily why I'm applying. And I appreciate this opportunity. |
00:12:28.72 | Unknown | Thank you. Questions, please. |
00:12:32.64 | Kellerman | I'd be interested in maybe some examples of some events that you've helped coordinate or executed in your current |
00:12:40.03 | Sonia Saltzman | Roll. |
00:12:40.77 | Sonia Saltzman | Yeah, of course. In my current role, I work a lot with the county of Marin to host community events. And so some of the events we've hosted is our annual May Wellness Festival, which is hosted at Terralinda every year to promote wellness and mental health resources specifically for young people, but also just the overall community. Another event we recently hosted in April was the Cultural Fusion Fair, which brought together music, dance, food, and just opportunities for people to engage in cross-cultural dialogue. And then another event... |
00:13:15.05 | Sonia Saltzman | that we've done is community forums, as well as working with the board of supervisors to host events regarding civic engagement. And so kind of a diverse array of events that I think are really connected to the Parks and Recs Commission and some events that we could potentially see in Sausalito as well. |
00:13:35.47 | Cox | Yes, I see from your resume how involved you are in Marin County. Yeah. And I see that you're part of Marin Women's PAC. |
00:13:39.85 | Unknown | Yeah. |
00:13:45.25 | Cox | which of course weighs in on our elections. |
00:13:48.02 | Cox | Every year. Yeah. |
00:13:48.86 | Sonia Saltzman | Definitely. |
00:13:50.10 | Sonia Saltzman | I love them. I've been actually working with Laurel to host an event in October of next year to get young people more civically engaged. And so we're hoping to host a forum with local community members and giving that opportunity for those conversations, as well as getting young people to pre-register to vote. |
00:14:08.79 | Cox | Yeah. |
00:14:09.11 | Sonia Saltzman | I've attended |
00:14:09.49 | Cox | at a couple of the events with high school kids who are getting involved in the political process. I just think it's fantastic, the work that they're doing. |
00:14:16.15 | Sonia Saltzman | and then. |
00:14:16.25 | Cox | Thank you. |
00:14:16.27 | Sonia Saltzman | And. |
00:14:16.77 | Sonia Saltzman | Definitely, definitely agree. Thank you. |
00:14:18.06 | Cox | you for that. |
00:14:18.82 | Sonia Saltzman | Yeah. |
00:14:21.67 | Unknown | Other questions? |
00:14:24.28 | Unknown | In your youth outreach, do you work actively with the school district or is this completely separate from the school district? |
00:14:30.39 | Sonia Saltzman | It's both. So primarily we work with the county of Marin, but we also do work with the different school districts to get young people involved. So there's a lot of working partnerships. But yeah, the school districts are included. |
00:14:43.54 | Unknown | Do you have any... |
00:14:44.90 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:14:45.36 | Unknown | formal association with our school district here. |
00:14:47.91 | Sonia Saltzman | I do not. |
00:14:49.61 | Sonia Saltzman | Thank you. |
00:14:50.88 | Sonia Saltzman | Yeah. |
00:14:52.41 | Unknown | I think that's all the questions we have. Thank you very much. |
00:14:54.03 | Sonia Saltzman | Thank you very much. Thank you. I appreciate it. |
00:14:57.39 | Unknown | Miss Danielle. |
00:14:58.62 | Unknown | Kenan is next. |
00:15:00.97 | Unknown | Hello, welcome. |
00:15:06.59 | Danielle Kenan | Thank you for having me. Yeah, welcome. My name is Danielle, and my favorite day of the year is the Sausalito Super Bowl. |
00:15:07.86 | Unknown | Welcome. |
00:15:13.09 | Sharna Brockett | Thank you. |
00:15:13.12 | Kathy Nikitas | Uh, |
00:15:14.72 | Danielle Kenan | Every year I have a countdown, I have a special outfit. I truly think Sausalito is one of the, if not the most magical community in the world. And I've been a member of the Sausalito community since 2016. |
00:15:31.65 | Danielle Kenan | by way of Craigslist. I was moving from Ohio, then Mill Valley, looking for a place to live, and I typed in water into the entire housing section of the Bay Area. |
00:15:43.78 | Danielle Kenan | and landed on a houseboat for four years and kind of was exposed to that magical community. |
00:15:49.76 | Danielle Kenan | I then bought a motor yacht after that, lived in Marina Plaza, different community, also wonderful. |
00:15:57.11 | Danielle Kenan | Then on land, and now I'm up on Harrison, but it is an absolutely delightful community. My most passionate involvement recently has been with the Sausalito Cruising Club. |
00:16:09.26 | Danielle Kenan | I did spend three years on the board there, was vice commodore last year. |
00:16:14.65 | Danielle Kenan | and really enjoyed helping plan events there, music, bringing community together. |
00:16:21.48 | Danielle Kenan | And most recently with Scott Jampel, who does Sal Salido Liquor Company, we purchased Keep Sal Salty with the attempt of reviving it, joining the Historical Society, really joining and learning everything about Sal Salido and to share it with the world. |
00:16:37.97 | Danielle Kenan | Um, and also our, our wonderful community that's here. And the adult Easter egg hunt is my second favorite day of the year. |
00:16:47.65 | Danielle Kenan | Nice to see you all. |
00:16:49.56 | Unknown | Fantastic. |
00:16:51.38 | Danielle Kenan | Oh, sorry. One more thing. I'm a graphic designer. |
00:16:54.71 | Danielle Kenan | I'm a graphic designer. Um, I, I lead a team of 25 people internationally. |
00:17:00.04 | Danielle Kenan | I really believe in positivity and collaboration and assuming good intent. And I think those are key qualities for a role like this. |
00:17:07.60 | Danielle Kenan | Um, |
00:17:08.48 | Danielle Kenan | Mainly snacks and enthusiasm is what I bring. So if you need that, that's what I'm here for. |
00:17:13.36 | Unknown | thank you for that. And thanks for your help at the cruising club. I'm a member there as well. It sounds like you're have a lot of energy and I'd like to do a lot of things. So if you're on the commission, what are you imagining that you're going to want to do? |
00:17:25.51 | Danielle Kenan | anything and everything that might be needed. I really have a passion for bringing things together and bringing people together and, and, |
00:17:35.51 | Danielle Kenan | kind of the area I fit is what I call glimmers of bringing that extra special magic and delight of just that, that extra fun. |
00:17:46.03 | Danielle Kenan | I do act very much as a cheerleader in an organization of |
00:17:50.53 | Danielle Kenan | of really, you know, embracing team members, supporting each other and, um, making magic, hopefully. |
00:17:59.69 | Unknown | Mayor? Yes. |
00:18:01.26 | Kellerman | So can you tell us a little bit more about what you want to do with keep Sausalito salty and what that means to you? |
00:18:07.54 | Danielle Kenan | Oh, gosh, yeah, absolutely. Keep Salced to Salty is a very much a passion project. It is really looking at what makes our town what it is, and making sure that history is preserved and shared and celebrated. I mean, I think we have roughly 2 million visitors coming through. How do we tell that story and get those, you know, wonderful things about our town across in a way that's, that's meaningful, um, in a way that, you know, continues to embrace our history and look forward as well. |
00:18:46.34 | Unknown | Any other questions? |
00:18:47.52 | Unknown | Can I double up? Did you say you make good snacks? |
00:18:48.68 | Unknown | So you make it. |
00:18:50.79 | Danielle Kenan | Yes. |
00:18:51.13 | Unknown | Can you expand on that? Oh, yeah. |
00:18:52.71 | Danielle Kenan | Oh, yeah. I make a great charcuterie board. I also do cheese boards, wine. |
00:19:00.82 | Kellerman | I mean, she mentioned it as part of the application. |
00:19:02.67 | Danielle Kenan | It's true. It's true. Thank you for asking. |
00:19:03.99 | Kellerman | Thank you for asking. Thank you for offering. Yeah. |
00:19:08.39 | Unknown | Well, thank you very much. |
00:19:09.62 | Danielle Kenan | Thank you for your time. |
00:19:11.97 | Unknown | So Avalon Johnson, please. |
00:19:19.24 | Unknown | I'm sorry, for anyone who's expecting Karina, she withdrew or was not able to attend, actually, just from a... |
00:19:23.65 | Unknown | I'm sorry? |
00:19:23.93 | Unknown | schedule. The next candidate, the vice mayor asked, Karina Hughes is not here. |
00:19:23.95 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:19:28.73 | Unknown | Oh, you are here. |
00:19:29.57 | Unknown | Well. |
00:19:31.71 | Unknown | Okay. |
00:19:32.98 | Unknown | I'm glad you spoke up. Then my order is different than the one that's in the binder. There is one candidate. |
00:19:38.75 | Avalon Johnson | Should I step in? |
00:19:39.17 | Unknown | who is not able to come, but I think that might be Stella Benton at the end, actually. |
00:19:43.96 | Avalon Johnson | I'm Avalon. |
00:19:44.56 | Unknown | Go right ahead. Sorry for the mix up. |
00:19:46.39 | Avalon Johnson | Hi. |
00:19:46.48 | Unknown | Hi. Welcome Ms. Johnson. If you'd kindly introduce yourself for a minute. Yeah. And we'll ask you our questions. |
00:19:49.79 | Avalon Johnson | Yeah. |
00:19:51.76 | Avalon Johnson | My name is Avalon Johnson. I moved here in 2021. Like a lot of people, probably my first visit to Sausalito was on the ferry. And it just was wonderful. I paddle outrigger canoes. And we are living in Palo Alto. and I paddle in San Francisco. And I don't know if you realize, but when you're in San Francisco in the fog and you look across the bay, you see the sunshine. And I'm like, I'm living over there. I'm living in Sausalito. |
00:20:27.82 | Avalon Johnson | Well, I live in Hurricane Gulch. That tells you something, right? |
00:20:32.55 | Avalon Johnson | Oh my God. So, |
00:20:34.89 | Avalon Johnson | Yeah, it's a little colder than I imagined. I do a lot of sports. I do outrigger canoeing. |
00:20:40.34 | Avalon Johnson | Yeah. |
00:20:41.78 | Avalon Johnson | I run the trails of Mount Tam. |
00:20:46.42 | Avalon Johnson | have taken up to running the stairs of Sausalito. I think being able to step out your front door and to be able to go to the Highlands or to spend five minutes and go to Mount Tom is just an amazing thing. I have canoes at Blue Water. |
00:21:05.52 | Avalon Johnson | I love anything that has to do with the water and as someone almost turning 65 I feel that |
00:21:19.71 | Avalon Johnson | There are a few things I would love in Sausalito, such as, you know, I'll run into the city and there's outdoor facilities that you can do little exercises on. And I see everybody doing it. Or I lived in, when I lived in LA, |
00:21:37.72 | Avalon Johnson | I worked at USC, which in case you don't know is in the hood. And I would drive home in the evening and I would pass these outdoor parks and they were full of people. And they would just have like an elliptical machine that's not really an elliptical machine and everybody would be |
00:21:55.98 | Avalon Johnson | It was amazing because everybody would use it. And I feel that here we have |
00:22:02.46 | Avalon Johnson | a lot of |
00:22:03.77 | Avalon Johnson | adults who would probably use |
00:22:07.79 | Avalon Johnson | outdoor gyms, it's not complicated, right? It's just a little thing, a little step, a little thing. |
00:22:13.60 | Avalon Johnson | anything. And I feel that |
00:22:16.31 | Avalon Johnson | That would make a huge difference. And as you can tell, I love anything to do with sports. I work full time though. So that's it. |
00:22:21.36 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:22:24.46 | Unknown | It's it. |
00:22:25.41 | Unknown | That's wonderful. Thank you. Any questions for Ms. Johnson? |
00:22:29.63 | Unknown | One of the centers of I know an enthusiasm of Councilmember Kelman is trying to have more aquatic |
00:22:36.97 | Unknown | Physical activities like rowing in town. I see your outriggers every... |
00:22:41.30 | Unknown | afternoon. |
00:22:42.10 | Avalon Johnson | Yeah, that's our competitor, by the way. |
00:22:42.57 | Unknown | That's not what the weather is. |
00:22:44.66 | Unknown | Okay. |
00:22:45.42 | Unknown | Do you have any notions about... |
00:22:48.46 | Unknown | actually |
00:22:49.83 | Unknown | capitalizing on Sausalito's brand and genuine foundation of merit of aquatic rowing and other physical activities on the water. |
00:22:59.83 | Avalon Johnson | Well, the thing is we have C-TREC, right? And C-TREC offers... |
00:23:05.59 | Avalon Johnson | It's a gem. |
00:23:07.21 | Avalon Johnson | So I, you know, when you ask this question, I can't think of anything that we could add that C-TREC doesn't have because C-TREC is amazing. |
00:23:18.58 | Avalon Johnson | if there is outreach with C-TREC that would bring in a little bit more of the community, you know, because I know C-TREC exists, but, and I assume everybody does, but maybe not everybody does. So bringing, you know, something to interact with C-TREC would be amazing. But honestly, I really am like set on these little steps that you could walk on or little machines that you could use just distributed throughout some park somewhere that would just bring people together. |
00:23:53.49 | Unknown | So following up on that particular idea, have you interacted at all with Sausalito Village or with Age-Brendly Sausalito? |
00:23:58.96 | Avalon Johnson | friendly. |
00:24:00.01 | Avalon Johnson | Yeah, my neighbor is a member. As I said, I work full time, so I have not. She's a member. She says it's a way for people to come up and bring the senior citizens together, but I have not interacted with it. |
00:24:16.44 | Unknown | These are great ideas, and I hope you'll mention it to your neighbor, because I think that would be a wonderful addition to the care that's provided for Salisbury residents as they age. |
00:24:21.73 | Unknown | All right. |
00:24:26.10 | Unknown | All right. |
00:24:27.13 | Unknown | Other questions for Ms. Johnson? |
00:24:31.36 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:24:31.48 | Unknown | Thank you for your time and thank you for being here. |
00:24:34.08 | Unknown | Uh, Ms. Hughes, now, now we got the right order. Welcome. Thank you for being here. If you'd also kindly just... |
00:24:41.98 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:24:42.38 | Unknown | Tell us about yourself for a minute. |
00:24:43.49 | Karina Hughes | Thank you. Hello, everyone. It's a pleasure being here. And I think where I would begin, so I'm Karina Hughes. I was born and raised in the Bay Area and I've been coming to Sausalito my life, my entire life. |
00:24:56.61 | Karina Hughes | I am invested in Sausalito emotionally |
00:25:00.69 | Karina Hughes | with property in my community. I love the community. And I think it's the people here that make it. |
00:25:10.73 | Karina Hughes | so special. |
00:25:12.72 | Karina Hughes | I volunteer with Sausalito Beautiful. I'm a volunteer on Thursday nights. |
00:25:18.39 | Karina Hughes | um, |
00:25:19.09 | Karina Hughes | meditation practice. And so I'm doing that. |
00:25:21.95 | Karina Hughes | locally here. |
00:25:23.61 | Karina Hughes | Um, |
00:25:24.94 | Karina Hughes | And I've been involved in a number of different activities like Botching League. And yes, I'm a member of different groups through which I have met many people and I'm engaged, right, with the community. One of the things that is important to me is the parks, the health of the parks, and their importance to both visitors and to local residents. So that's why I'm involved with Saucyuta Beautiful and getting out and digging up the weeds and doing what I can do on different days with my local residents. In a point in my life where I'm able to have a little bit more time to spend. So I show up here. I've been Zooming off and on for years into city council. So I like to be kept, I like to be involved as best I possibly can when I can. My father was a World War II vet. He served in the Pacific. The marineship is really important to me, the legacy of the marineship. The nexus of this beautiful topography, the place where we live, the gem that is Sausalito is extremely important to me and the health of this society and this community. |
00:26:43.44 | Karina Hughes | this was an opportunity for me to step forward and maybe do a little bit more. My next, my, um, |
00:26:50.56 | Karina Hughes | My wheelhouse is branding, business, advertising, marketing. So I come into this from a little bit different perspective in that I'm looking at what is that nexus between the visitors and our residents and what will continue to make this city not just |
00:27:12.10 | Karina Hughes | prosperous and profitable right but is engaging for uh residents so that's why i'm involved in different things as well um uh i think that's that's it but i love this city and i love the community and um so just want to help as much as i can |
00:27:32.45 | Unknown | Thank you. As much as I can. |
00:27:33.61 | Unknown | Thank you. Questions for Ms. Hughes? |
00:27:36.79 | Kellerman | Sure. Are there any particular types of events or projects that you could see yourself spearheading? We heard some great examples from other applicants tonight. Anything you want to talk about? |
00:27:44.65 | Karina Hughes | and snow. |
00:27:46.35 | Karina Hughes | Yeah. So in the business world, I was involved in doing things like everything from building and running an on-site event for 300 people with 14 speakers. I've been involved in working with different innovation teams and accelerators. I don't have an idea around what I might spearhead for Sausalito, for the Parks and Recs, but... |
00:28:14.89 | Karina Hughes | But I've been involved in many different activities in which it required the management of multiple people coming together to produce things from T-shirts to banners to, you know, sound production and everything else. And that comes from also being in advertising and radio, television, print background. That was one example anyway. Yeah. |
00:28:45.20 | Unknown | Other questions? |
00:28:47.83 | Karina Hughes | Thank you. |
00:28:47.85 | Unknown | Okay. |
00:28:48.08 | Unknown | Thank you for being here very much. Thanks for volunteering. |
00:28:51.88 | Unknown | So, Ms. Michelle McCullough. Welcome. |
00:29:00.52 | Michelle McCullough | Hello, thank you for having me. I'm Michelle McCullough. |
00:29:01.08 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:29:01.38 | Unknown | THE FAMILY. |
00:29:03.96 | Michelle McCullough | And well, let's say, so I'm born and raised here in the Bay Area. I grew up in Walnut Creek. |
00:29:08.69 | Michelle McCullough | went to school in San Francisco and Oakland, lived in San Francisco for almost 20 years. |
00:29:14.17 | Michelle McCullough | I had a business. |
00:29:15.86 | Michelle McCullough | on Union Street in San Francisco for over a decade and then decided |
00:29:20.16 | Michelle McCullough | in 2016 to move to Sausalito. |
00:29:23.94 | Michelle McCullough | which I never thought I'd be living here. And I'll tell you why. When I was a kid, my parents brought us to Sausalito because their best friends lived here. |
00:29:31.75 | Michelle McCullough | And you have to imagine as a kid, I never thought that I would be able to afford to live in Sausalito. But thankfully, I was able to build my business in San Francisco. I just sold it last year. So I've had the privilege to really take the time to walk around the city for the last year. |
00:29:50.00 | Michelle McCullough | and really take it in. |
00:29:52.36 | Michelle McCullough | and see what is it that I want to do next. |
00:29:56.05 | Michelle McCullough | I definitely identify as an entrepreneur. I'm the daughter of immigrants. My father and mother met in San Francisco in an ESL class. That's how I got my name, Michelle Maybel. |
00:30:05.32 | Michelle McCullough | I speak Spanish. My father immigrated from Iran and my mother immigrated from El Salvador. |
00:30:10.43 | Michelle McCullough | And I'm married to an Italian man, so now I speak Italian. And interestingly, I met my husband here. |
00:30:17.59 | Michelle McCullough | Little by little, I started to realize that I was always meant to be here because I truly feel that there is something I meant to build in the city. |
00:30:26.06 | Michelle McCullough | but I don't know what it is yet. I'm a firm believer. And if you build it, they will come. So what, |
00:30:31.69 | Michelle McCullough | really ignited my interest and how I could serve this community. |
00:30:35.95 | Michelle McCullough | First started as an entrepreneur workshop in the library. |
00:30:39.49 | Michelle McCullough | How to Start a Business in Sausalito. |
00:30:41.63 | Michelle McCullough | As I started to meet more members that serve this community, |
00:30:45.28 | Michelle McCullough | I realized that my background in project management, |
00:30:48.42 | Michelle McCullough | event management, |
00:30:49.99 | Michelle McCullough | talent acquisition and talent development, |
00:30:52.40 | Michelle McCullough | might be useful to this community, |
00:30:54.36 | Michelle McCullough | As well as working for a landscape design company. |
00:30:57.61 | Michelle McCullough | and |
00:30:59.30 | Michelle McCullough | being pretty good at getting a lot of stuff for free when you put on events. |
00:31:02.00 | Katie Thau Garcia | When you put on. |
00:31:03.52 | Michelle McCullough | And that comes from working for a nonprofit for five years. So I've got a mixed background from working as a TV host, TV correspondent, |
00:31:11.97 | Michelle McCullough | event production, film production. James might be familiar with my talent agency because he |
00:31:19.81 | Michelle McCullough | similar to James. |
00:31:21.15 | Michelle McCullough | I'm also very interested in bringing film. |
00:31:24.51 | Michelle McCullough | to this city. I think it would be great to have films in the park. |
00:31:29.34 | Michelle McCullough | outdoor screenings are really |
00:31:31.57 | Michelle McCullough | a great way to bring the community together. |
00:31:34.06 | Michelle McCullough | And because so many. |
00:31:36.06 | Michelle McCullough | films, classic films were filmed here in San Francisco and Sausalito. |
00:31:41.17 | Michelle McCullough | I want the younger community to understand |
00:31:45.78 | Michelle McCullough | What's so exciting about Sausalito? Why my parents partied here? What was so exciting about it? Well, let's look at the plant's revival and rock and roll and music coming back. Let's look at my favorite, the Sausalito Center of Arts. |
00:32:00.00 | Michelle McCullough | I buy art there and I get to meet the artists and I get to |
00:32:04.88 | Michelle McCullough | Meet other people in my community that have similar interests. I'm a big fan of the yard sale because I love picking and garage sales and finding goodies. |
00:32:13.70 | Michelle McCullough | And I'm the type of person that is not afraid to roll up her sleeves and get dirty. So if it's pulling weeds or picking up poop at the dog park, I'm all about it. I have a dog. You've probably seen me around town. It's a big old Rottweiler. |
00:32:26.75 | Michelle McCullough | And I've seen some questionable things at the dog park and other things. |
00:32:31.64 | Michelle McCullough | behaviors that I think are kind of strange. |
00:32:33.85 | Michelle McCullough | And I feel like that's because we're not really... |
00:32:37.88 | Michelle McCullough | respecting each other in this community. I see |
00:32:41.53 | Michelle McCullough | different communities kind of colliding. |
00:32:43.98 | Michelle McCullough | And I think parks and rec bring us all together in that way. So I'd really just like to apply that. |
00:32:47.69 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
00:32:47.93 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
00:32:50.10 | Michelle McCullough | my love for this city, my entrepreneurial spirit, and my project management to Parks and Rec. |
00:32:59.82 | Unknown | Thank you very much. Let's remember, tell me. |
00:33:02.69 | Kellerman | Welcome. Thank you. Thank you for all of that. And sorry, we have a long list and it's arranged by everybody's application. So I'm scrolling and trying to keep track. You guys are all so accomplished. |
00:33:14.81 | Kellerman | It looks like I'm trying to read my screen. But I did see your work with International Latino Film Festival. |
00:33:21.02 | Kellerman | And I do have a little bit of envy when Mill Valley has their film festival. And I would love to hear your thoughts and how we might bring the International Latino Film Festival to Sausalito. |
00:33:32.22 | Michelle McCullough | So I'll tell you, unfortunately, the International Latino Film Festival is no longer. I was the San Francisco director of events for five years until my former boss ended that festival and moved down. |
00:33:33.03 | Kellerman | the internet. |
00:33:42.82 | Michelle McCullough | to Mexico that transformed into the San Francisco Latino Film Festival, which my agency sponsors. |
00:33:50.06 | Michelle McCullough | Thank you. |
00:33:50.16 | Michelle McCullough | So that would be very easy. We would just have to find places that we can screen. But I'll tell you what, Lucho Ramirez, who is a good friend of mine in the... |
00:33:53.16 | Stacey Cray | places. |
00:33:57.97 | Michelle McCullough | president of that nonprofit. |
00:33:59.98 | Michelle McCullough | would love to |
00:34:01.08 | Michelle McCullough | to connect with the city and it would be very easy to bring Spanish films to Sausalito and it would bring me no greater joy to do that and outdoor screenings would be a great way to introduce this community to Latino films. |
00:34:15.29 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:34:15.96 | Cox | Thank you. |
00:34:17.11 | Michelle McCullough | Thank you. |
00:34:17.16 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:34:17.20 | Michelle McCullough | Thank you. |
00:34:17.24 | Unknown | you. |
00:34:17.47 | Michelle McCullough | Thank you. |
00:34:18.43 | Unknown | Any other questions? Thank you very much. |
00:34:20.81 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:34:20.96 | Cox | Thank you so much. I don't have a question, but I do want to thank you for your participation in the teaching series here. |
00:34:27.62 | Michelle McCullough | Oh, I'm all about it. Tessa's doing a great job, Nikita, who I met, and it's encouraging me to really meet more of the business owners in town and support local business. |
00:34:36.40 | Michelle McCullough | Yeah. Thank you so much for that. Thank you. |
00:34:40.63 | Unknown | And our last person is Frank Millian. |
00:34:44.65 | Frank Millian | Welcome, sir. |
00:34:47.25 | Frank Millian | Hi, and thanks for having me. You're welcome. My name is Frank Mylan. I live up on Cloudview. I relocated here to Sausalito. |
00:34:53.76 | Frank Millian | when I retired in 2012. I spent my entire career in the private aviation sector. I was a pilot starting out as a pilot |
00:35:02.32 | Frank Millian | And then moving into senior management, I ran several various companies that provided business aviation services to those owners of the aircraft. |
00:35:11.38 | Frank Millian | And since retiring, I wanted to stay in the business and give back to some of the companies. And one of the things I'm currently doing is conducting aviation safety audits, where I go into an operation. |
00:35:25.12 | Frank Millian | And we review their operating standards to see if they are up to par with industry best practices. And if they have a very active and productive safety management system, that all takes a couple of days to get it through. They get through the audit successfully, then they will be issued a certain safety rating that they can actually put on their website saying that they meet the standard, et cetera, et cetera. My interest in being part of the Parks and Recreation Commission is that I'm very, very active in sports. I currently and have been for over 30 years playing a men's hardball league. I play in national tournaments. I've won eight World Series rings. I play a lot of pickleball down at MLK. |
00:36:07.47 | Frank Millian | And I understand that there's an interest to expand the pickleball courts over to Marin |
00:36:12.45 | Frank Millian | Marine ship. |
00:36:14.05 | Frank Millian | And I just would like to offer a player's perspective to any growth that the, you know, that you might have in pickleball. And that's, that's my story. |
00:36:27.66 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:36:27.69 | Frank Millian | question. |
00:36:27.89 | Unknown | and the other questions. |
00:36:28.04 | Frank Millian | please |
00:36:28.62 | Unknown | you |
00:36:29.29 | Kellerman | Yes, I also play pickleball and I will also be looking for you. |
00:36:33.12 | Frank Millian | Wednesday, Friday, every morning. |
00:36:33.21 | Kellerman | I'm not sure. |
00:36:35.23 | Kellerman | Oh, what time? So I know he's going to be on my team. Are you kidding me? So a question for you. You guys all probably know that the Parks and Rec Department is one of the only departments that has the opportunity to be revenue generating with its events. You mentioned pickleball, one of the fastest growing sports. Do you have any thoughts about how we might build out a pickleball reputation, so to speak, in Southern Marin and |
00:37:00.41 | Kellerman | whether that would be a direction you would want the city to go in? |
00:37:04.29 | Frank Millian | Well, I mean, you could, like in Marin City, they have the pickleball courts over there, and those cost money. You have to pay in order to reserve it for an hour or whatever it is. So there's possibly a revenue generation that could come from opening up the new courts. I understand that there's... |
00:37:22.04 | Frank Millian | There's lights over there, which means that |
00:37:24.69 | Frank Millian | You're you'll be playing the evening hours, of course, there's a cost associated with that. So to participate in that, you know, a fee could be charged for use of the courts from whatever hours that the lights would be on. |
00:37:38.36 | Frank Millian | That's one thing you could also have. I mean, there's so much popularity in the pickleball community is that you could you could actually have, especially if you have enough courts, you could put together tournament play. |
00:37:49.63 | Frank Millian | And I think you'd be a lot of interest in that because people are just out there, you know, playing around and having fun and all that kind of stuff. But some of them are really serious. |
00:37:57.78 | Frank Millian | And I think you could get some serious activity if you had some kind of a tournament play. And I played in so many tournaments, I could certainly aid in putting together how the tournament would start and how it would end. |
00:38:14.20 | Sandra Bushmuth | Thank you. |
00:38:16.48 | Unknown | Any other questions? |
00:38:18.54 | Unknown | I want to ask you some aviation questions, but I'll set that aside. |
00:38:22.07 | Unknown | and talk to you about it another time. I used to be an aircraft designer, so. |
00:38:25.73 | Unknown | But that's all the time we have for questions. So thank you so much. |
00:38:28.24 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:38:29.48 | Unknown | Thanks. |
00:38:30.57 | Unknown | And thanks to everyone who is here. Ms. Benton, Stella Benton, she was not able to make her point in time. So that is the end of the interviews. And really do appreciate your volunteers. And later today, we will be selecting the candidates for the commission. But no matter what, thank you. And please stay involved. It's really good to see you all here. We're now gonna move on to our closed session. So we're gonna discuss two matters, the Conference of Legal Counsel on Existing Litigation, Yes, In My Backyard versus City of Sausalito. Actually, that is the only matter we're gonna be discussing. |
00:39:07.28 | Unknown | So we'll take public comment on that matter. Is there any public comment, city clerk? |
00:39:11.28 | Mayor Sobieski | If any members of the public would like to make a comment on closed session, please fill out one of those slips over by the television. On Zoom, seeing none, and here in Council Chamber, seeing none. |
00:39:23.66 | Unknown | Okay. Thank you, City Clerk. We'll close public comment and move on to closed session. We'll resume at 7 p.m. All right. We will resume the public meeting. Welcome to everyone who's here. Just an announcement that Councilmember Blasdain is running late. She will join the meeting when she arrives. There are no announcements from closed session, and we'll begin today's meeting with a recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. |
00:39:28.86 | Mayor Sobieski | Virginia. |
00:39:46.97 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:39:57.36 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:40:00.72 | Unknown | Yeah. |
00:40:01.97 | Unknown | And we will now have a few announcements. I will start with the good news that we are proud to announce that our own Mr. Jim Gabbard is going to be this year's 4th of July Parade Grand Marshal. |
00:40:14.66 | Unknown | Jim Hook. |
00:40:18.61 | Unknown | Jim has been a resident of Sausalito since the early 1960s and spent his first 30 years living on a boat. He is best known for his 50s dance parties on Kofi TV 20, which he owned until 1998. |
00:40:30.35 | Unknown | He is a pioneer of FM radio broadcasting and was inducted into the Bay Area Hall of Fame, Radio Hall of Fame in 2006. |
00:40:38.70 | Unknown | Among his many accomplishments, he has been Grand Marshal of the Lighted Boat Parade for 38 years and is a founding member and vice president of Sausalito on the Waterfront Foundation. |
00:40:48.98 | Unknown | Jim has served as Commodore of the Sausalito Yacht Club, Chair of the Sausalito Chamber of Commerce, and President of the Sausalito Art Festival. We're excited to honor his commitment to Sausalito during our Independence Day celebrations, not least because of his help in making the fireworks happen this year. So congratulations to Jim, and we'll see him on the 4th of July. |
00:41:08.66 | Unknown | Uh, |
00:41:10.14 | Unknown | Also, as an update and bit of celebration, we've asked Reason Bradley to come here this evening to give us an update on the Sea Lion sculpture reinstallation. So, Mr. Bradley, I think I saw you here or is he in the hall? |
00:41:25.03 | Unknown | I see. Good timing. |
00:41:27.56 | Unknown | City manager. There he is. Reason, you're up. Mr. Bradley, you're up. |
00:41:31.41 | Unknown | Uh, |
00:41:31.54 | Reason Bradley | All right. |
00:41:31.79 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:41:32.20 | Unknown | So please give us an update. |
00:41:33.63 | Reason Bradley | Okay hi i'm reason Bradley I got tapped to help with the sea lion project. When it fell off of its pedestal a year and a half ago so. |
00:41:46.20 | Reason Bradley | We looked at the whole project and I learned quite a bit my whole life. I grew up in Sausalito and the sea lion was just there and I saw it wash off into the rocks. And so I offered to help |
00:42:00.41 | Reason Bradley | fix the sea lion and repair it. And in that I learned that this is the second time that this has happened. And so when we got our hands on the sea line, we got it all cleaned up and found that it was corroding and it had never been protected from electrolysis. So electrical currents have been eating away at it and it's degraded a bit over the years. So we did a full restoration on the sea lion and |
00:42:25.49 | Reason Bradley | Then we included zincs into it to help protect it for a long time. And we designed everything with the same material so we don't have dissimilar metals in the project. And the hope is that if we take care of it by changing the zincs, it will last 100 years and not fall off the rocks every 20 years. So we kind of approached it with that. |
00:42:48.52 | Reason Bradley | idea that we could |
00:42:50.57 | Reason Bradley | create something that has a little more longevity. In that, we found the hardest part was the whole permitting process and getting approval for getting the sea line put back on the rocks. But it sounds like we've made some good hit with that. And so at this point, we've designed a whole, basically a mold to design this cone-shaped form for the concrete to get poured and cast into, and that'll have these big bronze bolts cast into it that it'll sit on. So it's been really kind of a fun project for us. We've learned quite a bit about the history and some of the metallurgy and how it got installed. The first time, I think, was kind of in the middle of the night with some concrete, and some people carried it down and set it in there. but |
00:43:40.97 | Reason Bradley | Times have changed and we've approached it in a whole different way. So I think that we're getting very close on the 24th and 25th of this month. We're supposed to go out and pressure wash the whole site and drill into some of the rocks and put a fiberglass rebar in instead of steel. So it's it's non-conductive. And and we got some really good concrete design that's supposed to do real well in saltwater. So that was the goal, basically, is kind of how do we make this not happen again. So the hope is that we'll be long gone. |
00:44:21.98 | Reason Bradley | And the sea lawn will still be there. |
00:44:24.64 | Unknown | Great. Thank you, Reeson, and Mr. Bradley. Thank you. |
00:44:29.99 | Cox | Thank you. |
00:44:31.22 | Cox | May I just say reason it takes a village and we know that you have a whole team of people helping you in this effort. So will you kindly convey our gratitude to them as well? |
00:44:40.91 | Reason Bradley | Well, thank you. And I'd like to thank everyone in Sausalito because it's not just us. There's been a lot of people involved in this that have made it happen. So it's fun to see the whole community rally around that. |
00:44:53.52 | Unknown | Here's a question. |
00:44:54.14 | Reason Bradley | Holly. |
00:44:54.43 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:44:54.51 | Reason Bradley | Sure. |
00:44:54.65 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:44:54.80 | Reason Bradley | Thank you. |
00:44:55.46 | Reason Bradley | the 24th and 25th. |
00:44:56.99 | Councilman Hoffman | Any of your team here? |
00:44:59.19 | Reason Bradley | No, but there's... |
00:44:59.22 | Councilman Hoffman | No, but there's... |
00:45:00.72 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you. |
00:45:01.11 | Councilman Hoffman | Let's go. |
00:45:01.40 | Kevin McGowan | Sure. |
00:45:01.62 | Councilman Hoffman | you |
00:45:01.65 | Kevin McGowan | Thank you. |
00:45:02.17 | Mary Hudson | Thank you. |
00:45:02.21 | Kevin McGowan | Thank you. |
00:45:02.24 | Mary Hudson | You know. |
00:45:02.88 | Reason Bradley | Yeah, the sculpture itself. |
00:45:06.28 | Reason Bradley | What about the date? The date? The 24th and 5th is when we're going to put the... |
00:45:12.62 | Reason Bradley | cast the concrete and then July 1st is when they're talking about putting the sea line back on the pedestal. |
00:45:22.66 | Reason Bradley | Yeah. |
00:45:24.47 | Reason Bradley | of |
00:45:25.97 | Mary Hudson | Do you have anything to add? Yeah, I'm Mary Hudson. I'm on the board of trustees for the Sausalito Foundation. So this has been the third time we've been through the episode of the sea line needing to be restored and put back out there. And it's been a really good experience. The community has been hugely supportive. We have raised lots of funds, enough funds to take care of the restoration and the installation, and also to establish a long-term maintenance to take care of the electrolysis problem that Reason just described. We don't know quite yet how much funding is going to be left for that, but we'll find out soon. |
00:46:08.17 | Mary Hudson | And I want to say it's been a pleasure, by the way, for us to work with the city staff. You've got a couple of dynamite people. |
00:46:15.55 | Mary Hudson | Katie Togarcia, who stepped in when it really wasn't her job. And then your new project manager, Sarah Kerstifar. They've both been great. |
00:46:26.21 | Mary Hudson | Now I just want to say that we're planning a party. |
00:46:30.85 | Mary Hudson | And, um, |
00:46:32.03 | Mary Hudson | You'll all be getting invitations. |
00:46:34.40 | Mary Hudson | And it's partly due to the fact that the Trident has stepped up as they did with financial support for the project. Now they're going to allow us to use the entire Trident restaurant. |
00:46:46.76 | Mary Hudson | for a big celebration when, uh, |
00:46:49.28 | Mary Hudson | when C-line is back in. That date is tentatively set |
00:46:53.89 | Mary Hudson | the celebration date tentatively set for July 17. And it will be a... |
00:46:59.71 | Mary Hudson | no-host, not a no-host, complimentary drinks and food, and you'll all be getting invitations. |
00:47:06.24 | Mary Hudson | Any questions? |
00:47:07.96 | Unknown | Any questions? Thank you. |
00:47:10.96 | Mary Hudson | Thank you. |
00:47:11.00 | Unknown | Okay. |
00:47:12.20 | Unknown | Thank you. And then just one note of personal privilege. There was an issue brought up over the past several meetings concerning a |
00:47:21.48 | Unknown | allegation of a conflict of interest regarding my participation in business improvement district and that unfortunately took the form of a sworn complaint to the fppc uh and i would like just to report to my colleagues in the community that that complaint was formally uh closed and rejected by the fppc its case number is zero four two two two zero two four dash zero one three one eight and you can go to the fppc website and see its current status is closed closed, complaint rejected. So that's just a matter of interest for everyone. |
00:47:51.33 | Unknown | We'll now move on to the action minutes of |
00:47:54.57 | Cox | Mayor, before we move on, may I? Sure. So we have an item on our agenda tonight, 5C, and the proponent reached out to the agenda setting committee around four o'clock this afternoon to ask that we continue the item. |
00:48:09.15 | Cox | Um, |
00:48:10.26 | Cox | So the item is on the agenda. We will take public comment on the item, but I am formally moving to continue the item to our first meeting in July. |
00:48:23.31 | Kellerman | I will second that. |
00:48:24.02 | Unknown | I think that we should save that motion for when the item is actually in front of us. I mean, you've given notice that you're gonna make that motion. |
00:48:24.03 | Cox | I think that's... |
00:48:32.18 | Cox | I've made a motion. There's a motion pending with a second. |
00:48:35.22 | Unknown | Well, I just looked to the... |
00:48:37.52 | Unknown | City Attorney for guidance on that it seems like it would be a courtesy to have Councilmember Blossene here, even though it seems like there may be a majority for that action. |
00:48:49.48 | Unknown | Nevertheless, it seems like the appropriate time to continue item is when the item is actually going to be heard. |
00:48:54.71 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:48:54.74 | Unknown | I think. |
00:48:56.48 | Unknown | Yeah, since you do have to open the item and take public comment on it, I would recommend that you vote after the public comment is closed. |
00:49:05.07 | Unknown | Thank you, City Attorney. So we'll table that motion and bring it up again during the item at hand. Sorry, it's- |
00:49:11.27 | Kellerman | Sorry, if I may, Mayor, this is a matter of adopting the agenda. Is that what the Vice Mayor was articulating? |
00:49:18.76 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:49:19.92 | Kellerman | So we're just looking for a continuance, not any type of |
00:49:23.59 | Kellerman | on the marriage. |
00:49:24.97 | Cox | It's on the agenda for direction. So all I'm seeking to do is continue the item at the request of the proponent. |
00:49:31.94 | Cox | So I don't know why we wouldn't entertain that request from the proponent. We've certainly done that in the past. |
00:49:38.96 | Unknown | Thanks, but the appropriate time for that is when the agenda item is being heard, not now. |
00:49:45.08 | Unknown | You've signaled you'll make that motion, but- |
00:49:46.97 | Cox | I've already made the motion. The motion is pending, and it's been seconded. I don't. |
00:49:49.88 | Unknown | Think of motions proper city attorney. |
00:49:52.46 | Unknown | Yeah, I am concerned about |
00:49:54.97 | Unknown | The council voting to take action on an item on the agenda before you take public comment. So I would suggest that we take public comment before we vote. |
00:50:02.55 | Unknown | To continue this, to discuss it, |
00:50:04.64 | Unknown | you know, or take any further action on the agenda item. |
00:50:07.98 | Cox | City Attorney, I'll just point out that at the end of every evening, many meetings this year, we have announced that we are continuing an item in advance of taking public comment on that item. |
00:50:20.59 | Cox | Numerous items as we reach the end of the evening. |
00:50:25.53 | Unknown | Yes. Um, I, I acknowledge that that has occurred. Um, |
00:50:30.71 | Cox | So I don't know why this motion would be treated differently from how we've conducted business the rest of this year. |
00:50:36.84 | Unknown | Well... |
00:50:37.75 | Unknown | I... |
00:50:38.78 | Unknown | I think we were giving notice that that was our intention. And I know we've sometimes been a little sloppy in our process, but the actual definitive action of continuing the matter is when the item is being heard, not |
00:50:49.70 | Unknown | So it was fair notice to the audience that we were going to continue the matter. And so people could decide. That's why I'm doing this. |
00:50:54.78 | Cox | That's why I'm doing this now. That's why I'm doing this now. |
00:50:56.03 | Unknown | That's why I'm doing this now. So I think that's fair notice that there probably is going to be a vote to continue the matter, but that's going to be a vote later in the evening when Councilmember Blaustein is here, I presume. |
00:51:04.75 | Cox | So city attorney, are you telling us not to vote on this pending motion, given our course of conduct in numerous prior meetings this year? |
00:51:14.99 | Unknown | What? |
00:51:15.26 | Cox | Thank you. |
00:51:16.53 | Unknown | I would suggest that it is. |
00:51:19.97 | Unknown | is best practice for us to wait for the agenda to be called for us to take public comment and then for us to have |
00:51:26.59 | Unknown | have a vote on whether to continue the item or not to continue the item. |
00:51:32.61 | Cox | Are you instructing us not to take action on this pending motion that's been seconded? |
00:51:37.64 | Unknown | That would be my recommendation, yes. |
00:51:40.37 | Unknown | I'm going to take that recommendation as the parliamentarians guidance to us and move on with the. |
00:51:44.24 | Kellerman | Yeah, so mayor I'd like to just put onto the record though Mr city attorney, we defer to you on every occasion and I just like for the record, this is an inconsistent practice based on prior action by this Council, and our mayor and Vice mayor on prior actions, so I feel uncomfortable with this and I just want to put that in for the record, thank you. |
00:52:02.82 | Unknown | So the action items of the previous meeting, adopting the minutes of the June 4th, 2024 city council meeting. Is there a motion to approve the minutes? |
00:52:13.31 | Mayor Sobieski | Uh, |
00:52:13.53 | Unknown | I'll make that motion to approve the June |
00:52:14.63 | Mayor Sobieski | to prove their children. |
00:52:15.37 | Mayor Sobieski | Can we ask him to pull a comment first? |
00:52:16.97 | Unknown | Oh yes, thank you very much. See, are there any city, any public comment on the adopting the minutes from the June 4th, 2024 City Council meeting? |
00:52:27.67 | Unknown | Seeing no public comments in the room. How about online, Mr. City Clerk? |
00:52:31.08 | Mayor Sobieski | See you, man. |
00:52:32.15 | Unknown | All right, we'll close public comment and we will now ask for a motion to approve the |
00:52:36.77 | Unknown | Minutes. I'll make the motion to approve it. Is there a second? I'll second. All right. A motion made and seconded. Any discussion? No discussion. All in favor say aye. Aye. |
00:52:46.20 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:52:46.22 | Unknown | Bye. |
00:52:46.59 | Unknown | Bye. |
00:52:46.68 | Unknown | I'm sorry. |
00:52:46.76 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:52:46.79 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:52:46.83 | Unknown | Thank you. |
00:52:48.35 | Unknown | All right. The minutes are adopted. |
00:52:50.98 | Unknown | Now we move on to the consent calendar. |
00:52:52.92 | Unknown | These are for items generally considered routine and non-controversial, and they require no discussion. |
00:52:58.74 | Unknown | They're expected to have unanimous Council support and may be enacted by the Council on one motion. |
00:53:02.99 | Unknown | in the form listed below. |
00:53:04.78 | Unknown | There'll be no separate discussion of consent items. However, a city council member may request that an item be removed from the calendar. |
00:53:10.76 | Unknown | and we will then discuss it later in today's meeting. |
00:53:13.51 | Unknown | The first item is the June 10th National Freedom Day Proclamation, which I will read out loud in a moment. The second is the Gun Violence Awareness Day Proclamation. The third is the Alzheimer's Brain Awareness Month Proclamation, which I will also read out loud. |
00:53:28.26 | Unknown | the |
00:53:29.20 | Unknown | 4th is a reappointment of Mr. Andrew Junius to the Planning Commission for a three-year term commencing on July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2027. 3E is waiving the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 3-2024, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Sausalito, setting fees for sewer services for fiscal year 2024-25 through fiscal year 26-27. Pursuant to Article 13, |
00:53:55.88 | Unknown | x three eyes and a d section six of the california constitution on the proposed sanitary sewer fees for fiscal year 24 25 through 26 27. 3f adopt a resolution authorizing the city manager to award the construction contract of 429.5 johnson street tenant improvement project to mars construction in an amount of 309 000 and authorize a construction contingency for the project in an amount of $81,000. Receive and file the employee retention recruitment update is 3G. Before I read the proclamations, is there any item that anyone wishes to remove? |
00:54:32.31 | Councilman Hoffman | I don't want to remove this item, but item 3D, which is reappointment of Andrew Junius. |
00:54:39.57 | Councilman Hoffman | The staff report, I sent an email to the city manager and our city clerk. The staff report had some inaccuracies in it. It looked like it was part of a staff report that was copied, cut and pasted from last summer. And so also on process. And I had expected the process for appointments to second terms on the planning commission to be included in the staff report. That's why I was looking through it, because we had a lot of discussion about this last summer. |
00:55:11.45 | Councilman Hoffman | So, |
00:55:13.27 | Councilman Hoffman | I believe our current policy is that if you are up for your second term on the Planning Commission, that we are not going to post that as an open position. We are not going to take applications and we're not going to vote on that. We're going to merely reappoint if the, absent some other issue, if the commissioner elects that they would want to do a second term. |
00:55:39.91 | Councilman Hoffman | Is that? Okay. |
00:55:41.72 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you. |
00:55:41.74 | Cox | That was not my understanding. My understanding was we were not going to abdicate our responsibility for reviewing and considering an appointment, but that we would put it on consent. But we're not going to just automatically reappoint without considering other applications. |
00:55:58.98 | Councilman Hoffman | Fair enough. So my question then is, did we post this and did we solicit applications for this position and post it as open? |
00:56:09.46 | Mayor Sobieski | So the city website continually gets applications. There was no opening period because there was no vacancy or term expiration. And it was directed that we put on the agenda to reappoint Mr. Andrew Junius. |
00:56:27.70 | Councilman Hoffman | So I think that's an ambiguity in our process. And it seems to me that we haven't correctly followed the process. And I just want to be clear, because I don't want to have questions about it later. |
00:56:42.47 | Unknown | I asked the same question. So my understanding of the answer, Councilmember, is that we recently had those interviews for the open commission that David Marlott was posted and that there were those applications still |
00:56:55.19 | Unknown | in submittal from there were a few candidates that and that's what city clerk also verified is that the that he would still accept these and so it's certainly our prerogative if you if anyone so chose to pull this off consent not appoint Mr junius and instead make a motion to appoint one of the people we recently interviewed a few months back. |
00:57:15.65 | Councilman Hoffman | Well, I think my concern is a little bit different. |
00:57:20.76 | Councilman Hoffman | I think if we're going to consider, as I believe that's what our Vice Mayor just said, is that we're going to consider |
00:57:27.56 | Councilman Hoffman | other appointments, but |
00:57:29.03 | Councilman Hoffman | based on prior applications or maybe even new applications. |
00:57:33.21 | Councilman Hoffman | I think if it's unclear to me, then it must be unclear to other people. And if we haven't, |
00:57:37.60 | Councilman Hoffman | notice this as an open |
00:57:41.20 | Councilman Hoffman | or not open, but as a, well, a re-employment. And if you're interested, either indicate that if you've been, you know, if you've been interviewed before, are you still interested? So I think it's a, I understand it's a fine tuning of sort of how we're taking direction. I just want to make sure that we're following the same process and we're fair and open and transparent about the way we're doing business. And so I'm not going to, what I would request is that we follow that process, which I think the vice mayor just indicated. |
00:58:16.97 | Councilman Hoffman | this term is expiring, that the first term is expiring. Perhaps it is notice that the term is expiring. |
00:58:28.56 | Councilman Hoffman | Karen Hollweg, You know he has indicated that the current and sitting member can serve two terms he's indicated that he is willing to do another term, but you know anybody interested should either present an application and if you've been interviewed in the last whatever year if you're still interested, you know, let us know, I mean I think. Karen Hollweg, I think that's what we're doing. |
00:58:50.23 | Councilman Hoffman | Is that anybody just I mean, I think that's what we're doing. So I think. |
00:58:52.66 | Unknown | I think in this case we had our application so recently that we are welcome to appoint someone else if we want to pull this off consent. |
00:58:59.36 | Councilman Hoffman | We haven't properly noticed it. We haven't properly noticed it, too, that this seat is expiring, that it's open, and that, you know, if you're interested, submit an application. I mean, I think that we should follow that. If that's our process, I support that. But I think we need to clearly follow that procedure from now going forward. And I would hope that that would be in the minutes, and I would hope that for any future cycles for the Planning Commission that someone would be able to easily find this process and follow it. |
00:59:33.80 | Unknown | So you're giving that extra clarification to our city clerk for future process. |
00:59:38.64 | Councilman Hoffman | To everybody. And if it's in the minutes, then we should be able to reference it and say, no, at this meeting we clarified and this is the process. And I would expect Commissioner Junius' application to be on the next city council meeting. |
00:59:50.71 | Unknown | So you're asking it to be pulled from the agenda? Yeah. From the consent matter? Yes. |
00:59:53.02 | Councilman Hoffman | Yeah, yes. |
00:59:54.42 | Councilman Hoffman | Yeah, and properly noticed and followed the procedure that we outlined. |
00:59:55.15 | Unknown | I'm not properly noticed. |
00:59:56.80 | Unknown | right so we'll pull that out i'm actually just going to put it first on the agenda because it's a business because the otherwise there'll be a vacancy at the next city uh planning commission meeting |
01:00:05.93 | Unknown | So we'll hear that matter first on our business agenda. |
01:00:09.61 | Unknown | Oh, no. |
01:00:10.55 | Councilman Hoffman | No, it doesn't need to go in the business agenda. Just put it on the consent calendar. |
01:00:13.27 | Unknown | No, the question of whether we have to have a proper discussion about the matter. I think there's more. Sorry. So from the consent calendar, putting out the first business item. |
01:00:17.36 | Councilman Hoffman | Oh, sorry. |
01:00:18.37 | Councilman Hoffman | Oh, okay. |
01:00:21.57 | Unknown | of this meeting. Anything else to come off consent? |
01:00:26.40 | Unknown | It should, I hope, be quick. If it's not quick, I mean, it seems like... |
01:00:29.25 | Councilman Hoffman | I think I just... |
01:00:30.03 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you. |
01:00:30.13 | Unknown | I don't think that we need a lot of discussion about the process, but let's just either agree or not and move on. So let me just read out loud the proclamation of the city of Sausalito declaring June 19, 2024 as Juneteenth National Freedom Day, whereas on September 22, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, |
01:00:30.35 | Councilman Hoffman | Just summarize it. |
01:00:34.30 | Unknown | Great. |
01:00:51.43 | Unknown | officially ending slavery, changing the status of more than 3.5 million enslaved African-Americans in the Confederate States of America. |
01:00:59.07 | Unknown | And whereas in remembrance and celebration of the June 19th, |
01:01:02.63 | Unknown | 1865 announcement of the abolition of slavery. We celebrate Juneteenth. |
01:01:06.97 | Unknown | also known as emancipation day or freedom day as the true anniversary |
01:01:12.08 | Unknown | an oldest known celebration commemorating the end of slavery in the United States, and whereas those who were free from bondage celebrated their long-overdue emancipation on June 19th, today our city commemorates, on the 19th, our city commemorates Juneteenth, a chance to celebrate human freedom, reflect on the grievous and ongoing legacy of slavery, we dedicate ourselves to rooting out the systemic racism that continues to plague our society as we strive to deliver the full promise of America to every American. And whereas on Juneteenth we recommit to our shared work to ensure racial justice, equity, and equality in America, we commemorate the centuries of struggle and progress led by abolitionists, educators, civil rights advocates, lawyers, activists, trade unionists, religious leaders, public officials, and everyday Americans who have brought our communities closer to fulfilling its promise. Now therefore, be it resolved that I, |
01:02:05.34 | Unknown | Ian Sobieski, Mayor of the City of Sausalito and the City Council of Sausalito, hereby proclaim June 19, 2024 as Juneteenth National Freedom Day and encourage the community to unite in solidarity and continue to fight for justice. That proclamation will be read aloud and given at a Juneteenth celebration tomorrow. |
01:02:24.64 | Unknown | I would also like to rectify having missed reading last |
01:02:28.95 | Unknown | month at the last city council meeting. |
01:02:30.79 | Unknown | the proclamation of the city of Sausalito about Alzheimer's and brain awareness month. |
01:02:35.21 | Unknown | Whereas over 6 million Americans live with Alzheimer's disease, a form of dementia that deprives people of their precious memories, thoughts, and identity. During National Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month, we honor the extraordinary courage and strength and resilience of people facing this devastating disease. We recognize the support of families and caregivers who stand by their loved ones' side and help them age with dignity. We resolve to continue advancing scientific research and treatment options to ensure a brighter future for all Americans facing Alzheimer's. And whereas Alzheimer's remains a leading cause of death in older adults, it exacts an emotional, physical, and financial toll on the entire family of those who are diagnosed, especially for African Americans and Latinos who are more likely to develop symptoms of dementia than other races and ethnicities. And for individuals with Down syndrome who are at higher risk. |
01:03:27.50 | Unknown | of Alzheimer's. |
01:03:28.80 | Unknown | And whereas we recognize the millions of Americans who are living with the impact of this condition every day and all the incredible caregivers, doctors, researchers and advocates supporting them. And whereas we call on the people to support those living with Alzheimer's and the many people who continue to show extraordinary and tireless effort to combat this disorder. Now, therefore, the mayor and city of Sausalito, the city council of the city of Sausalito, proclaim June 2024 as Alzheimer's and brain awareness month in the city of Sausalito, the city council of the city of Sausalito proclaim June 2024 as Alzheimer's and brain awareness month in the city of Sausalito. |
01:04:00.51 | Unknown | So with that reading and with item 3D removed and put at the beginning of our business calendars, our motion to approve the consent calendar. Public comment. Oh, thank you very much, C clerks. |
01:04:09.12 | Mayor Sobieski | Uh, |
01:04:11.31 | Cox | I also have a question about one item on the |
01:04:13.74 | Unknown | A question, please, for me. |
01:04:13.76 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:04:15.24 | Cox | Thank you. And I think Kevin McGowan is here. My question is on item 3F. We are approving a construction contract in the amount of $309,000. We have a contingency in the amount of $81,000. |
01:04:29.37 | Cox | typically contingencies are 10 or 20%. This contingency is a huge percentage of the total project. And so I was wondering why such a large contingency. |
01:04:40.47 | McDougall | Send them. |
01:04:44.20 | McDougall | to be interested. |
01:04:44.96 | Unknown | Hello, Director McGowan. The Vice Mayor has a question for you. |
01:04:47.19 | Cox | Sorry, I didn't realize you weren't in the room. This is on item 3F for the Mars construction contract. We're awarding a contract in the amount of $309,000 and authorizing contingency in the amount of $81,000. Typically, contingency is 10 or 20%. This is a very large percentage contingency, and I was just curious as to why. |
01:05:06.16 | Kevin McGowan | Yes, it's a remodel project, interior work. It's a little bit different than our normal roadway projects, so to have a normal 10% contingency, since we don't know everything about the building, especially when we open it up, we are recommending that you have an additional contingency in order to address these inconsistencies as they come up. |
01:05:26.42 | Cox | And is this covered by our grant funding? |
01:05:29.07 | Kevin McGowan | Yes. |
01:05:29.38 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:05:29.71 | Cox | Okay, I'm good. Thank you so much. |
01:05:33.61 | Unknown | Yeah. |
01:05:36.46 | Unknown | I was going to actually ask for a graph to be shown from the last consent item, but I think I'll just ask Chad, just be prepared if you would. I'd love to see the churn slide from the consent item shown as part of the business item on finance when you get a chance. |
01:05:49.24 | Unknown | There are public comment, please, from the audience. |
01:05:51.70 | Mayor Sobieski | Jeff Jacobs. |
01:05:55.78 | Jeff Jacobs | Greetings, Mr. Mayor, City Council, City Employees. |
01:06:01.28 | Jeff Jacobs | Citizens of Sausalito? |
01:06:04.59 | Jeff Jacobs | And those anchored out on Rainbow Bay |
01:06:09.39 | Jeff Jacobs | This is about item number 3A, Juneteenth. |
01:06:14.65 | Jeff Jacobs | Juneteenth. |
01:06:16.89 | Jeff Jacobs | is the belated discovery |
01:06:20.78 | Jeff Jacobs | that the slaves had been freed. |
01:06:24.34 | Jeff Jacobs | It was more than months after the war ended. |
01:06:27.78 | Jeff Jacobs | It was years after the Emancipation Proclamation. |
01:06:31.04 | Jeff Jacobs | as well. |
01:06:33.01 | Jeff Jacobs | For the first 30 years, |
01:06:36.27 | Jeff Jacobs | It was called Jubilee Day. |
01:06:39.81 | Jeff Jacobs | My 27 foot sloop is called Jubilee 2. |
01:06:44.42 | Jeff Jacobs | And |
01:06:45.68 | Jeff Jacobs | I'd like this item renamed. |
01:06:48.74 | Jeff Jacobs | to Jubilee. |
01:06:52.01 | Jeff Jacobs | Isaiah 61 says, the spirit of the Lord God is upon me because the Lord has anointed me to bring good tidings unto the humble. |
01:07:01.76 | Jeff Jacobs | He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted. |
01:07:04.53 | Jeff Jacobs | to proclaim liberty of the captives, |
01:07:07.27 | Jeff Jacobs | the opening of the eyes to them that are bound. |
01:07:13.31 | Jeff Jacobs | So Jubilee means... |
01:07:15.45 | Jeff Jacobs | that the captives and the slaves are set free. |
01:07:18.96 | Jeff Jacobs | Sausalito Police Department has been much better, especially on houseless people in anchor outs the past few years. I appreciate that. |
01:07:27.62 | Jeff Jacobs | We still have millions in prison in America, more per capita than any other country. |
01:07:33.56 | Jeff Jacobs | The debts are forgiven. |
01:07:35.51 | Jeff Jacobs | that everything does not revolve around money. Even the farmer has to wrest the land. |
01:07:41.27 | Jeff Jacobs | for a year. |
01:07:43.11 | Jeff Jacobs | and that everybody is given an equal portion |
01:07:46.21 | Jeff Jacobs | of land to live on. |
01:07:48.14 | Jeff Jacobs | Not equal in area, but equal in value. |
01:07:53.30 | Jeff Jacobs | Sounds like a good message to me. |
01:07:57.32 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
01:07:57.91 | Mayor Sobieski | Any other public comment? Yeah, Bet MacDougall. |
01:07:58.13 | Peter Van Meter | Bye-bye. |
01:08:07.26 | McDougall | Thank you. |
01:08:08.03 | McDougall | Thank you. |
01:08:08.05 | Unknown | Thank you. |
01:08:08.07 | McDougall | Thank you. |
01:08:08.79 | McDougall | Are we allowed to speak to any of these things that were just like... |
01:08:11.66 | Unknown | Any of the consent calendar items. |
01:08:13.33 | McDougall | Including the one that is going to be pulled. |
01:08:15.20 | Unknown | Except for Mr. Junius's item, that's going to be the next business item. |
01:08:18.29 | McDougall | All right. |
01:08:19.09 | Unknown | So no comments on that here. |
01:08:20.81 | McDougall | Thank you. |
01:08:21.18 | Unknown | I'll reserve. Thank you. |
01:08:21.25 | Mayor Sobieski | I'll reserve. |
01:08:21.74 | McDougall | Thank you. |
01:08:25.03 | Unknown | Thank you. |
01:08:25.04 | Mayor Sobieski | All right. Yeah, we have online we have civil booty. |
01:08:33.70 | Unknown | Miss Boutillier, go right ahead. |
01:08:38.81 | Sybil Boutillier | Um, |
01:08:40.85 | Sybil Boutillier | Good evening. Can you hear me OK? I'm a little hoarse. |
01:08:44.60 | Unknown | I can hear you just fine. Please go right ahead. |
01:08:46.63 | Sybil Boutillier | Yes, sir. |
01:08:47.69 | Sybil Boutillier | So we greatly appreciate your willingness |
01:08:50.52 | Sybil Boutillier | to focus a moment of attention on the proclamation, |
01:08:56.01 | Sybil Boutillier | excuse me, Alzheimer's month |
01:08:59.16 | Sybil Boutillier | So, |
01:09:00.04 | Sybil Boutillier | and its meaning for the elder community here in South Salido and throughout Morin. |
01:09:04.65 | Sybil Boutillier | There's no adult daycare for folks with memory issues in the County of Marin at this time. |
01:09:11.53 | Sybil Boutillier | So if family members need respite from daily care, |
01:09:15.74 | Sybil Boutillier | They need to arrange for their loved ones to be transported |
01:09:19.15 | Sybil Boutillier | to San Francisco or Roanoke Park, |
01:09:21.68 | Sybil Boutillier | for daycare programs, and elder advocates are working to resolve this. But we also need more residential home-like care settings for folks who need more assistance and can no longer be cared for at home by family and friends. These and more support services |
01:09:40.49 | Sybil Boutillier | for family caregivers and better benefits for paid caregivers are all needed |
01:09:47.73 | Sybil Boutillier | as according to the Alzheimer's Association in 2024, one in nine persons over age 65 are living with Alzheimer's disease. |
01:10:00.17 | Sybil Boutillier | So I want to thank you for acknowledging this important issue. |
01:10:03.97 | Sybil Boutillier | by proclaiming the month of June, Alzheimer's and Brain Awareness Month, |
01:10:08.37 | Sybil Boutillier | And. |
01:10:08.96 | Sybil Boutillier | Thank you. |
01:10:13.62 | Mayor Sobieski | All right, Scott Thornburg. |
01:10:19.56 | Scott Thornburg | Hi, good evening, Council. Thank you for your attention tonight. I just wanted to say congratulations to the city manager for a great staff report. The numbers around staff churn I was really impressed by, and I just wanted to thank him publicly for the hard work. I know it's a challenging time, and just wanted to say thank you to him. Also, in one of our recent budget discussions, I do think there was a stray comment around cuts to staff. And I just want to publicly say from the community that we really value our staff. We really appreciate the hard work. |
01:10:51.72 | Scott Thornburg | And I would encourage you to discontinue any |
01:10:54.83 | Scott Thornburg | consideration. |
01:10:55.96 | Scott Thornburg | of cutting back any of our staff members as part of your budget discussions this evening. |
01:11:01.56 | Scott Thornburg | The report from the city manager, I think, was exceptional and shows the hard work and dedication of our staff, and we should really be applauding them in their efforts. So thank you for that, and enjoy the rest of your evening here. |
01:11:19.30 | Mayor Sobieski | And Sandra Bushmaker. |
01:11:22.03 | Sandra Bushmuth | Good evening, counsel. Thank you so much for the proclamation regarding Alzheimer's and other brain issues. |
01:11:28.41 | Sandra Bushmuth | You may not be aware, but I'm a long-term care ombudsman for the county of Marin. |
01:11:33.52 | Sandra Bushmuth | And I routinely visit the facilities to which I'm assigned, many of which have memory care issues. And I just, I think it's really an important thing. I endorse Sybil's comments about the need for further care in this area, and I hope we can |
01:11:50.50 | Sandra Bushmuth | you know, raise it to our consciousness here in Sausalito. |
01:11:53.87 | Sandra Bushmuth | So just wanted to let you know that I appreciate the proclamation. Thank you. |
01:12:01.30 | Mayor Sobieski | Okay, no further public comment. |
01:12:02.31 | Unknown | it. |
01:12:02.41 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
01:12:04.28 | Unknown | All right, we'll close public comment on that and we will vote on the consent. Oh, I think you had a question, Vice Mayor. No, did I mess it up? No, I was gonna make a motion. Oh yes, okay. Let's have a motion please. |
01:12:09.38 | Cox | Did I mess it up? |
01:12:12.42 | Cox | I move approval of consent items 3A through 3C and 3E through 3G. |
01:12:20.67 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:12:21.38 | Cox | Second. |
01:12:22.07 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
01:12:22.81 | Unknown | All right. Any discussion? Seeing none, let's have a vote. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? |
01:12:27.34 | Blaustein | Hi. |
01:12:28.65 | Unknown | None opposed consent item consent calendar is approved. There are no public hearing items. The first business item will be the reappointment of Andrew Junius to the planning commission for a three year term commencing on July 1, 2024 and in July 30, 2027. Is there any staffs available to answer any questions? I guess the city clerk already answered some. It's formally on the table for any discussion. |
01:12:54.60 | Councilman Hoffman | So I'll just summarize my comments before. I am concerned that it's not clear what our process is for reappointment to second terms for the Planning Commission. So we had some discussion about this last summer. |
01:13:12.78 | Councilman Hoffman | And the vice mayor summarized it. I'm not gonna be able to summarize it. |
01:13:18.31 | Councilman Hoffman | Do you want to repeat your summary? |
01:13:20.85 | Councilman Hoffman | I mean, I think we need to know, I think there was a, we didn't, I think we are deficient in our process. This time around, I think we need to notice it, that this term is expiring, that we, |
01:13:33.59 | Councilman Hoffman | We were going to do a reappointment and that if you are interested in it, you should put your |
01:13:37.48 | Councilman Hoffman | application in or that you should notice |
01:13:40.42 | Cox | Yeah, I think we did not want to abdicate our appointment authority by automatically reappointing without consideration. And so when someone's term is expiring, we make it known that the term is expiring, and we invite the... |
01:13:57.68 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:13:57.77 | Cox | existing holder to reapply, but we also open it up to other applications so that we're reappointing with full knowledge. But because they are embarking on a second term, we're going to put it on consent. So then unless there's a reason not to reappoint, it's a matter of routine. |
01:14:18.02 | Councilman Hoffman | So I would like that summary highlighted in the minutes, please. |
01:14:23.82 | Councilman Hoffman | And therefore, next time this comes up, we just pull up in the minutes or maybe somebody could add it to their notes and that this is noticed properly in the next agenda. And I would suspect I would expect that this would be on the consent calendar at the next agenda. And it's not this isn't a comment. |
01:14:41.63 | Councilman Hoffman | at all on Commissioner Junius, I want to make sure that that we're following the process. |
01:14:45.62 | Councilman Hoffman | equally for everybody that comes up and especially the next time it comes up that we're acting consistently going forward. |
01:14:53.40 | Unknown | Any other discussion about what to do with this? Because I agree with that process. What do we do with this reappointment? Do we want to do it today or not? |
01:14:59.45 | Councilman Hoffman | Add it to your children. |
01:15:01.54 | Councilman Hoffman | No, I think we're insufficient in our noticing process because we didn't notice it as open and we didn't solicit new applications or people that we've already interviewed. So I think it needs to be |
01:15:14.97 | Councilman Hoffman | on the next agenda. I mean, you guys are the genociding, so however you wanna do it. |
01:15:18.04 | Cox | Well, |
01:15:18.67 | Cox | If we put it on the next agenda, I would like to extend Commissioner Junius' term until such time as he is reappointed. |
01:15:29.70 | Cox | or not. |
01:15:31.39 | Unknown | No. |
01:15:31.44 | Cox | That way we don't have a vacancy on the planning committee. |
01:15:33.74 | Unknown | I thought that came up before city attorney, sorry to bother you, and I'm sorry to nitpick on this, but this was exactly, I thought the dynamic we had before, and that was a problem. Event radically. |
01:15:41.84 | Cox | event ratified the actions taken during the time of extension in order to address any challenges |
01:15:48.96 | Unknown | Are we is that possible to be done city attorney. |
01:15:53.55 | Unknown | Thank you. |
01:15:53.56 | Unknown | So given the scope of the agenda item, I don't think that you can discuss or consider appointment of other individuals. This is a consent calendar item for the reappointment of one specific person. My suggestion here would be that if you want to appoint him for a fixed term until... |
01:16:12.33 | Unknown | you know, |
01:16:13.43 | Unknown | for the next month to address that risk, that would probably be the safest and more |
01:16:19.35 | Unknown | conservative approach to dealing with that problem rather than ratifying the actions after the fact. |
01:16:25.02 | Sybil Boutillier | It sets a precedent. |
01:16:27.74 | Sybil Boutillier | Thank you. |
01:16:29.76 | Unknown | Please. |
01:16:30.20 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:16:30.23 | Unknown | Sorry, someone needs to be muted. |
01:16:32.83 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:16:33.56 | Unknown | So vice versa. |
01:16:33.57 | Cox | So how is anybody able to talk? |
01:16:37.07 | Mayor Sobieski | Sorry, we got something to mute then. |
01:16:39.18 | Unknown | So vice mayor, is that your- |
01:16:40.98 | Cox | My motion is that we continue this item to the consent calendar for our first meeting in July, that we reappoint what? |
01:16:54.53 | Cox | Oh, |
01:16:55.92 | Unknown | Yeah, this was just a discussion. Sorry. That's okay. |
01:16:57.23 | Cox | Sorry. |
01:16:58.47 | Cox | You've asked me for a motion. |
01:16:59.80 | Unknown | I was actually just seeing if that was where you were kind of going. I want to give Councilmember Blaustein an opportunity to |
01:17:05.92 | Unknown | Chime in and then Councilmember Kellerman. |
01:17:07.54 | Blaustein | No, that's okay. I'm fine with that. I just had wanted to clarify or suggest because previously when we, for instance, were waiting to fill appointments on Parks and Rec or otherwise, typically commissioners sat, but I understand that was discussed, so you addressed that concern. I just wanted to make sure we had the ability to continue the planning commission's next meeting. |
01:17:25.62 | Unknown | That's Reverend Kelman. |
01:17:26.93 | Kellerman | Nothing more, Mayor. I think the Vice Mayor articulated it correctly. |
01:17:30.48 | Unknown | Okay, so now we will take public comment. |
01:17:34.10 | Unknown | Thank you. |
01:17:34.66 | Unknown | Ha ha. |
01:17:36.52 | Unknown | Uh, |
01:17:37.78 | Unknown | So public comment on this matter, please. City clerk. |
01:17:40.65 | Mayor Sobieski | All right, well, we'll start with Michael Rex. |
01:17:49.72 | Michael Rex | I'm Michael Racks, local architect. The appointment of a planning commissioner, they play a very important role in our government services. I think it's important that planning commissioners be, it'd be when their term expires. I agree with what I heard that |
01:18:09.98 | Michael Rex | It should be advertised as an open seat. I don't agree that it should automatically |
01:18:15.21 | Michael Rex | be continued because they wish it so. I think each commissioner, when their term expires, |
01:18:24.09 | Michael Rex | Continuing their term would be based on the merits of the service that they served for the previous years. |
01:18:31.55 | Michael Rex | And I'm very pleased to hear that you're opening it up when that first term expires and that you consider all applicants. And putting it on, I agree with Sergio that the best approach here so we don't have an empty seat is you continue, if Andrew is willing, on a temporary basis until you can hold those interviews and consider the applicants who apply. And I don't quite understand why you put that on the consent calendar next time, but I'll leave that up to you. Thank you. |
01:19:11.42 | Mayor Sobieski | But back to Google. |
01:19:20.54 | McDougall | Thank you. |
01:19:21.97 | McDougall | So I'd like to pick up on a word that the city attorney used. First of all, I'd like to first acknowledge and thank him for being ever present at tonight's meeting. |
01:19:30.02 | McDougall | Clearly he is needed more than he knows. |
01:19:32.45 | McDougall | So he used the word conservative. |
01:19:35.56 | McDougall | So now he's offering conservative advice. |
01:19:38.63 | McDougall | which frankly, I feel pretty good about. |
01:19:40.99 | McDougall | Because in a way, it echoes what Council Member Hoffman is also discussing, and that is the conservative, which is the tried and true, absolutely legal approach to public meetings. |
01:19:51.79 | McDougall | Quite honestly, I have a very different approach of this precedent that was set. |
01:19:56.73 | McDougall | Last year, when Ms. Blaustein gaveled the meetings and Ian Sobieski served as vice mayor, you consistently voted no, sir, according to Rosenberg rules. That disqualifies you from reopening the question, as you did two or three times as the year advanced. |
01:20:12.44 | McDougall | I don't understand why you threw the meeting into illegal territory like that. It only got called out once or twice, but you never got called on the carpet for it. |
01:20:21.23 | McDougall | by choice. So here we have a problem. |
01:20:25.34 | McDougall | You set the stage for precedent with Ms. Feller. |
01:20:29.06 | McDougall | you automatically re-upped her term. You didn't even consider anybody else. You looked at her hard work. |
01:20:36.20 | McDougall | You thought you couldn't live without her. Going forward, it would be a disaster if she wasn't still on the team. So you re-upped her. That set a precedent. |
01:20:45.15 | McDougall | whether you like it or not. |
01:20:47.78 | McDougall | And that's the way I remember this thing playing out. |
01:20:50.68 | McDougall | not the way Vice Mayor Cox currently characterizes it. Thank you. |
01:20:56.99 | Mayor Sobieski | And we do have on Zoom, Andrew Junius. |
01:21:04.11 | Andrew Junius | Good evening, City Council. Thank you for the quick opportunity to speak. I'm certainly in agreement with |
01:21:12.72 | Andrew Junius | returning to |
01:21:14.43 | Andrew Junius | standard procedures in which case, you know, certainly the position should be noticed and anybody interested should be able to apply. I think I actually asked the cloak to do that about a month ago. Apparently it didn't happen. I believe that it had happened. That's why I thought I was on the consent calendar because nobody else had applied. But in the event, I'm totally |
01:21:35.76 | Andrew Junius | in agreement with the process. And I hope, and we'll see what happens. But thank you for the opportunity to comment. |
01:21:49.80 | Unknown | All right, no further public comment. All right, we'll close public comment. And now, does someone wish to make a motion? |
01:21:58.62 | Cox | I do want to address Ms. McDougall's comments. So prior to reappointing Christina Feller and others, we interviewed Planning Commission applicants that evening. |
01:22:10.89 | Cox | And so we did interview people |
01:22:13.82 | Cox | then reappointed Christina Feller so I don't know if if you know not all of members of the public attended the interviews but it was that process that resulted in the process that we're confirming this evening so I move that we move item |
01:22:35.61 | Cox | 3D to the consent calendar for our July 16 meeting. |
01:22:43.44 | Cox | that we |
01:22:44.59 | Cox | that the city clerk advertised the, uh, |
01:22:49.70 | Cox | opening coming up on the Planning Commission, that he distribute to the City Council any applications received, and that we hold interviews the evening of July 16 in advance of the regular meeting, and that we reappoint Andrew Junius as a Planning Commissioner |
01:23:08.57 | Cox | for the period |
01:23:12.43 | Cox | commencing with the |
01:23:14.10 | Cox | With July 1, the termination of his... |
01:23:17.75 | Cox | Um, |
01:23:18.88 | Cox | term. |
01:23:19.62 | Cox | to July... |
01:23:24.85 | Cox | 16 July 17 2024. |
01:23:30.61 | Unknown | So |
01:23:30.67 | Cox | Exactly. |
01:23:30.79 | Unknown | Thank you. |
01:23:30.94 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:23:30.98 | Unknown | Thank you. |
01:23:30.99 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:23:31.28 | Kellerman | I'm happy to second that. |
01:23:31.97 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:23:32.02 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
01:23:32.09 | Cox | Thank you. |
01:23:32.12 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
01:23:32.40 | Unknown | Okay, motion made and seconded. Any discussion? |
01:23:36.21 | Unknown | No discussion, then we'll call the question. All in favor, say aye. |
01:23:39.28 | Unknown | Aye. Opposed. |
01:23:39.33 | Unknown | Bye. |
01:23:40.90 | Unknown | Mayor Mrakas, MNC, In motion carries unanimously when I move on to the business item five a the fiscal year and 2025 budget review city manager. |
01:23:49.03 | Unknown | you know. |
01:23:49.10 | Unknown | Thank you. |
01:23:49.15 | Unknown | Thank you. |
01:23:49.46 | Unknown | Thank you, Mayor, members of the council, members of the public. I'd like to begin this presentation by thanking our finance director and his team, Chad Hess, and our city departments for working to put together the draft budget book that you have in your packet, as well as doing the strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat analysis and looking at budget reduction scenarios, which are all part of the budget packet this evening. I'd also like to say that, you know, budgets reflect the city's values. And when you look at a budget as a resident, as an employee, as an elected official, and you see where you put your money, your resources, you can understand where the values are. And in Sausalio's case, it's always been safety, infrastructure, and quality of life, which is pretty standard in a lot of communities. And when you start your budget process, which is a series of estimates and projections in transit, we get professional help from, use our own experience and past facts, you start with an audit. And in particular, Sausalito, when I got here three years ago this month, you know, there was some need to look at our audit findings, which were really not good at that time. They've since become better through the work of Chad and team. And, you know, the audit is the basis in the beginning for the budget process. So this past year, you may recollect that we got our audit done by the end of December, which was at least two months earlier than the prior year. So that truly was helpful in our budget process. And given that this is my third year in Sausalito, beginning this month, it's my 40th year working on budgets. so I want to tell you all that you don't come to a community and know everything about its finances, its management of its finances. And certainly I didn't come to Saucelito with that. I have begun and am learning it. So I really want to thank the prior councils and administrations that worked before I got here and Chad got here and other people got here to create a strong financial model. And let me tell you about some of the things that they did before 2021. You know, a tourism and occupancy tax that was implemented creates revenue for services. You know, passing Measure O was something that creates resources for infrastructure. You know, being an early adopter of Section 115 trusts, you know, creates a path to dealing with pension challenges. And then the idea that the city would need to have 5% set-asides and 10% set-asides in emergency counts to build reserves was done by prior city councils and city administrations. In the case of this city team, you know, there are things that have been happening to strengthen our financial positions, and that's shown in a lot of the budget data that Chad has put together for you to see. Number one, you know, after coming out of the pandemic, there was obviously, you know, a concern about what would happen to our service levels, what would happen to our budgets with threats to not only our sales tax or tourism and occupancy tax or business license tax, you know, a big, big, big concern. And suffice it to say that the city had enough financial strength to not dip into its emergency reserves or its budget stabilization funds. So that's a good, good sign. And you can see that in the buildup. In 2017, the city council had $6.9 million in the 5% and 10% reserve, along with unassigned cash. And we've built that to $10.8 million in 2023. That's a significant trend to the positive. That $7.7 million, you know, is in addition to the 5 and 10%. I want to make that clear. And it's unassigned cash that you can use in whatever way you see fit in the general fund. |
01:27:52.14 | Unknown | You also worked on infrastructure by expanding measure O to measure L and creating an additional quarter cent on top of it to create eight years of revenue for infrastructure. And when you do the math on that, that arithmetic is about $24 million over the eight-year life to address infrastructure. You know, we've rebuilt the whole finance department, and one of the things that the council, you know, |
01:28:17.72 | Unknown | asks us to do, and we've completed it, is hire a new independent auditor, and that's Bedowian Associates. You have taken real care of your 115 trust in terms of a plan that you developed before 2020. You had targets and goals. Last year, you put a million dollars into it. So at this time, you have about 5.9 million, 5.7 million dollars in your pension trust fund in combination with their other post-employment benefit fund. So that's good. In addition, through the direction of the council and the work of Finance Director Hess, you know, we've taken idle cash, invested it more aggressively and more safely to get a higher yield, renegotiated our arrangement with the Bank of Marin. And so this year, you'll see our investment and our interest income rise from about $560,000 in 2020 to about $1.560. |
01:29:11.48 | Unknown | $1 million this year. Next slide, please. |
01:29:16.85 | Unknown | So all that's the good news. But, you know, this year has been a bit of a challenge. I think it's been made clear over the last eight months that we've faced an insurance concern that we've been working around the clock to try to address. In addition to the insurance concern, there's been rising pension costs as a result of bad markets. And because the economy hasn't been as strong as it was during the COVID bounce back, our sales tax projections are down. So what that means is you're at a crossroads of taking a budget and looking at it and saying, if we want to maintain service levels, which I've recommended that you use unassigned cash. In order to use unassigned cash, you have to know what's in your amount there. And that's the $7.7 million that I referenced earlier. |
01:30:06.93 | Unknown | You also need to look at your reserve policy. There's been this practice in Sausalito where you have a formal policy of 5% and 10%. And I've been told that, you know, anything above that, you know, try to get to 25%. And then anything above that, try to get to using that money to put in the pension trust or into one-time projects or one-time expenses. So, you know, that's got to be done. And that's what's scheduled for June 25th as the first item on your agenda, because tonight we're going to ask you to use your unassigned cash reserves to balance your budget and maintain service levels. One of the other things that's important is if the city council does not want to do that and you want to live within your means and make up that two- million dollar gap, then, you know, either you have to spend less or cut. And so in that scenario, I asked all of our departments to look at a 10% savings scenario. So in your packet, you have that as well. |
01:31:08.36 | Unknown | Earlier I talked about bifurcating that $2 to $3 to $4 million at the time. We didn't know. Deficit with the use of 115 trust funds, I received direction to stick with the plan that we had to continue building that for the spiking years of 26, 27, and 28. But I was also given direction to look at the administration of our trust fund by PARS. So we will do that. |
01:31:36.71 | Unknown | So all that is to say we're here tonight, but there has to be work done in the future that's based on tonight and what we have talked about in prior years. And one of the key things is to have a |
01:31:50.83 | Unknown | strategy session as early as possible in January as we get our mid-year review, complete our audit, so the city council can start to give us the priorities and the things that they believe are important so we can start to build next year's budgets and the budgets after that. |
01:32:06.91 | Unknown | And because we have the insurance challenge in front of us, you know, we have a lot of work to do in terms of lowering our risk profile. We have requirements that we're going to talk about tonight to enter into a pool that is going to give us the best rate we could get at this time. We're going to have to do a March report to them that shows what we've done to manage our risk, to lower our risk, to not be a risk to the pool. So every month we're going to have to do a risk assessment and build that toward a six month presentation that's going to be required by our new pool. |
01:32:42.55 | Unknown | And, you know, I think that's a healthy approach and a necessary approach, and we'll relish the opportunity to do that. This idea of building a finance tool that would integrate our infrastructure needs and our service costs, as well as our insurance costs in the future, that's a work in progress. It needs to be given some priority. and obviously the involvement of the mayor, Councilmember Hoffman, and former Mayor Withey and our finance director and the city manager is critical to making that part of it. priority and you know obviously the involvement of the mayor Councilmember Hoffman and former mayor withy and our finance director and the city manager is critical to making that part of our budget conversations in the future we were told that our grant |
01:33:20.54 | Unknown | Receipts are not where the council would like them to be. So we did some analysis of it. And I don't disagree with that. We have had a low success rate. We've applied for 23 grants in two years. We've asked for $21 million in change in other people's funds. And we just have not had a success that we want to add to things like infrastructure and climate change and resiliency and all the things that are important to our community. |
01:33:48.37 | Unknown | The other thing that I think is important is whenever you see a deficit, and it may be something that's a future trend, you want to be mindful that it's not the city manager's problem, it's not the city council's problem, it's not the finance director's problem, it's our problem as an organization. And so asking our organizations to involve themselves in an exercise that's mandated, that by the end of the month, each department meet, look at ways to, you know, build ideas that would create revenue or create efficiency or save money. That's an ongoing exercise that we started. We anticipate being done with that in... |
01:34:27.94 | Unknown | into June, formulating our review of it in July, and having that be part of ongoing budget discussions in the future. Because anytime you get to a situation where your revenues don't match up with your expenses, something is amiss. It could be short term, could be long term. But we need to really look at it as something that we can, as an organization, start to bring the creativity and the knowledge of 79 city employees into this process. Next question. |
01:34:56.63 | Unknown | Next slide, please. |
01:34:58.03 | Unknown | Yep. |
01:34:59.31 | Unknown | So that concludes my comments. Chad's going to run through the presentation of more of the financial end of it. That was just to kind of set the table for what he's going to tell you. And, you know, appreciate the community's attention to this, because without this attention and this rigor, you know, we will not do as good a job as we can in preparing a budget that you can adopt next Tuesday. So the plan is to have the deep conversation tonight. |
01:35:26.24 | Unknown | to answer your questions tonight. We come to you on the 25th of this month, next Tuesday, talk about our reserve policy, provide you information on what we recommend. Listen to your feedback on that. |
01:35:40.52 | Unknown | and then adopt the budget and all the related budget documents that go with it, spending limits, the position control sheet, et cetera, |
01:35:48.45 | Unknown | But also, at that time, we would need to develop agreements with our new insurance carrier and adopt those as well. So tonight's a big, big meeting, an important meeting to talk about what our financial picture is and what it looks to be and what it's been. So with that, I turn it over to Chad. |
01:36:05.54 | Unknown | All right. Good evening, Mayor, Council, members of the public. Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the fiscal year 2025 budget with you. |
01:36:14.52 | Unknown | To begin, I just want to review a quick terms sheet, just to make sure that we're all talking the same language as we move forward. |
01:36:22.08 | Unknown | This was presented at a previous budget |
01:36:25.34 | Unknown | session as well. |
01:36:26.50 | Unknown | So again, a budget surplus when receipts |
01:36:29.30 | Unknown | exceed disbursements in a fiscal year or an accounting period, we have a surplus. |
01:36:34.79 | Unknown | A budget deficit is an excess of disbursement over receipt. |
01:36:38.53 | Unknown | in an accounting period or a fiscal year. |
01:36:40.69 | Unknown | And that's when the government spends more on goods and services than it collects in revenue. |
01:36:45.88 | Unknown | Now, fund balance, as Chris has talked about earlier, is the accumulation of |
01:36:50.31 | Unknown | of prior year surpluses. So this is the accumulation of resources over |
01:36:55.61 | Unknown | the government's history. |
01:36:57.53 | Unknown | Now these resources in fund balance are available to be expended. |
01:37:02.41 | Unknown | But now there is a portion, again, the reserves, and that's the portion of the fund balance that are set aside for true emergencies. |
01:37:09.62 | Unknown | These resources are really only to be spent after all other resources are consumed. So it's really that last dollar that we tap into. |
01:37:18.32 | Unknown | Now, also, I'm going to try to use the term resources available in excess of reserves. |
01:37:24.16 | Unknown | And this really references that gap term called unassigned fund balance. And this is really the resources that, |
01:37:31.76 | Unknown | that are available to the government above and beyond the 5% and 10% |
01:37:37.44 | Unknown | reserves. |
01:37:39.71 | Unknown | Now, a quick demonstration in terms of a graph. So fiscal year one, we had a surplus of a |
01:37:46.61 | Unknown | of a half a million dollars. |
01:37:48.55 | Unknown | And you can see that that blue line, the fund balance represents that surplus for that year. |
01:37:54.19 | Unknown | move into fiscal year two, where we had a $200,000 deficit, |
01:37:58.28 | Unknown | And you can see on that screen that did consume |
01:38:01.91 | Unknown | some of our prior year surplus and our fund balance is now at 300,000. |
01:38:06.79 | Unknown | Fiscal year three, really bad year. We lost 400,000 and now that brought us into deficit territory. This is debt spending. We have gone below. |
01:38:16.24 | Unknown | zero in terms of fund balance. We're using other people's money at this point. |
01:38:20.36 | Unknown | We are not here. We have available resources or surplus resources. |
01:38:25.52 | Unknown | Fiscal year three, we had another positive $200,000 |
01:38:29.06 | Unknown | increase in resources that brought our fund balance back above zero. |
01:38:34.30 | Unknown | So just wanted to set that terms and kind of have a basis for our discussion. |
01:38:40.24 | Unknown | Now, |
01:38:40.73 | Unknown | A mistake was made. |
01:38:42.52 | Unknown | I own this air. |
01:38:44.45 | Unknown | And I acknowledge that I made a mistake and there is, |
01:38:48.39 | Unknown | I'm learning that had taken place, and I own that. |
01:38:52.34 | Unknown | So yesterday, as I was working through my insurance budget to answer a question, |
01:38:58.97 | Unknown | I noticed that I inadvertently doubled up my SIR, SIR stands for self insurance reserve, |
01:39:06.36 | Unknown | set aside. So the dollars that we will set aside to pay claims that are under |
01:39:12.05 | Unknown | the insurer's SIR. |
01:39:14.46 | Unknown | Now, |
01:39:15.40 | Unknown | I doubled this up essentially instead of setting aside 750,000, |
01:39:20.42 | Unknown | I doubled it and set aside 1.5 million. |
01:39:24.40 | Unknown | That was leading into our $2 million deficit in the general fund. |
01:39:29.06 | Unknown | So, |
01:39:29.78 | Unknown | I apologize to the community, to council for making this error. |
01:39:33.76 | Unknown | I, |
01:39:35.05 | Unknown | certainly didn't mean to cause this panic of a $2 million deficit. We still are in deficit spending. |
01:39:41.15 | Unknown | but it has been reduced by 750,000. So again, |
01:39:45.91 | Unknown | Any |
01:39:47.11 | Unknown | Changes that I've made to this slide are noted in red font, just in complete transparency. |
01:39:53.39 | Unknown | This updated slide deck was requested to be updated. |
01:39:56.36 | Unknown | for members of the public and council. |
01:39:58.42 | Unknown | So, |
01:39:58.98 | Unknown | With that, I will move on. |
01:40:02.50 | Unknown | So we're gonna start with the general fund and here is the slide that was originally presented. I'm gonna go ahead and just move forward to the next slide. |
01:40:08.71 | Councilman Hoffman | the next slide. Yeah, pull on to clarify. Yes. If you have questions, we're just gonna let him get through his presentation. |
01:40:10.15 | Unknown | Yes. |
01:40:10.74 | Unknown | Clarify. |
01:40:10.97 | Unknown | Yep. |
01:40:15.16 | Unknown | That was my thought is just to manage time. So, okay. You go through your whole presentation and then we'll ask you questions. |
01:40:16.63 | Councilman Hoffman | I agree. |
01:40:22.30 | Unknown | All right, so OPEB and pension liabilities is one of our challenges, as we've discussed in the past. |
01:40:28.30 | Unknown | This hasn't changed. We are still in |
01:40:33.28 | Unknown | facing an increase. |
01:40:34.80 | Unknown | citywide of $470,000 for UAL payments |
01:40:39.39 | Unknown | And our OPEP direct payments for retirees will be $300,000 in fiscal year 25. |
01:40:44.88 | Unknown | under the insurance |
01:40:46.28 | Unknown | We have new information that has become available just today. |
01:40:50.51 | Unknown | and that we're going to have to talk about this evening. |
01:40:53.18 | Unknown | We are still planning to participate in PRISM GL1 with a $500,000 SIR. |
01:41:00.84 | Unknown | Um, |
01:41:01.50 | Unknown | We have been officially |
01:41:04.53 | Unknown | granted access to join Prism. |
01:41:07.22 | Unknown | under this GL1 program. So we are able to take advantage of this pool |
01:41:12.80 | Unknown | And that takes our worst case scenario really off the table by using private |
01:41:18.42 | Unknown | insurance carriers. |
01:41:20.45 | Unknown | I'm not sure. |
01:41:21.31 | Unknown | Our insurance, we were looking originally at using the state plan because we did not have pricing from PRISM at that time. |
01:41:27.70 | Unknown | And that was first dollar coverage. |
01:41:30.17 | Unknown | Prism has since come back to us with some additional information. |
01:41:33.78 | Unknown | And that is going to be a discussion point that we need to have this evening. |
01:41:38.47 | Unknown | PRISM has come back to us with property insurance. |
01:41:41.32 | Unknown | which is a very favorable quote. |
01:41:43.84 | Unknown | much lower than we received from Hub |
01:41:46.55 | Unknown | and we will show you that on a future slide. |
01:41:49.07 | Unknown | That is still an increase in what we've paid in the past, but it is much, much lower than what we were facing today. |
01:41:55.04 | Unknown | So, I think that's a good question. |
01:41:56.26 | Unknown | in the private market. |
01:41:58.45 | Unknown | So the impact on the general fund for increased insurance costs is $687,000. |
01:42:03.63 | Unknown | for fiscal year 25. |
01:42:05.81 | Unknown | For the entire enterprise citywide, that increase in insurance costs is just under $1,983,000. |
01:42:12.69 | Unknown | over what we paid with base settings. |
01:42:15.32 | Unknown | And again, no surprise, we had a softening of sales tax and then also a reduction due to |
01:42:20.93 | Unknown | one of our significant sales tax contributors we've talked about in the past. |
01:42:25.89 | Unknown | Now, I did add a new slide here. |
01:42:28.79 | Unknown | This is going to come up as we start talking about insurance. |
01:42:31.69 | Unknown | This is California labor code section. |
01:42:34.26 | Unknown | 4850. |
01:42:35.86 | Unknown | And this pertains to |
01:42:38.14 | Unknown | individuals who work in |
01:42:40.47 | Unknown | Police, fire, really that public safety space. |
01:42:44.44 | Unknown | um, |
01:42:45.16 | Unknown | Anybody who is injured in the course of their general duties, |
01:42:49.23 | Unknown | is entitled to |
01:42:51.54 | Unknown | salary in lieu of temporary disability payment. |
01:42:55.61 | Unknown | So really the city is responsible to pay their full salary. |
01:42:59.59 | Unknown | for at least |
01:43:01.49 | Unknown | the time that they're disabled, |
01:43:03.00 | Unknown | but not to exceed |
01:43:04.38 | Unknown | one year. |
01:43:05.70 | Unknown | Um, |
01:43:06.24 | Unknown | This will become important as we discuss workman's comp and the options that we have available to us. |
01:43:13.36 | Unknown | All right, so here's a slide that I've reworked. |
01:43:15.82 | Unknown | Originally, we had planned to use |
01:43:18.69 | Unknown | um, prisms, general liability. |
01:43:21.39 | Unknown | We also plan to use hubs, workman's comp, this is the state plan. |
01:43:26.81 | Unknown | And then the property premium was $418,000. |
01:43:30.13 | Unknown | simply because we did not have |
01:43:32.48 | Unknown | any indication from PRISM. |
01:43:34.65 | Unknown | So I'm going to move forward to the next slide and this will give you an update |
01:43:38.18 | Unknown | Um, |
01:43:38.84 | Unknown | basically as of today. |
01:43:41.89 | Unknown | What we have here is HUBZ Premium is still at $1.2 million for a $500,000 SIR. |
01:43:48.54 | Unknown | $25 million limit. |
01:43:50.62 | Unknown | And there's no aggregate claim limit. |
01:43:53.03 | Unknown | This is much better coverage. |
01:43:55.18 | Unknown | than what we would see under the hub plan. |
01:43:58.90 | Unknown | Workman's Comp Hub Prism, I'm sorry, has come back to us and has offered us |
01:44:03.71 | Unknown | coverage. |
01:44:04.98 | Unknown | with a $350,000 SIR |
01:44:09.52 | Unknown | for premium coverage of 130,000. |
01:44:12.15 | Unknown | and an additional $35,000 for |
01:44:15.29 | Unknown | 4850 coverage. This is the coverage for those individuals working in our police departments. |
01:44:20.93 | Unknown | those payments can be very significant. It is truly their full wage and benefits. |
01:44:26.44 | Unknown | or up to a year. |
01:44:27.91 | Unknown | in the event of a disability. |
01:44:30.17 | Unknown | Um, |
01:44:31.32 | Unknown | We did get some additional pricing from the state fund plan. You can see here that |
01:44:36.32 | Unknown | Their pricing has come down a little bit, but under this plan it does not offer |
01:44:41.43 | Unknown | 4850 coverage, the city would be responsible to |
01:44:45.36 | Unknown | pay those expenses out of pocket. |
01:44:47.59 | Unknown | in the event of |
01:44:49.55 | Unknown | public safety injury. |
01:44:51.37 | Unknown | We would also have to include insurance from the private market, |
01:44:56.41 | Unknown | for |
01:44:57.11 | Unknown | POL and EPL coverage as |
01:44:59.62 | Unknown | employment practice. |
01:45:01.70 | Unknown | coverages. |
01:45:03.35 | Unknown | So this is a new slide and we're gonna see this come together here on the next slide. |
01:45:08.07 | Unknown | to show us our options. |
01:45:10.44 | Unknown | So on this slide here, you can see my original budget, and this is where I made my mistake. |
01:45:15.50 | Unknown | So right here, you can see, this is what I had for |
01:45:18.82 | Unknown | the PRISM general liability. This number is a combination of |
01:45:23.65 | Unknown | their premium. |
01:45:25.30 | Unknown | plus the set-aside |
01:45:27.24 | Unknown | or |
01:45:28.26 | Unknown | paying those claims. |
01:45:29.89 | Unknown | I inadvertently included that in this line item for prism. |
01:45:34.38 | Unknown | And it was also here, which did result in our |
01:45:37.67 | Unknown | significant general fund deficit of $2,052,000. |
01:45:42.82 | Unknown | What I had intended to do, you will see here in this third or the second column, |
01:45:47.65 | Unknown | This is what I should have done. |
01:45:49.52 | Unknown | I should have had 1,045,000 for... |
01:45:53.40 | Unknown | PRISM coverage. |
01:45:54.92 | Unknown | um, |
01:45:55.65 | Unknown | our 450 for Hobb, |
01:45:57.84 | Unknown | And then just a single $750,000 SIR set aside. |
01:46:01.97 | Unknown | So our true general fund deficit should have been |
01:46:05.48 | Unknown | 1.3 million when we started this discussion. And for that, I apologize. |
01:46:11.02 | Unknown | Now, today we have received more information, and we did discuss that real briefly on |
01:46:16.64 | Unknown | The next slide. |
01:46:18.34 | Unknown | We did get original indication from PRISM for PRISM property. |
01:46:22.75 | Unknown | as well as Workman's Comp, |
01:46:24.72 | Unknown | I'm going to advance to the next slide here. |
01:46:27.52 | Unknown | because we now have even more information that came available at 5.30 this evening. |
01:46:32.77 | Unknown | City Manager Zapata has mentioned. |
01:46:35.62 | Unknown | We have really been working on this. |
01:46:37.66 | Unknown | nonstop trying to bring this together. |
01:46:40.38 | Unknown | So here's what we have as far as options on the table. And this is one of really our decisions. |
01:46:46.51 | Unknown | that will need to be made. |
01:46:48.48 | Unknown | Um, |
01:46:49.04 | Unknown | The primary difference is |
01:46:50.98 | Unknown | between |
01:46:52.19 | Unknown | this column here, this third column. |
01:46:54.69 | Unknown | in the fourth column. |
01:46:56.26 | Unknown | is on this last column, we go with the state plan. So this would be the state workers comp plan, |
01:47:02.06 | Unknown | first dollar coverage. |
01:47:03.60 | Unknown | But again, no coverage for |
01:47:06.49 | Unknown | 4850 in the event of injury for public safety officers. |
01:47:11.62 | Unknown | Um, |
01:47:12.56 | Unknown | On this column here, we would join PRISM's Workman's Comp with a $350,000 self-assured intention. |
01:47:19.38 | Unknown | We would add that additional rider for $35,000 for $48,50. |
01:47:25.27 | Unknown | And then here, because it is a higher SIR, |
01:47:28.48 | Unknown | we would need to set aside some additional dollars to pay those claims. |
01:47:33.77 | Unknown | based on analysis. |
01:47:36.09 | Unknown | the city attorney and I agree that about 250,000 seems appropriate. |
01:47:40.83 | Unknown | based upon some of our prior year's losses. |
01:47:43.51 | Unknown | for that set aside under this plan. |
01:47:46.75 | Unknown | Now, when we look at the total reduction |
01:47:50.04 | Unknown | So, |
01:47:51.20 | Unknown | This is our |
01:47:52.89 | Unknown | reduction from the original budget. |
01:47:54.73 | Unknown | is 980,000. |
01:47:57.38 | Unknown | compared to 1,600,000. |
01:48:00.44 | Unknown | This now brings our deficit because of the improved pricing under Prism property. |
01:48:05.28 | Unknown | and PRISM Workman's Comp. |
01:48:06.95 | Unknown | Our general fund deficit is now down to |
01:48:09.95 | Unknown | 1,072,000. |
01:48:12.20 | Unknown | or 900 |
01:48:13.90 | Unknown | and 90,000 based upon which workman's comp plan we choose to go with. |
01:48:19.27 | Unknown | So that will be a decision point that we will need to make on, |
01:48:22.88 | Unknown | which plan we go to and what is our risk appetite. |
01:48:26.12 | Unknown | Um, |
01:48:26.73 | Unknown | for potential losses under the 4850 coverage. |
01:48:32.11 | Unknown | Now, moving on to revenues in the general fund, this slide has not changed, we have seen this before. |
01:48:37.54 | Unknown | Again, our significant changes are the reduction in sales tax, again, due to reallocation of a major contributor. |
01:48:44.72 | Unknown | as well as a softening economy based upon our HDL's recommendation. |
01:48:50.15 | Unknown | Also, we do have a reduction here for intergovernmental revenue. Again, these are grants that we receive from the state government, the federal government, |
01:48:57.69 | Unknown | A lot of this revenue is kind of unpredictable. |
01:49:01.83 | Unknown | Last year, we were very fortunate and received a couple of |
01:49:05.30 | Unknown | unbudgeted grants that were recognized in the mid-year budget review. |
01:49:09.91 | Unknown | Um, |
01:49:10.35 | Unknown | And this year, we do not anticipate anything or we are not aware of any grants that are available or state dollars. |
01:49:16.17 | Unknown | available. |
01:49:17.45 | Unknown | Overall, we're projecting about a 4% decrease in revenues. |
01:49:21.55 | Unknown | or fiscal year 25. |
01:49:24.81 | Unknown | Moving forward, here is our original slide. |
01:49:27.76 | Unknown | This slide is assuming the |
01:49:31.17 | Unknown | the error that I made, |
01:49:32.45 | Unknown | and then also has old information from our insurance providers. |
01:49:37.15 | Unknown | So I've replaced this slide with our new slide here, which does reflect |
01:49:42.34 | Unknown | a lower cost. Here we were on the assumption that we would take the state's plan |
01:49:48.76 | Unknown | when these slides were prepared. |
01:49:51.14 | Unknown | I think there should be some discussion about maybe taking the prison plan and we can discuss that during. |
01:49:56.67 | Unknown | a little bit later in the slide deck or this presentation. |
01:50:00.23 | Unknown | So we have updated where the insurance was coded. You can see here this red item or this red number has changed. |
01:50:06.37 | Unknown | And one thing I do want to call everybody's attention to |
01:50:09.61 | Unknown | is a change in salary, just to be transparent, |
01:50:13.09 | Unknown | And you can see that down here in red, the methodology that is used for salaries and benefits has changed. |
01:50:19.82 | Unknown | So when looking at the salaries and benefits for 24 and 25, |
01:50:24.77 | Unknown | They are not apple to apple. |
01:50:27.08 | Unknown | In fiscal year 24, we budgeted using |
01:50:30.89 | Unknown | full employment and top step |
01:50:33.61 | Unknown | for all positions. |
01:50:35.11 | Unknown | This number did overstate our salaries and benefits. |
01:50:39.75 | Unknown | because we were |
01:50:41.39 | Unknown | budgeting very high on the spectrum. |
01:50:43.85 | Unknown | Um, |
01:50:44.53 | Unknown | of those of those wage allocations for all of our positions. |
01:50:48.36 | Unknown | making the change in fiscal year 25, |
01:50:51.26 | Unknown | I have continued to budget for full employment because our goal is to fill all of our positions. |
01:50:58.06 | Unknown | do fill all of our open positions and really provide great service to our community. |
01:51:02.47 | Unknown | but I have changed where I budget |
01:51:05.03 | Unknown | their wages. |
01:51:06.25 | Unknown | I budget their wages at a more realistic based upon where they are currently at. |
01:51:11.17 | Unknown | position by position and then factor in their steps and their colas. |
01:51:15.38 | Unknown | So I'm becoming more precise in that budget. |
01:51:18.58 | Unknown | reflecting of salaries and benefits. So it's becoming more |
01:51:22.82 | Unknown | a more realistic reflection of the cost |
01:51:25.25 | Unknown | and helps us to make better decisions. |
01:51:28.00 | Unknown | If we had an apples to apples comparison, |
01:51:30.77 | Unknown | the actual change in salaries is closer to 1.1 million. |
01:51:34.65 | Unknown | that I'm simply assuming or consuming |
01:51:37.70 | Unknown | some of my budgetary slack was inherently built into fiscal year 24. |
01:51:42.22 | Unknown | So again, we are trying to just improve our budgeting process. But again, in full transparency, I wanted to disclose that. |
01:51:49.30 | Unknown | Our next slide here is the slide that, |
01:51:52.99 | Unknown | Marisol Biaske. |
01:51:54.37 | Unknown | had asked that I include or have available. |
01:51:57.50 | Unknown | This here is the Sausalito turnover rate. |
01:52:01.53 | Unknown | And I am going to pause real quick and let HR manager Kathy Nikitas have just a real quick comment. |
01:52:08.73 | Unknown | on this slide. |
01:52:12.16 | Kathy Nikitas | Hi. |
01:52:12.75 | Kathy Nikitas | Thank you, Chad. I'm Kathy Nikitas. I'm the human resources manager. |
01:52:17.68 | Kathy Nikitas | And that site is just really just a simple way of showing that we're getting better at holding on to our people. |
01:52:23.99 | Kathy Nikitas | And that is a value that is beyond dollars. But if we look at the dollars, |
01:52:30.82 | Kathy Nikitas | we can estimate an average cost of recruitments. And that involves advertising, that involves staff hours. Sometimes that involves consultant hours as well, because we're still getting a little bit of help in that area. So for the most simple position, |
01:52:39.23 | Unknown | And so. |
01:52:51.97 | Kathy Nikitas | Thank you. |
01:52:52.36 | Kathy Nikitas | it could cost $1,000. For a department head-level position, it could cost up to $10,000. So we just cited an average of $4,500 to about $6,000 for the average recruitment. |
01:53:08.73 | Kathy Nikitas | We looked at the period of August 2021 to July 2022, and we had about 21 full-time employees leave at that point during that period. I went just with full-time employees because that's what we absolutely need to keep going, and I felt like it was too much apples and oranges to be looking at part-time employees versus full-time employee recruitments. |
01:53:36.91 | Kathy Nikitas | So that represents roughly a 35% turnover rate. |
01:53:43.23 | Kathy Nikitas | Ideally, we could look at having a 10% turnover rate, but that might not be realistic. And so I would be happy if we saw 15% sustained for a couple of years at least. So 35%, that was pretty hefty when you look at our full-time employees. The following 12-month period, we were down to about 14 full-time employees leaving. So that became about 20%. |
01:54:11.62 | Kathy Nikitas | For the last, it's about a 10-month period, we're at 14.9%. And I will say that out of that, two of those people leaving, and we're talking about 10 employees, two of those were people who have actually been gone for almost a year at that point, but I felt it was fair to include them in the numbers because we want to be accurate and transparent. |
01:54:35.85 | Kathy Nikitas | That also includes one person who left and came back within a week and a half because the grass isn't always greener on the other side. So while there were 10 people who have left, really, again, two of those people would have been pushed to the prior year as far as when they started not working with us. And one of those people came right back, so it made our recruitment costs certainly lower in that situation. So we're going in the right direction, and all of the things that we've been doing that the city manager has spoken about and that Director Hess has been speaking about, |
01:55:16.98 | Kathy Nikitas | are helping hold on to employees. There's always going to be turnover. People retire. People move across the country. We had one person do that in this group of 10. So that's always going to happen. You can't look for zero turnover because things happen in life. But we want to just keep it to a minimum and control all the things that we can control about the things that minimize that. |
01:55:49.22 | Unknown | Thank you, Kathy. |
01:55:50.29 | Kathy Nikitas | Thanks, Chad. |
01:55:51.23 | Kathy Nikitas | Thank you. |
01:55:52.26 | Unknown | All right. |
01:55:53.21 | Unknown | Moving on. |
01:55:54.19 | Unknown | So on this slide here, this was our original budget. And again, this included |
01:55:59.62 | Unknown | inaccurate information for our SIR set aside |
01:56:03.41 | Unknown | And then this had old assumptions for insurance. Again, our pricing just came in. |
01:56:09.05 | Unknown | just the other day. |
01:56:11.16 | Unknown | Here I have updated our general fund expenses. This is by department. |
01:56:15.90 | Unknown | A couple of things that I want to point out here, this non-departmental, this is where we house our insurance costs. They are not allocated out to departments at this point in time. |
01:56:26.20 | Unknown | So our experience is baked into here. |
01:56:29.08 | Unknown | That updated our number and has greatly lowered our general fund expenses. |
01:56:35.36 | Unknown | A couple of the significant changes that I want to talk about finance department is seeing an increase, this is due to. |
01:56:42.94 | Unknown | the risk manager position, his or her, whoever we hire, |
01:56:47.59 | Unknown | I'm sorry, their benefits and wages and benefits will be under the finance department. So that is one change. |
01:56:53.97 | Unknown | That is significant. |
01:56:55.78 | Unknown | Engineering is seeing a slight change. This is really due to a full year of employment for the new project managers |
01:57:04.52 | Unknown | over the prior year budget. |
01:57:07.19 | Unknown | Um, |
01:57:08.15 | Unknown | In the planning and zoning department, we are seeing a drop in professional services, which is helping the budget. |
01:57:15.76 | Unknown | So that is a reduction in planning and zoning of about 14%, 15%, 200,000. |
01:57:22.41 | Unknown | Economic development, this is kind of a new department that we're showing here. This included the CDA contract. |
01:57:29.68 | Unknown | Destination Sausalito |
01:57:32.11 | Unknown | and the lights. The CDA contract has been removed from that |
01:57:36.94 | Unknown | So you can see here that is a reduction in our general fund budget. |
01:57:41.58 | Unknown | Public Works has seen an increase, mainly due to costs of supplies. That's really driving |
01:57:48.09 | Unknown | Supplies and utilities are driving up the public works budget. |
01:57:51.70 | Unknown | fairly significantly due to electric rates, water rates, |
01:57:56.85 | Unknown | And then just general supplies and materials in general. |
01:58:00.85 | Unknown | All right, on the next slide here, |
01:58:02.89 | Unknown | Again, here, this is an attempt to reconcile |
01:58:06.99 | Unknown | that total change from fiscal year to fiscal year, |
01:58:10.82 | Unknown | Um, |
01:58:11.61 | Unknown | So if we look at the total change, and let me go up a couple of slides here, |
01:58:16.36 | Unknown | and I think that's a good question. |
01:58:17.22 | Unknown | Right here, here's this number, this 1.5 million. |
01:58:21.00 | Unknown | that's looking at total change from fiscal year 24, which is a surplus, |
01:58:27.32 | Unknown | to fiscal year 25, which is now a projected deficit. |
01:58:30.85 | Unknown | We have a swing of about 1.5 million. |
01:58:34.84 | Unknown | On this slide here is where I |
01:58:38.46 | Unknown | try to justify or do an analysis on what are the driving factors in that |
01:58:43.07 | Unknown | that move. |
01:58:44.50 | Unknown | So again, here you can see that total change of 1.5 million. |
01:58:48.18 | Unknown | um, |
01:58:48.82 | Unknown | Really, the decrease in property tax or decrease in sales taxes of about half a million dollars |
01:58:55.17 | Unknown | 36% of that. |
01:58:57.06 | Unknown | and we're going to have a |
01:58:57.77 | Unknown | the decrease in intergovernmental revenue, |
01:58:59.91 | Unknown | 160,000 of identified grants. This was the |
01:59:04.15 | Unknown | state grant that we received for the housing element study costs. |
01:59:08.60 | Unknown | increase in UAL to the general fund, and then increase in insurance costs allocated to the general fund. |
01:59:13.87 | Unknown | The insurance cost alone is 43%. |
01:59:17.97 | Unknown | Um, |
01:59:18.85 | Unknown | of that of that thing. And if you add these up, they do exceed 100% if you add up all my percentages. |
01:59:24.92 | Unknown | Again, because I've identified more items. |
01:59:27.69 | Unknown | Um, |
01:59:28.30 | Unknown | that explain the game than the things. |
01:59:31.37 | Unknown | All right, here is general fund, fund balances over a period of time. |
01:59:36.28 | Unknown | So again, this is referencing what Chris mentioned. |
01:59:39.62 | Unknown | City Manager Kepada in the earlier presentation. |
01:59:42.81 | Unknown | We have been slowly building up fund balances. So you can see that reserves and unassigned fund balance. |
01:59:43.13 | Katie Thau Garcia | We have |
01:59:49.42 | Unknown | has slowly grown over the course of several years. |
01:59:53.29 | Unknown | as well as our total fund balance. So we've got $10.8 million |
01:59:57.27 | Unknown | as of fiscal year 23, |
01:59:59.63 | Unknown | audited numbers. |
02:00:01.56 | Unknown | And then total fund balance of $15 million in the general fund. |
02:00:05.62 | Unknown | And that will play into my next slide here. |
02:00:08.29 | Unknown | Again, this slide has been updated. |
02:00:11.02 | Unknown | Our worst case is no longer relevant. |
02:00:14.97 | Unknown | This was assuming that we had to go with Hub and we were not allowed |
02:00:18.82 | Unknown | into prism. |
02:00:20.57 | Unknown | So this is my updated slide. |
02:00:23.51 | Unknown | I have updated that worst case. |
02:00:25.97 | Unknown | And this is assuming that we have a really bad year |
02:00:29.01 | Unknown | So I've added additional dollars in terms of, |
02:00:33.06 | Unknown | SIR assuming some claims. |
02:00:37.35 | Unknown | If we look here, this is fiscal year 23. This is our starting point. These are audited numbers. |
02:00:43.76 | Unknown | Here you can see that we have a 15% reserve |
02:00:47.40 | Unknown | I'm not sure. |
02:00:48.15 | Unknown | the 10%, the 5%. |
02:00:50.44 | Unknown | We are projecting or recommending that we |
02:00:54.26 | Unknown | I think that's a good question. |
02:00:55.32 | Unknown | increase that. |
02:00:56.42 | Unknown | reserve. |
02:00:57.75 | Unknown | to 25% and we're gonna bring that as a formal action |
02:01:01.66 | Unknown | to counsel at the next meeting. |
02:01:04.03 | Unknown | So if we look here again, these two lower red or two, I'm sorry, two lower blue bars or buckets. |
02:01:11.67 | Unknown | This is our reserve. |
02:01:12.80 | Unknown | This represents roughly $5 million or 25% of our general fund |
02:01:18.19 | Unknown | spend. |
02:01:19.99 | Unknown | general fund expenses roughly around $20 million. |
02:01:23.38 | Unknown | Above that, we have our non-spendables. |
02:01:25.95 | Unknown | And then we have our section 115, or I'm sorry, pension assets. |
02:01:31.30 | Unknown | That represents about |
02:01:32.93 | Unknown | Uh, |
02:01:33.74 | Unknown | $3.7 million. |
02:01:36.19 | Unknown | And then this really bright blue bar, that is going to be our resources in excess. |
02:01:41.96 | Unknown | of our reserves. So those are really available for |
02:01:45.25 | Unknown | Um, |
02:01:46.27 | Unknown | the city's needs. And in this insurance predicament is certainly one of those needs. |
02:01:50.97 | Unknown | So here you can see if we look at our fiscal year 24, |
02:01:54.72 | Unknown | Um, |
02:01:55.24 | Unknown | This is considering our half a million dollar surplus that we are projecting. |
02:01:59.58 | Unknown | In fiscal year 24, you can see here that we've got |
02:02:03.07 | Unknown | Um, |
02:02:03.95 | Unknown | you know, an inquiry. |
02:02:05.06 | Unknown | in, in, |
02:02:05.94 | Unknown | in |
02:02:06.60 | Unknown | reserve. |
02:02:07.60 | Unknown | And then here we are consuming |
02:02:09.87 | Unknown | some of those reserves if we look at our best case because of that unbalanced general fund. |
02:02:14.43 | Unknown | with a deficit just around a million dollars. |
02:02:17.45 | Unknown | Here would be maybe a work case if we had maybe a half a million dollars more in claims |
02:02:23.51 | Unknown | than what was in our budget. |
02:02:25.53 | Unknown | So this, again, we are consuming some of those |
02:02:28.72 | Unknown | resources available in excess of reserves. |
02:02:31.64 | Unknown | but we would not be getting anywhere near our reserves. |
02:02:36.59 | Unknown | Um, |
02:02:37.68 | Unknown | You can see reconciliation of all city funds |
02:02:41.90 | Unknown | Um, |
02:02:42.69 | Unknown | I removed this slide and updated it. |
02:02:45.19 | Unknown | Here you can see that updated insurance |
02:02:48.60 | Unknown | or the updated general fund expenses. |
02:02:50.96 | Unknown | This has been reduced because of the reduction in planned insurance costs |
02:02:55.39 | Unknown | which has reduced our savings and fund balance again to just under a million. |
02:03:00.24 | Unknown | I'm not sure. |
02:03:00.90 | Unknown | because I have... |
02:03:02.02 | Unknown | over-doubled up my |
02:03:04.75 | Unknown | my revenues and my general liability. |
02:03:07.27 | Unknown | So, |
02:03:08.12 | Unknown | Self-increase. |
02:03:08.97 | Unknown | fund. |
02:03:10.02 | Unknown | This number here has been reduced by 750,000 because of my error. |
02:03:14.74 | Unknown | that I disclosed earlier in the presentation. |
02:03:18.47 | Unknown | Moving forward here, you can see a mix of other infrastructure and operations. This has not changed from |
02:03:24.63 | Unknown | previous slides or previous presentations, this bill is reflective in the budget book. |
02:03:29.39 | Unknown | that was available before |
02:03:31.28 | Unknown | the meeting. |
02:03:33.57 | Unknown | The final slide here, this simply changed because I needed to update the totals and I apologize that this did not |
02:03:40.85 | Unknown | Um, |
02:03:42.15 | Unknown | update or I didn't note in red. |
02:03:44.88 | Unknown | that this number has changed, this total line has changed, |
02:03:48.39 | Unknown | And then the same imbalance sort of thing. |
02:03:51.17 | Unknown | and our |
02:03:52.07 | Unknown | ending balance would have been. |
02:03:53.89 | Unknown | So those three numbers were updated from the previous slide. |
02:03:57.76 | Unknown | I just want to make sure that I call attention to that. |
02:04:00.66 | Unknown | for full disclosure. |
02:04:03.07 | Unknown | The final slide to talk to you here for interest earnings. |
02:04:07.76 | Unknown | This is really reflective of what Chris |
02:04:09.64 | Unknown | made reference to in his remarks. |
02:04:11.80 | Unknown | Here you can see on the illustration of interest earnings |
02:04:15.34 | Unknown | Um, |
02:04:15.71 | Unknown | on the city's idle tax over the previous five years. |
02:04:20.22 | Unknown | fiscal year 24 has seen a much, much better return |
02:04:24.03 | Unknown | simply because we're being more intentional |
02:04:26.41 | Unknown | on how we |
02:04:27.45 | Unknown | invest those idle resources. |
02:04:30.48 | Unknown | And finally, we'll expand a little bit more on the soft legal care plan. |
02:04:34.68 | Unknown | CARE stands for Cost and Revenue Efficiency. |
02:04:38.14 | Unknown | What we are doing is we've met with department heads, as Chris had mentioned, |
02:04:43.01 | Unknown | And we've asked them to |
02:04:45.21 | Unknown | discuss with our team ways that we can |
02:04:47.60 | Unknown | either reduce costs or |
02:04:49.75 | Unknown | generate additional revenues to the city. |
02:04:52.48 | Unknown | Information is due back, as Chris mentioned, by June 30th. |
02:04:56.82 | Unknown | Um, |
02:04:57.66 | Unknown | City Manager Zapata and myself will evaluate the ideas and rank them. |
02:05:01.96 | Unknown | based upon impact and effort. |
02:05:04.16 | Unknown | to identify ways that we can have |
02:05:06.82 | Unknown | really significant impact. |
02:05:08.87 | Unknown | and reduced our efforts to help balance this budget moving forward. |
02:05:12.71 | Unknown | Ideas will be presented to council. |
02:05:16.06 | Unknown | in September after their recess. |
02:05:19.53 | Unknown | With that being said, I'll go ahead and end my slides there and open it up for comments. |
02:05:22.38 | Unknown | it's a great thing. |
02:05:24.86 | Unknown | Okay, we'll open up for comments. I just wanna congratulate you. Sorry, yes, thank you, questions. Congratulations, you and the. |
02:05:32.31 | Unknown | team on the insurance matter in particular, with all this splendid presentation. So I'm sure we have lots of questions. But I also want to just acknowledge the hard work |
02:05:41.48 | Unknown | You and the numerous other people that were involved, Sergio, Chris Seating, the manager, Kathy, many others in, |
02:05:46.70 | Unknown | really pulling a rabbit out of the hat under a tough situation on the insurance so |
02:05:51.31 | Unknown | and my vice mayor, who was on the committee, that we did very little compared to |
02:05:55.10 | Unknown | the hard daily. |
02:05:56.62 | Unknown | daily work of so many people. It was having a front row seat on it. I just got to say to my colleagues, |
02:05:58.72 | Unknown | It was a... |
02:05:59.39 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:06:02.55 | Unknown | you would have been super proud of our staff and the city and to the residents, super proud of our staff. |
02:06:07.49 | Unknown | really hard working on this matter. It was impressive and has been bearing fruit. So anyway, sorry for the comment for the question. Does anyone want to start with some questions? |
02:06:19.03 | Unknown | Council Member Kellman. |
02:06:20.30 | Kellerman | Great. |
02:06:21.02 | Kellerman | Chad, thank you and thank you city manager. I know you guys have been very busy along with the city attorney on the on the insurance work. |
02:06:26.19 | Unknown | on the |
02:06:26.51 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
02:06:28.04 | Kellerman | So I'm going to start there for now. |
02:06:32.41 | Kellerman | Can you just back up a second, Chad, and... |
02:06:35.44 | Kellerman | Explain what the SIR means in practical terms for the city. |
02:06:39.59 | Unknown | Yeah, so the SIR, Self-Inference Reserves, |
02:06:43.74 | Unknown | In terms of a homeowner policy, think of it as your deductible. |
02:06:48.53 | Unknown | Really, that is who is going to pay the first dollar of any incurred law. |
02:06:54.96 | Unknown | So when we're talking about an SIR of 500,000, |
02:06:58.82 | Unknown | That would mean if somebody is walking down and Trips falls on sidewalks, soothes us, |
02:07:04.61 | Unknown | for a million dollars. |
02:07:06.27 | Unknown | we would be responsible for the first 500,000 |
02:07:10.59 | Unknown | of that claim. |
02:07:12.17 | Unknown | If they sue us for $200,000, we would pay the whole claim because that is under the SIR, self-insurance reserve, of our policy. |
02:07:22.33 | Kellerman | Okay, so city attorney, as we know, is here tonight since we've been making them work hard. So I think it's worth understanding. |
02:07:26.65 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:07:32.32 | Kellerman | Our claims to date, right, given our insurance woes, how many of them would come under the recommended SIR such that they would be out of pocket? |
02:07:43.64 | Unknown | So realistically speaking, most of the claims and settlements the city has had |
02:07:50.14 | Unknown | are, |
02:07:50.88 | Unknown | typically under a half million dollars. So I would say that a fair amount of your claims |
02:07:56.65 | Unknown | and the dollars that you would pay are under the self-insured retention. |
02:08:00.57 | Unknown | or would be under the self-insured retention for PRISM. As you folks are likely aware, you know, Bay City's raised the city's self-insured retention to half a million dollars in October of |
02:08:12.36 | Unknown | Last year on the private marketplace, the lowest self-insured retention the city was able to locate was $400,000. And that policy would cap coverage after $3 million. |
02:08:26.69 | Unknown | So, um, |
02:08:28.95 | Unknown | Again, a lot of the city's claims in terms of volume |
02:08:32.99 | Unknown | You know, some of them are as low as five or ten thousand dollars. You know, they may be a |
02:08:38.39 | Unknown | you know, |
02:08:39.35 | Unknown | a small slip and fall or some sort of sewage backup in a home, you know, that results as a result of like cleaning done by public works. You know, these are |
02:08:50.30 | Unknown | tree damage type claims where a tree falls onto private property. So those are small dollar claims. Even under a $50,000 SIR that the city has historically enjoyed, those kinds of claims would be coming out of the city's pocket entirely. |
02:09:06.67 | Kellerman | Okay, so let me just pause for that. Thank you, Sergio. So what I would like to see, and Chad, you and I talked about this over today, so I'm not just bringing this on you. What I would like to see is |
02:09:13.30 | Unknown | Whatever. |
02:09:15.83 | Kellerman | in aggregate, how much if the city adopted plan A, how much would the city have to pay out of pocket? If the city went for the upfront dollar amount, how much do we potentially save? Because if we pay |
02:09:30.43 | Kellerman | And this is a question I want to know if this is an accurate way of looking at it. If we pay for a plan that has a higher deductible, but the average of 23 claims a year that we have been filing causes us to pull money from the general plan, we haven't done ourselves any favors. |
02:09:46.97 | Kellerman | Um, |
02:09:48.30 | Kellerman | But we could, if because it's a cheaper plan, then use those monies for risk mitigation. So I'm trying to understand the trade-offs that you're presenting to us. |
02:10:02.22 | Unknown | So are really two options for general liability |
02:10:06.57 | Unknown | are, are, |
02:10:08.11 | Unknown | Prism with a $500,000 SIR or Hob with 400,000. |
02:10:13.38 | Unknown | The hub is |
02:10:15.38 | Unknown | five, |
02:10:16.11 | Unknown | four or five times as expensive as Prism. |
02:10:18.98 | Kellerman | Can you put slide 13 back up? |
02:10:20.29 | Unknown | Yes, I sure can. |
02:10:21.61 | Kellerman | Right, because you talked about a first dollar. |
02:10:21.63 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:10:21.90 | Unknown | You said- |
02:10:24.07 | Kellerman | Right? |
02:10:24.09 | Unknown | Now that's under the workman's comp. |
02:10:24.92 | Kellerman | I'm sorry. |
02:10:27.11 | Kellerman | Yes. |
02:10:27.15 | Unknown | But yes, let me go back to slide 13. |
02:10:29.14 | Kellerman | So my comment or my question, I'm sorry, Mayor, I don't mean to give a comment, but I'm really trying to figure out, you know, with the breakout of our of the claims to date that that causes to lose our insurance, how much that would have cost us under both of these scenarios. And |
02:10:44.29 | Kellerman | There's different types of there's there's workers comp, there's something falls, there's litigation. We should see those broken out and understanding the cost for each so that we can then weigh which of these plans is better for us. Number one, and number two, it would seem that if we spent |
02:10:59.68 | Kellerman | less upfront on a premium, but we had a higher deductible, then we could potentially, as a council, have a policy to redirect those extra funds |
02:11:09.81 | Kellerman | into risk mitigation. Is that |
02:11:12.45 | Kellerman | Am I understanding this issue correctly? |
02:11:21.58 | Kellerman | . |
02:11:21.97 | Sophia Collier | I know. |
02:11:22.24 | Kellerman | Yeah. |
02:11:22.55 | Sophia Collier | Okay. |
02:11:23.05 | Sophia Collier | Okay. |
02:11:23.19 | Unknown | Chad, if I may help with this one, maybe you can put the slide that actually has our proposed premiums. |
02:11:23.34 | Sophia Collier | Bye. |
02:11:23.39 | Unknown | . |
02:11:23.47 | Sophia Collier | you're not. |
02:11:23.52 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:11:28.79 | Unknown | Yeah, let me bring that up. |
02:11:31.39 | Unknown | No, that's all right. |
02:11:33.62 | Kellerman | I'm just trying to understand where we're going to be out of pocket. |
02:11:36.10 | Kellerman | based on historical |
02:11:37.95 | Kellerman | costs. |
02:11:39.23 | Unknown | So yeah, this slide I think would help. |
02:11:41.85 | Unknown | you |
02:11:41.92 | Unknown | Yes. |
02:11:42.04 | Unknown | Yes. |
02:11:44.94 | Unknown | So, |
02:11:47.44 | Unknown | Historically, the city has enjoyed a $50,000 self-insured retention, which means that typically after the city pays for the preliminary cost of investigation, |
02:11:57.41 | Unknown | Um, |
02:11:58.32 | Unknown | you know, and maybe some initial defense costs and discovery work |
02:12:02.91 | Unknown | the Bay cities basically handled the rest of the settlement of a claim |
02:12:07.52 | Unknown | until completion. |
02:12:09.09 | Unknown | Um, |
02:12:09.93 | Unknown | You know, at this point, there are really are only two options for the city, either private insurance, which we would obtain through hub, which would provide us with a |
02:12:21.31 | Unknown | $400K self-insured retention, meaning the city pays for the first $400K. |
02:12:26.06 | Unknown | of |
02:12:27.21 | Unknown | losses for any claim that is filed against the city. |
02:12:30.37 | Unknown | Um, |
02:12:31.14 | Unknown | versus under Prism, you would pay |
02:12:34.28 | Unknown | 500k out of losses for any general liability claim. So those general liability claims- |
02:12:37.64 | Kellerman | Those general liability under, under the pool. |
02:12:41.18 | Unknown | Under the pool, it was 50,000. |
02:12:43.88 | Kellerman | Okay. |
02:12:43.92 | Unknown | Okay. Before October. |
02:12:46.11 | Kellerman | So the council is going to need to consider where we might... |
02:12:49.59 | Kellerman | have some, I don't want to call them reserves, but extra funds to pay above and beyond the 50,000. Because we haven't reduced our litigation or risk because we haven't hired a risk manager yet. We want to, but we... |
02:13:01.91 | Kellerman | a sensibly or still kind of subject to the same risk profile. |
02:13:06.61 | Unknown | Yes, and in the budget, I'm setting aside |
02:13:10.07 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
02:13:10.14 | Unknown | to pay those claims. |
02:13:10.16 | Kellerman | Yeah. |
02:13:12.82 | Kellerman | Okay, and where are you setting that aside? |
02:13:15.03 | Unknown | Yeah. So I set that aside and what's called our, it's an internal, it's an internal service fund under gap. |
02:13:21.02 | Unknown | But what it is, is the standalone fund where we accumulate resources to pay these claims. |
02:13:27.02 | Unknown | So we've had this for a number of years. |
02:13:29.38 | Unknown | but we haven't really been accumulating resources because we've had such a |
02:13:33.73 | Unknown | a favorable small |
02:13:35.50 | Unknown | SIR of 50,000 that we didn't need excessive resources. |
02:13:40.26 | Unknown | In this budget, I am proposing we transfer $750,000, that SIR set aside, |
02:13:47.44 | Unknown | to the South |
02:13:48.94 | Unknown | the internal service fund, our self-insurance fund, |
02:13:53.24 | Unknown | to pay those claims that, |
02:13:55.64 | Unknown | we as the city would be responsible for. |
02:13:58.82 | Unknown | So I am setting dollars aside to pay those claims in this budget. |
02:14:03.23 | Kellerman | Okay. |
02:14:03.74 | Unknown | If we don't spend them, then they are there to roll over to the next year or spend on |
02:14:11.38 | Unknown | additional risk mitigation activities. |
02:14:14.47 | Kellerman | So thank you, that makes sense. I just want to make sure that that amount of money |
02:14:19.14 | Kellerman | would cover what we incurred last year. If we imagine there's no reason to |
02:14:25.00 | Kellerman | envision a change in circumstance. |
02:14:27.41 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:14:28.34 | Unknown | I believe it will. |
02:14:29.35 | Unknown | I don't have a crystal ball. And again, I... |
02:14:32.81 | Unknown | could be completely wrong, but I believe that would be sufficient. |
02:14:36.57 | Unknown | to pay those claims. |
02:14:38.68 | Unknown | It could be famous last words. I hope not. I mean, |
02:14:38.78 | Kellerman | Okay. |
02:14:43.09 | Unknown | Yeah, I ran out of crystal ball polish. |
02:14:44.12 | Kellerman | Crystal Ball Pollack. Yeah, we're trying to figure it out. OK, just two more questions. Let me switch so others can move on. |
02:14:46.46 | Unknown | Okay. |
02:14:51.39 | Kellerman | So you mentioned personnel costs. Today we talked about the manner in which you were envisioning the personnel costs, the costs as of today, not as of fully built out departments. |
02:15:05.03 | Kellerman | But I thought I heard you say something differently in your presentation. |
02:15:08.32 | Unknown | No. Okay. So this slide here, I think is what you're, what you're referring to. So I, I have |
02:15:15.02 | Unknown | I'm projecting for full employment. |
02:15:17.31 | Unknown | our goal is to employ all of our positions or fill all of our positions. So I'm assuming that we |
02:15:23.34 | Unknown | achieve that goal. |
02:15:25.24 | Unknown | The change that I've made is what do I budget for salary for those individuals? |
02:15:30.78 | Unknown | That was the change from fiscal year 24 to fiscal year 25. |
02:15:30.98 | Katie Thau Garcia | Yeah. |
02:15:35.54 | Unknown | both assumed |
02:15:36.99 | Unknown | full employment, that's Kathy's goal. |
02:15:39.37 | Unknown | is to fill those positions and provide great service to our community. |
02:15:43.18 | Unknown | And that's reflected in the budget. But where I budget them has been scaled back |
02:15:48.82 | Unknown | to a more realistic level in terms of dollars. |
02:15:52.97 | Kellerman | Okay, so you're changing the methodology between last year's budget and this year's budget? |
02:15:57.10 | Unknown | Yes. |
02:15:57.74 | Unknown | in wages. |
02:15:59.36 | Unknown | Because last year, for example, |
02:16:02.23 | Unknown | When I do |
02:16:03.04 | Unknown | I budgeted that the finance director position would be filled. |
02:16:07.01 | Unknown | but it was budgeted at the highest wage |
02:16:10.57 | Unknown | that I could earn. |
02:16:12.34 | Unknown | And I'm not at the highest step. |
02:16:15.21 | Unknown | So that was budgetary slack. |
02:16:17.30 | Unknown | that we are over budgeting. |
02:16:19.48 | Unknown | There's no way that I would be paid the top step. |
02:16:22.60 | Unknown | unless I quit and you had to hire somebody at top step. |
02:16:25.81 | Unknown | So what I'm doing this year is I'm saying, okay, Chad's going to be here for the full year. |
02:16:30.46 | Unknown | and Chad's wage is X, |
02:16:32.74 | Unknown | and I anticipate Chad gets |
02:16:34.34 | Unknown | a small or a cola. |
02:16:36.49 | Unknown | based upon |
02:16:38.01 | Unknown | previous negotiations. |
02:16:40.10 | Unknown | And that's where I'm budgeting wages. I'm not making the assumption that we have to pay top steps. |
02:16:44.98 | Unknown | for all positions in fiscal year 25. |
02:16:48.82 | Kellerman | Okay, so it's fully belted out staff, but they're giving lower wages. |
02:16:53.06 | Unknown | No, I'm budgeting that. I'm not giving, I'm not, yes, I'm budgeting |
02:16:57.82 | Unknown | lower lower |
02:16:59.51 | Unknown | a more realistic wage where they are currently at |
02:17:02.86 | Unknown | plus their adjustment for that year. |
02:17:05.33 | Kellerman | It is a... |
02:17:05.45 | Unknown | Go ahead. |
02:17:06.78 | Kellerman | into account the labor negotiations we undertook and the decisions we made. |
02:17:09.65 | Unknown | Is it amazing? Yes, it does. |
02:17:12.42 | Kellerman | I see. |
02:17:13.65 | Kellerman | Okay, and then just for everyone's benefit, because we talked about it today as well, I asked about how recent decisions regarding the downtown might impact our budget moving forward. We talked about the loss of 31 parking spots that you had said was an average value of around $7,500. We talked about the BID and the cost and the city's contribution there. And can you just share just from the timing perspective why it's not included in this budget cycle? |
02:17:34.96 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:17:35.03 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:17:35.06 | Unknown | Can you- |
02:17:35.18 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:17:35.21 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:17:39.70 | Unknown | Yeah, so the bid was not included in the budget cycle. |
02:17:44.00 | Unknown | again, because I wasn't sure where we were going with this. |
02:17:46.62 | Unknown | I did remove, let me go down to this. |
02:17:49.71 | Unknown | Let me find that fire. |
02:17:51.80 | Unknown | Apologize here. |
02:17:55.99 | Unknown | Yep, so the CDA contract has been removed. |
02:17:59.60 | Unknown | um, |
02:18:00.37 | Unknown | Right here. |
02:18:01.54 | Unknown | This is basically the CDA contract. |
02:18:03.87 | Unknown | We still have the destination Sausalito in the budget, and I still have |
02:18:08.68 | Unknown | maintenance of those lights in the budget. So we have |
02:18:12.37 | Unknown | about $20,000 of the original 90 |
02:18:16.02 | Unknown | that we have paid in the past. |
02:18:17.75 | Unknown | And that was factored into the bid. |
02:18:19.92 | Unknown | the bid calculations that we had talked about |
02:18:22.89 | Unknown | I do not have that full contribution in here because I'm not sure where the council chooses to go. |
02:18:29.55 | Kellerman | Okay, and the last question about revenue, have you have you taken a look sorry this is a new question we didn't discuss this earlier today. At the impact of properties coming on and off the tax roll. So if there is a private property, the city acquires like the Bank of America building we used to collect property taxes on it, we no longer collect property taxes on it. Yeah. |
02:18:35.36 | Unknown | Okay. |
02:18:47.84 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:18:48.30 | Kellerman | Um, similarly, I don't know, let's say the corporation yard city owned. We don't, there's no taxes on it. If it went to a private developer, there would be taxes. Have you looked at that at all in terms of revenue? |
02:18:58.49 | Unknown | No, no, I haven't. I can certainly look up what the Bank of America building was contributing before our acquisition, and that would be an easy request or an easy ask. |
02:19:09.04 | Unknown | I could do some analysis on the corp yard based upon land values, but we would have to make assumptions on improved costs per se. |
02:19:15.97 | Unknown | But certainly something we could consider. |
02:19:19.40 | Kellerman | Okay. Yeah. City has some, um, |
02:19:21.53 | Unknown | We have a lot of properties. |
02:19:22.77 | Kellerman | I could go into private ownership. |
02:19:24.34 | Unknown | Yeah, I agree. You're welcome. |
02:19:24.70 | Kellerman | All right. |
02:19:26.52 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:19:27.18 | Unknown | Mm. |
02:19:27.70 | Unknown | Vice mayor. |
02:19:29.34 | Cox | I just wanted to actually follow on the second to the last line of questioning regarding FTEs. So can you go back to that slide about our staffing expense? |
02:19:39.95 | Craig Merrilees | Thank you. |
02:19:39.97 | Unknown | Yeah. Yep. |
02:19:43.14 | Unknown | Who, I think you're after that one, this one. |
02:19:47.26 | Cox | Yes. So, you know, we have in our packet this evening SWOT analyses from each of the department heads, many of which discussed opportunities for shared services, for, you know, going to part-time on some of their employees. And so I'm curious, with those... |
02:20:14.87 | Cox | suggestions by department heads |
02:20:17.92 | Cox | and knowing that we're facing a deficit, why we would make the assumption |
02:20:21.62 | Cox | that we're going to be |
02:20:24.69 | Cox | uh, |
02:20:27.37 | Cox | that we're going to have a 100% full roster. We never have had. We always have openings. And so I feel as though it would be more accurate to budget for the openings that we know we already have |
02:20:40.33 | Cox | And perhaps I'm certainly not |
02:20:43.83 | Cox | recommending a RIF, but I am recommending |
02:20:47.93 | Cox | a pause on filling |
02:20:50.44 | Cox | empty positions, particularly where department heads see an opportunity to utilize part-time, to utilize additional fundraising, and some of the other strategies that were proposed in the SWOT analyses that we received. |
02:21:06.52 | Cox | from the various department heads. So can you... |
02:21:09.56 | Cox | address why we are not |
02:21:12.88 | Cox | factoring into account that reality in our, and I understand we you're doing it the way we've done it in the past, but I'm challenged to consider a different approach this year as we're looking at a million dollar structural deficit. Yeah, yeah. Actually be real. |
02:21:19.65 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:21:25.54 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:21:28.81 | Unknown | So, yes, you have a great point. |
02:21:33.76 | Unknown | We know that we are going to have vacancies. We know that we have turnover. We know that it takes time to fill those positions. |
02:21:41.01 | Unknown | Um, |
02:21:42.16 | Unknown | Yes, there is going to be salary savings in this budget. |
02:21:46.19 | Unknown | But I am. |
02:21:48.20 | Unknown | I'm going |
02:21:49.79 | Unknown | this direction, assuming full employment with the goal that we can get there. |
02:21:54.28 | Unknown | Because in the event that we do reach it, I would need to come back later to council and ask for additional dollars at that point. |
02:22:00.89 | Unknown | Um, |
02:22:01.67 | Unknown | Our salary savings in the past has been |
02:22:06.04 | Unknown | I mean, it varies significantly. If I had to put a guess on what, |
02:22:11.42 | Unknown | is available in salary savings for fiscal year 25. It's probably maybe in the $300,000, $400,000 range. I don't think there's a, |
02:22:19.46 | Unknown | significant |
02:22:20.79 | Unknown | amount of excess like there was last year. |
02:22:23.37 | Unknown | But there is some wiggle room |
02:22:26.10 | Unknown | within that salary line item. So yes, there is, |
02:22:31.62 | Unknown | Yes, I agree that you have a point, but I... |
02:22:35.18 | Unknown | truly feel we should budget for full employment. |
02:22:39.37 | Unknown | And we can disagree, or you can direct me to... |
02:22:41.78 | Unknown | rework my budget. |
02:22:43.98 | Unknown | to not budget at full employment. Yeah. |
02:22:46.57 | Cox | Yeah. So if we asked for it, would you be able to give us a roster of each department and how, where it currently stands on number of employees budgeted for and number of employees presently existing? Correct. |
02:23:01.76 | Unknown | Currently filled. Yeah, yeah, that would be an easy task. |
02:23:03.67 | Cox | Yeah, that would be an easy task. I would like to see that as part of our decision-making process at our next meeting. So that we, because we've certainly promised the city manager that we're not going to seek a reduction in force. But I don't know that we need to be aggressively hiring for every position if department heads see an opportunity to save future rifts by maintaining current staffing levels. |
02:23:10.55 | Unknown | Okay. |
02:23:31.66 | Unknown | You know, I think creative staffing is a solution. One example in my finance department, we've |
02:23:31.73 | Cox | you know. |
02:23:32.12 | Cox | Thank you. |
02:23:37.64 | Unknown | we've brought on interns. |
02:23:39.26 | Unknown | Um, |
02:23:40.15 | Unknown | local college interns who want to get experience and we're |
02:23:43.98 | Unknown | giving them an opportunity to see government work. |
02:23:47.61 | Unknown | So, yeah, I think there are creative ways that we can fill staffing needs. |
02:23:47.90 | Cox | Yeah, I think |
02:23:52.30 | Cox | And I also, okay, and I don't want to, I did have a question also about turnover. So, yeah. |
02:24:00.20 | Cox | maybe this is for Catherine, but the 14% turnover that we're still experiencing |
02:24:06.26 | Cox | Is that |
02:24:07.69 | Cox | in your view, related at all to |
02:24:10.44 | Cox | our |
02:24:11.22 | Cox | the competitiveness of our salaries? Are we still seeing a large rate of attrition because we aren't competitive in our salaries? I was hoping we had addressed that through the actions we took in our labor negotiations. |
02:24:25.88 | Kathy Nikitas | Sure. I can't say exactly how much of that is attributable to salaries. I think there have been a couple of people who have left because they felt that they could make better money elsewhere. But again, there was retirement. There were, you know, one person left definitely for salaries. Another person left because they had personal situation that they just needed to move out of the area. So left definitely for salaries. Another person left because they had personal situation that they just needed to move out of the area. So I think overall we're doing well with our salaries, but some of the positions that we haven't been able to fill may be due to salaries. We're one of them risk manager, as we've discussed, and that just launched this afternoon at 4 o'clock, by the way. It's out on Cal Ops again. |
02:24:47.16 | Unknown | you. |
02:25:14.62 | Kathy Nikitas | with the new range. |
02:25:15.36 | Cox | Is it your practice when someone leaves to do an exit interview to identify the real reason that they're leaving? |
02:25:24.71 | Kathy Nikitas | It is. It is. We have... |
02:25:27.98 | Kathy Nikitas | Thank you. |
02:25:28.00 | Cox | Thank you. |
02:25:28.03 | Unknown | No. |
02:25:28.22 | Cox | Mm-hmm. |
02:25:29.18 | Kathy Nikitas | We have kind of beefed up that part of our process after being a little bit depressed for a while, but we absolutely are, and I... |
02:25:40.81 | Kathy Nikitas | because we have to let people know this is going to be confidential and I'm going to aggregate information. Um, but I've gotten some, some good responses. |
02:25:49.57 | Kathy Nikitas | Oh, |
02:25:50.39 | Kathy Nikitas | Overall, I haven't seen it be more than 50 or 60%. I haven't seen it be for money purposes. So I think we're doing okay in general, but we can always certainly do better. But I think the work that was done last year for the labor agreements has really, really helped for our stability. |
02:25:53.99 | Unknown | you know, |
02:25:54.24 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
02:26:12.08 | Cox | Thank you, and thank you for the arrow moving in a positive direction in terms of lowering the rate of |
02:26:19.76 | Kathy Nikitas | Absolutely. It takes a whole team and we're all working on it together. |
02:26:23.32 | Cox | Thank you. |
02:26:23.81 | Unknown | Thank you, vice mayor, council member, Boston or Hoffman. |
02:26:28.99 | Unknown | Constable Mayor Hoffman. |
02:26:32.99 | Councilman Hoffman | So Chad, we also talked earlier today, so thank you for your time. I know you're busy. |
02:26:37.78 | Councilman Hoffman | Principally, we talked about two things, and one was... |
02:26:43.04 | Councilman Hoffman | If we look at slide 16. |
02:26:45.83 | Councilman Hoffman | That's where we're talking about the change in the |
02:26:50.72 | Councilman Hoffman | the change in the, |
02:26:52.02 | Councilman Hoffman | Budget. |
02:26:53.18 | Councilman Hoffman | for the SIR, general liability SIR. |
02:26:56.04 | Unknown | Yeah, slide 16 right here. |
02:26:58.67 | Councilman Hoffman | I think that's, yeah, this is, yeah. |
02:27:02.03 | Unknown | Right. |
02:27:03.88 | Councilman Hoffman | It's not that slide. |
02:27:05.05 | Unknown | Not that one. This one, then, I would imagine. |
02:27:08.90 | Councilman Hoffman | General Insurance. |
02:27:11.02 | Councilman Hoffman | Right here. Insurance new slide. |
02:27:11.31 | Unknown | Right here. |
02:27:13.84 | Unknown | Okay, I'm gonna go to the even newer slide. |
02:27:17.06 | Unknown | That's okay. |
02:27:17.22 | Councilman Hoffman | Yeah. |
02:27:18.63 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:27:18.70 | Councilman Hoffman | Yeah, yeah. |
02:27:18.87 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:27:24.40 | Councilman Hoffman | Oh, that's... So there... |
02:27:25.53 | Unknown | . |
02:27:25.55 | Unknown | So they're... |
02:27:26.31 | Councilman Hoffman | Hold on, is that attached to the agenda? |
02:27:29.84 | Unknown | So this one was |
02:27:31.49 | Unknown | was sent out. |
02:27:32.67 | Unknown | And then this one was updated at 530 because we got more information from PRISM. |
02:27:36.44 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you. |
02:27:36.96 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay, gotcha. |
02:27:38.04 | Unknown | So this is |
02:27:39.52 | Councilman Hoffman | question still yeah my question still |
02:27:41.09 | Unknown | It's still relevant. It's still up here. |
02:27:43.02 | Councilman Hoffman | So let me ask you this. |
02:27:46.07 | Councilman Hoffman | I think this might be part of the confusion. So... |
02:27:49.48 | Councilman Hoffman | the top line says PRISM general liability 500,000 SIR, right? |
02:27:54.90 | Councilman Hoffman | And then why is it budgeted there, original budget, the top line? |
02:28:01.04 | Unknown | Right up here. |
02:28:01.82 | Councilman Hoffman | Yep. |
02:28:02.95 | Councilman Hoffman | The top line there says 1.795. |
02:28:06.51 | Unknown | Yep, right here. Yep. |
02:28:06.98 | Councilman Hoffman | Right. |
02:28:08.23 | Councilman Hoffman | So what does that number represent then? If that's not the SIR, the SIRs |
02:28:11.23 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:28:12.60 | Unknown | No, so this 1.7 million represents the premium |
02:28:18.84 | Unknown | or prism. |
02:28:20.16 | Unknown | plus 750,000. |
02:28:23.53 | Unknown | And then I also included that $750,000 down on a second line item. That's my error. So my error is right here. |
02:28:32.88 | Councilman Hoffman | I got the air. I got the part that I'm not sure. I'm not so sure. I'm not clear on that number. The $750,000. What is the basis for that number? |
02:28:34.00 | Unknown | Yep. |
02:28:34.39 | Unknown | part that |
02:28:34.81 | Unknown | Yep. |
02:28:35.06 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:28:35.48 | Unknown | I'm, |
02:28:35.78 | Unknown | I'm not sure. |
02:28:36.00 | Unknown | you |
02:28:46.45 | Unknown | we're looking at |
02:28:48.17 | Unknown | previous losses, we're trying to estimate what we think is a reasonable set-aside number. I don't have a... |
02:28:56.32 | Unknown | an exact science on estimating this. |
02:28:59.23 | Unknown | I could be conservative. I could be way off on this. |
02:28:59.27 | Katie Thau Garcia | All right. |
02:28:59.29 | Unknown | I couldn't. |
02:29:03.73 | Unknown | It really depends on our experience on what type of claims we receive. |
02:29:08.29 | Councilman Hoffman | So the $500,000 on the, |
02:29:11.24 | Councilman Hoffman | of the SIR. |
02:29:12.98 | Unknown | Right here. Yep. |
02:29:14.68 | Councilman Hoffman | That's, that's, that's referenced later when you're talking about what, you know, |
02:29:22.33 | Councilman Hoffman | the mechanism of how we're going to insure ourselves. |
02:29:25.50 | Councilman Hoffman | But the 1.795,795,000 or- |
02:29:27.62 | Kevin McGowan | That's... |
02:29:30.41 | Councilman Hoffman | the intended 1,400 |
02:29:33.83 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay. |
02:29:33.85 | Kevin McGowan | Okay. |
02:29:34.04 | Unknown | Okay, yeah. |
02:29:34.76 | Councilman Hoffman | 45,000. |
02:29:36.18 | Councilman Hoffman | I mean, that's also just sort of an estimate number. |
02:29:38.93 | Unknown | So this here- |
02:29:40.00 | Councilman Hoffman | My point is maybe that estimate number because they're just estimates. |
02:29:43.91 | Unknown | No, this is our premium. |
02:29:46.12 | Unknown | The uncertainty around our cost is going to be on this GLL and property SIR set aside. |
02:29:53.53 | Unknown | This is a known cost. |
02:29:55.69 | Unknown | It's pretty firm. |
02:29:57.83 | Unknown | It's a little squishy still. |
02:30:00.02 | Unknown | We do have certainty on the PRISM property coverages. |
02:30:05.21 | Unknown | But this year is still a little squishy as far as the estimate. I don't expect it to go too much farther from this. |
02:30:12.11 | Unknown | This represents our premium. That is paid July 1st. |
02:30:16.80 | Unknown | we are probably, |
02:30:18.25 | Unknown | transferring |
02:30:19.50 | Unknown | any loss above $500,000, |
02:30:22.30 | Unknown | through the pool. So that represents a cost out the door day one. |
02:30:26.59 | Unknown | The $750,000 SIR set aside, that is an estimate |
02:30:33.07 | Unknown | And it will change based upon our claims experience. If we have zero claims, I'm not gonna spend any of that. |
02:30:40.29 | Unknown | A lot of claims, we're going to spend more than that. |
02:30:44.49 | Councilman Hoffman | Karen Hollweg, yeah because our our limit Okay, thank you so much for explaining that that wasn't clear even after we talked this morning so. Karen Hollweg, But this. Karen Hollweg, That means that. Karen Hollweg, I know. Karen Hollweg, yep well that's good. Karen Hollweg, So what I don't see budgeted in here, though, is an estimate for. |
02:30:51.82 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
02:30:52.20 | Unknown | Glad to help. |
02:30:52.93 | Kevin McGowan | you |
02:30:53.03 | Unknown | Yep, you're welcome. |
02:30:53.69 | Kevin McGowan | it's a good thing. |
02:30:59.66 | Councilman Hoffman | attorney's fees that we're going to have to pay now to defend our claims. Because before we had a 50, I understand it. We had a $50,000 premium |
02:31:04.57 | Mary Hudson | Thank you. |
02:31:04.61 | Unknown | Correct. |
02:31:08.94 | Councilman Hoffman | Anything over $50,000 we tendered the claim and the insurance company paid the cost of defense correct |
02:31:15.00 | Unknown | That is correct. |
02:31:16.01 | Councilman Hoffman | As well as settling the matter in excess of $50,000. So now I see a significant expense for us just defending claims, regardless of how much they're made for, between $0,000 and $500,000. Would you agree that's correct? |
02:31:34.83 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:31:34.85 | Unknown | I would agree. If the claim is estimated to be |
02:31:39.94 | Unknown | 200,000. |
02:31:41.12 | Unknown | the insurer is not going to look at it. We would be responsible to |
02:31:45.83 | Unknown | defend and negotiate that claim. |
02:31:48.62 | Unknown | One of the job responsibilities of that risk manager would be to help manage this process. |
02:31:55.18 | Unknown | We wouldn't have to seek outside legal advice for all claims. |
02:31:59.70 | Unknown | some of those claims, the lower end claims I feel, could be handled by a risk manager in-house. |
02:32:06.15 | Unknown | But yes, you are correct. Legal costs will be higher to defend those claims under a higher FIR. |
02:32:13.19 | Unknown | And part of that set aside of $750,000 is to cover some of those legal costs. |
02:32:19.75 | Councilman Hoffman | So I think, um, |
02:32:23.90 | Councilman Hoffman | Well, I'll take that later. Okay, so then the next thing is, |
02:32:29.07 | Councilman Hoffman | You would also... |
02:32:31.07 | Councilman Hoffman | agree that |
02:32:33.32 | Councilman Hoffman | even if we're, even though we have a, a, |
02:32:36.84 | Councilman Hoffman | Our liability limit is $500,000. The SIR is $500,000 per claim. |
02:32:45.38 | Councilman Hoffman | many times |
02:32:47.80 | Councilman Hoffman | even if we tender... |
02:32:50.40 | Councilman Hoffman | in addition to, you know, a tender claim and were covered by the insurance company, |
02:32:55.39 | Councilman Hoffman | we're usually asked to also |
02:32:57.42 | Councilman Hoffman | contribute additional money to settle a claim. |
02:33:01.06 | Councilman Hoffman | Correct. |
02:33:04.01 | Unknown | So I guess like a counter offer or what, I guess what? |
02:33:08.01 | Councilman Hoffman | No, we're sitting at this. Here comes our attorney. |
02:33:10.31 | Unknown | Yeah, thank you Sergio. |
02:33:10.92 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you, Sergio. You're right, Sergio. Thank you, Sergio. |
02:33:12.45 | Unknown | Yeah, short answer is yes. And really that tends to happen in the event of a coverage dispute where we have a particularly strange claim |
02:33:21.78 | Unknown | or we have inverse condemnation type claims where historically, you know, the city's contract arrangement with Bay cities is that there was a, |
02:33:31.70 | Unknown | 50-50 |
02:33:33.63 | Unknown | split between the pool and the city for inverse condemnation type claims. In PRISM, there's an exclusion for inverse condemnation claims. Private insurance, there's an exclusion for inverse condemnation claims. |
02:33:48.17 | Unknown | Yeah, the kinds of claims that are likely to be covered, you know, are going to decrease. |
02:33:54.44 | Unknown | And, you know, when we do have pollution type claims or things like that, again, usually there is some sort of exclusion and the pool or the insurer will demand, you know, a contribution. |
02:34:07.94 | Unknown | because they will dispute that there is coverage for the particular kind of claim. |
02:34:13.61 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay, thank you. |
02:34:15.04 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:34:15.06 | Unknown | Thank you, Sergio. |
02:34:16.02 | Councilman Hoffman | So those are my questions with regarding that issue. I'll have some comments on that. |
02:34:23.06 | Councilman Hoffman | And I'd like to move now to the salary and benefits. I think that's slide 19. Yeah. |
02:34:30.82 | Councilman Hoffman | I don't know what, it might be a new slide. What do you want? |
02:34:32.51 | Unknown | 21. |
02:34:33.52 | Councilman Hoffman | Here we go. Or is that just a new slide? |
02:34:34.31 | Unknown | Here we go. |
02:34:36.98 | Unknown | Oh. |
02:34:38.11 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay, so this issue of the percent, the change, the third column over there, the dollar change, |
02:34:44.18 | Councilman Hoffman | And the change in methodology for calculating our |
02:34:44.30 | Unknown | Yep. |
02:34:44.60 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
02:34:49.90 | Councilman Hoffman | calculating our salary |
02:34:52.15 | Councilman Hoffman | on the budget. We did talk about that in our, |
02:34:55.20 | Councilman Hoffman | 10-year modeling working group. |
02:34:57.41 | Councilman Hoffman | Do you recall that? |
02:34:58.92 | Unknown | I recall us discussing it, yes. |
02:35:01.82 | Councilman Hoffman | And is it your recollection, as it is mine, that |
02:35:05.72 | Councilman Hoffman | the |
02:35:06.63 | Councilman Hoffman | The consensus by at least two of us on that working group was not to change the methodology. |
02:35:11.88 | Unknown | I thought it was to continue at full employment. |
02:35:16.23 | Unknown | but not at top step. |
02:35:18.08 | Unknown | I, I, I, |
02:35:19.64 | Unknown | That's my recollection. I could be wrong. |
02:35:22.20 | Unknown | But that's my recollection, and that's why I went with this route. |
02:35:22.66 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you. |
02:35:26.57 | Councilman Hoffman | Did somebody did somebody direct you not to know? |
02:35:29.09 | Unknown | No, no, no, no, no, no, no. This was my decision. |
02:35:31.85 | Unknown | Okay. |
02:35:32.58 | Councilman Hoffman | So let's go back to these numbers then. |
02:35:37.27 | Councilman Hoffman | the 2025 number of $9,948,971 over the 2024 number resulted in the $483,105. |
02:35:53.12 | Councilman Hoffman | But you and I talked about this today. |
02:35:55.90 | Councilman Hoffman | And if you applied the same methodology that you applied in 25, |
02:36:00.56 | Councilman Hoffman | to 24 |
02:36:03.01 | Councilman Hoffman | that change would be |
02:36:04.88 | Councilman Hoffman | 1.1 million, correct? |
02:36:07.16 | Unknown | Correct. And that's, yeah, that's what I'm saying down here at the lower |
02:36:10.65 | Unknown | in the footnote disclosure, if you will. |
02:36:12.93 | Unknown | that this number here |
02:36:15.07 | Frank Millian | Thank you. |
02:36:15.12 | Unknown | if I applied the same methodology would be, |
02:36:15.14 | Frank Millian | Yeah. |
02:36:18.58 | Unknown | would be lower resulting in a higher change. |
02:36:22.67 | Councilman Hoffman | And it would be that 1.1 million. |
02:36:25.42 | Councilman Hoffman | The converse is true too. |
02:36:28.72 | Councilman Hoffman | If you apply the same methodology that you used in 2024 without change to 2025, |
02:36:33.99 | Councilman Hoffman | that dollar change |
02:36:35.36 | Councilman Hoffman | would be 1.1 million. |
02:36:37.62 | Unknown | Correct. And then we would have a higher deficit. |
02:36:40.72 | Unknown | projective deficit. |
02:36:44.57 | Councilman Hoffman | It's interesting that you phrase it that way, but I'm just getting to the point that |
02:36:48.38 | Councilman Hoffman | the change in methodology |
02:36:50.29 | Councilman Hoffman | I think has resulted in the 483 |
02:36:53.18 | Councilman Hoffman | accounting |
02:36:54.19 | Councilman Hoffman | But. |
02:36:55.42 | Unknown | It's on a boundary basis. |
02:36:57.29 | Unknown | It's a budgetary basis. And I'm trying to improve |
02:36:59.05 | Councilman Hoffman | I'm trying to... |
02:37:01.23 | Unknown | Right. Budgetary experience. |
02:37:01.24 | Councilman Hoffman | Right. |
02:37:03.08 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay, but my point is if you use the same consistent methodology, |
02:37:06.90 | Councilman Hoffman | The consistent response is, |
02:37:09.21 | Councilman Hoffman | You got 1.1 million. |
02:37:12.28 | Unknown | as a change. |
02:37:12.97 | Unknown | Correct. |
02:37:13.48 | Councilman Hoffman | Yep. |
02:37:14.12 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay. |
02:37:15.38 | Unknown | I'm not disputing that in terms of actual dollars, yes. |
02:37:19.43 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay. |
02:37:20.85 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay, thanks. |
02:37:22.30 | Unknown | Are you finished? |
02:37:25.56 | Unknown | Thank you very much. Any other questions? |
02:37:28.48 | Blaustein | I just have a few questions quickly for our city manager. And also a big thank you to Chad and to the insurance team for everything that you put together on this. So city manager, in reviewing your presentation and hearing from you, it seems like what you're asking from us is to essentially cover the deficit with the general fund balance that's unassigned. And then give you and your team more time to look at the care model that you're putting together. Could you just clarify that so that we would pass the budget as is, but that doesn't mean we're not going to make considerations and changes going forward? |
02:38:03.86 | Unknown | Thank you for the question, and that's correct. When I presented this first to the council, my recommendation was you want to maintain service levels for the community, for the businesses, for the visitors that come here, and drop dollars into your account so that you can provide services in the city. So you don't want to do that, disrupt that at this time. But what you do want to do is take and pay attention to what it is that you'd be looking at in terms of future years. And in future years, it takes, you know, what we did in 2021. And one of the things that I'm really, really cognizant of is there's something called management inertia. I have never been a victim of that. Whenever there's something that is wrong, we try to fix it. And that's exemplified in the numbers you see today. That's why you have $10.8 million in your audited five and 10 and unassigned cash, because we cut positions. We raised revenue through different means. So all of those are all important. So what I'm saying is when I need more time is I'm not going to sit in our hands, Northshed, we haven't, and we won't. |
02:39:14.05 | Unknown | consumed by this insurance challenge. And I think we've made great strides going from a $4 million worst case scenario to a $1 million worst case scenario. We need a little more time, which, you know, we hopefully you will give us. And we don't think that there is, I don't believe and would not recommend that there be any, you know, level of service reduction at this time until we've had time to look at some of these ideas, to look at some of the things that I know that are easily obtained, because a million-dollar problem on a $20 million general fund isn't a big problem. A $4 million problem is a huge problem, and that's what we were staring at a month ago. Two weeks ago, we were staring at a $2 million problem. Now we're staring at a $1 million problem. And I don't think that it'll take us the whole year to get to some budget solutions to figure out how to make this all sustainable. So I'm asking, yeah, exactly for that, Council Member Blaustein, Mayor and Council, a little bit of time to work with our team to bring forward the ideas and energy that I know that our |
02:40:15.47 | Unknown | our departments are bringing. Uh, but in order to do that, you know, and maintain service levels, it's going to take dipping into your unassigned cash for, uh, balancing this year's budget. |
02:40:28.45 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:40:29.56 | Unknown | All right. |
02:40:29.75 | Unknown | Okay, open public comment. |
02:40:30.98 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:40:31.00 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:40:31.03 | Unknown | No? |
02:40:32.30 | Unknown | Can you do this? We need to move along, so. |
02:40:36.92 | Unknown | Can you just ask those questions during the next session? |
02:40:41.09 | Unknown | Okay. All right. |
02:40:42.29 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:40:42.54 | Unknown | All right. |
02:40:50.59 | Unknown | Can you turn your mic on? |
02:40:52.65 | Councilman Hoffman | Sorry, thank you so much. I have a bad habit of not turning on my mic. |
02:40:55.92 | Councilman Hoffman | about how to lower, the steps to lower our risk profile over the next five years. And you sent me an email on June 4th |
02:41:05.93 | Councilman Hoffman | And there are seven |
02:41:08.11 | Councilman Hoffman | seven steps on this email, seven steps on the email to reduce our risk. A couple of those steps are included in your slide, but I don't see all of those, all of those steps. And I think these are important for us to talk about, certainly at our next meeting. And here, I'm going to read them off real quick. It's just going to take a minute. And then I would request that you forward that email out to the rest of the council, or at least include this if it's still your, if it's it's still your plan to lower our risk profile over the next five years. So one was review and update our policies and procedures and practices with an eye toward risk avoidance. Number two, invest in infrastructure, streets, sidewalks, buildings, and stairs to lower risk. Three, divest from sewer operation, as Sausleo did with fire service. Number four, hire a risk manager to assess 10-year history of losses and ensure risk review of current future programs. |
02:42:01.25 | Councilman Hoffman | work with insurance provider |
02:42:02.90 | Councilman Hoffman | staff and attorney to implement practices |
02:42:05.48 | Councilman Hoffman | and training to avoid lower |
02:42:07.64 | Councilman Hoffman | to avoid and lower claims. Review and create development land and |
02:42:13.51 | Councilman Hoffman | Sorry, review and create development and land use policy to consider the geologic hazard study recommendations for Miller Pacific and ongoing sea level rise vulnerability assessments. Number six, accelerated cybersecurity training by organization. Number seven, review of impossible acquisition of specialty insurance such as parametrics catastrophic coverage. Do you still believe that those are the steps to lower a risk profile over the next five years? |
02:42:44.28 | Unknown | Thank you for that question, Councilmember Hoffman. So the city council did receive that information. It was part of the information that the city attorney and I provided to PRISM. It really showed our rigor and intention to, you know, take this on. And I can say that when we approached them on June the 5th, we were told in May that that underwriting committee did not want to bring Sostito in. But when we started showing them exact concrete plans and steps that we believe were necessary for us in any scenario, including this scenario, we flipped that from a no vote to an 8-1 yes vote. So, yeah, those things are all really important. And, you know, some of them have started and they need to really continue, whether it's the landslide task force report that was done by Miller Pacific and figuring out new land use, you know, policy that, you know, mitigates or potentially mitigates people building on steep hillsides where there's no, you know, water. You know, that report is very helpful. You know, hiring a risk manager, that would be very helpful. looking at what we've got. And we've done some analysis of our insurance claims for the last 10 years. And of the 252 claims that we got over 10 years, you can see the trends. It wasn't every year there were 50, 25 claims. It were a few years where there were a lot of claims. And those events, you know, when you look at them as a pool would look at them, created this scenario that Sausalito could be a huge risk. And so we're facing these higher premiums. But I believe that they were isolated events that, you know, we will not see in the future if we do what we said we would do in those seven bullet points and then some. But it's all true. We need to do all of that and then some and then see where we are next year with our insurance costs because, you know, our plan is to make this, you know, the priority as it's been to try to find it but to actually implement it. |
02:44:37.34 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay, thank you. |
02:44:38.74 | Unknown | So now we'll open public comments. City Clerk, will you please give your instructions? |
02:44:42.35 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
02:44:43.60 | Mayor Sobieski | All right, Peter Van Meter. |
02:44:47.48 | Mayor Sobieski | that he'll be followed by Babette McDougall. |
02:44:52.81 | Unknown | by Mr. Van Meter. Please go ahead. |
02:44:55.30 | Peter Van Meter | Thank you. I strongly endorse the city manager's recommendation that you use the unassigned funds to transition your period of time while you're solving your insurance problem. |
02:45:06.28 | Peter Van Meter | And |
02:45:06.95 | Peter Van Meter | maintain full staffing, full city services. You've luckily, to do the good performance of prior councils and yourselves, you have that seven to $10 million available that is available. And this is the kind of circumstance where you need to deploy those funds. Thank you. |
02:45:24.88 | Mayor Sobieski | Rebecca McDougall. |
02:45:31.80 | McDougall | Thank you, Mr. City Clerk. |
02:45:34.09 | McDougall | I just want to, there's an awful lot that got covered here and I only get two minutes. So I just want to focus on |
02:45:41.84 | McDougall | There were quite a few comments about the city's real estate portfolio and how valuable that is. There's even been previous ideas about maybe we ought to sell one or two things just to pay off its deficit here or there. Now, I just want to put out one thing. There may be something that could be throw away on that list. I don't know. |
02:46:01.28 | McDougall | But when you look at the constitution of that portfolio, why in God's name is fiduciary agents, would you ever trade it? Thank you. |
02:46:14.73 | Mayor Sobieski | All right, see no further public speakers. |
02:46:17.27 | Unknown | All right, we'll close public comment and we'll bring it back up here. I'll kick things off just with a tentative motion to direct the city manager to maintain levels of service, following up on the vice mayor's suggestion to do present at the next special city council meeting, some information about whether we were to slow down hiring, whether that would be something to consider, but maintain levels of service. |
02:46:43.89 | Cox | May I make a friendly amendment? And also adopt the recommended reserve policy. |
02:46:48.80 | Cox | And |
02:46:49.12 | Unknown | Adopt the recommended 25% reserve policy. I guess I would leave it at that. That's the motion. |
02:46:55.87 | Kellerman | So for discussion. |
02:46:57.47 | Unknown | Yeah, he needs to be seconded. |
02:46:58.36 | Kellerman | I'll second it. |
02:46:58.92 | Unknown | it. |
02:46:59.09 | Unknown | Okay, so now emotions made the second and now we have discussion on that. Sure. But I cost remember coming. |
02:47:03.90 | Kellerman | Yeah, I really want to thank you, city manager. And I understand comments like the one made by Peter Van Meter around this is what the reserves are intended to do. And I know we always want to get to a balanced budget and we're trying very, very hard. I just want to just urge the team and perhaps with a hint of caution that I don't feel |
02:47:26.46 | Kellerman | I think the insurance is going to be a bigger problem, and here's why. Because we don't have an accounting |
02:47:32.52 | Kellerman | of the costs that have been incurred to date sitting in front of us in this budget conversation. We don't have, you know, this is what we've paid out of workers' comp. This is what we've paid out of slip and falls. This is where the costs were above the $50,000. And in this instance, moving forward, the city will now be liable. So we have that information. We just didn't put it together as part of this packet. And that is a concern because we don't have a full budget. |
02:47:59.38 | Kellerman | We don't have a full narrative as to how this insurance problem is going to impact us. And therefore, I'm cautious about... |
02:48:09.02 | Kellerman | accepting or approving the reserve policy until we have that information. But I would be comfortable with the remainder of the |
02:48:19.06 | Kellerman | of the pending motion. But until we actually have that lined out for us, and I think Constantine Rehoff made the point |
02:48:25.37 | Kellerman | I think it was you said, you know, well, what about the litigation costs? I mean, if this goes, it's not even a settlement, it's cost of attorneys. So that should be a part of this packet. And we know we have it. |
02:48:33.77 | Unknown | Could I modify my motion then to give additional direction since we have a special meeting next to include some sensitivity analysis around what you just said for the reserve policy? |
02:48:43.06 | Kellerman | Yeah, I think it's even more than sensitivity. I think it's an actual audit. We have, we know how much we paid. We know how much we have. |
02:48:48.91 | Unknown | The meeting is next week, so I went staff to give it. That's the direction. They have to provide it. But if they don't, we sought to approve the budget, so we're going to. |
02:48:55.24 | Kellerman | Okay, well, are you open to not including adoption of the reserve policy until we have that information? |
02:49:02.61 | Cox | I think, I mean, in my view, the reserve policy is sacrosanct. We can dip into fund balance, but I am really committed. |
02:49:02.82 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
02:49:02.83 | John DeRay | I think. |
02:49:18.34 | Cox | to keeping that reserve policy at that level as a hedge against future. |
02:49:25.02 | Kellerman | I totally agree. I think it should be higher. |
02:49:26.56 | Cox | That's what I'm saying. Completely agree. But with that fund balance at its current level, I don't think it needs to be higher this year. |
02:49:28.16 | Kellerman | I believe that you can |
02:49:28.99 | Kellerman | But with that, |
02:49:33.58 | Kellerman | except for the, pardon me, Mayor, except for the risk that we are unaware of regarding insurance and litigation costs. |
02:49:39.94 | Cox | Right. |
02:49:40.70 | Cox | our fund balance is high enough because this is the first year where we're encountering these challenges, I believe we can rely on our fund balance to mitigate those challenges as we gather data and become more confident in our projections. I also hesitate to |
02:50:00.02 | Cox | formally enunciate a |
02:50:03.55 | Cox | an amount that we're going to put aside to settle claims, because in my view, that invites claims. And so- |
02:50:10.03 | Kellerman | So agree. Also agree. Don't want that. I want a back looking audit to say, right. If we were under what we're going forward with, we were under that last year. Right. What would we have had to come up with? |
02:50:20.46 | Cox | And I also, and it's not my turn to speak, but I'll just, one more response to you is, I also, in looking at the analysis that the city manager provided to us of prior claims, |
02:50:30.01 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
02:50:30.03 | McDougall | I mean, |
02:50:33.96 | Cox | you know, a huge majority of our expense and numerosity of claims related to the 2019 landslide and the homeless encampment and that's a huge majority of the claims that really caused this whole. |
02:50:51.34 | Cox | phenomenon to occur. And so I also have confidence, if you look at our track record this year, that our SIR projections are likely adequate. |
02:51:04.70 | Cox | Thank you. |
02:51:04.72 | Kellerman | In the absence of a black swan event. In the absence of another black swan event. If you have an opinion by smear as to the first dollar versus paying a lesser amount, but having to have a higher deductible or a lower deductible, because he presented us with options. Right. |
02:51:06.58 | Cox | is what you're saying. |
02:51:08.62 | Cox | If you have an opinion on that, |
02:51:22.32 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
02:51:22.34 | Cox | Thank you. |
02:51:22.59 | Kellerman | So. |
02:51:22.96 | Cox | So... |
02:51:24.89 | Cox | I would take the finance manager's recommendation for this year. |
02:51:31.11 | Cox | But we can certainly, listen, we have mid-year. |
02:51:34.56 | Cox | And we have September care. We have midyear. We have opportunities to recalibrate as necessary as we learn more information. |
02:51:43.45 | Unknown | Yeah, so my thought was just leave the motion as is, but with a consensus direction that the |
02:51:48.88 | Unknown | reserve policy needs some refinement. It's not just the amount. |
02:51:52.01 | Unknown | But. |
02:51:52.50 | Unknown | We also need to talk about when we would use it. |
02:51:54.64 | Unknown | I mean, I note that we had never, we haven't used our reserves in the pandemic. We didn't use our reserves in the landslide. |
02:52:01.51 | Unknown | We haven't used our reserves in the |
02:52:03.38 | Unknown | Great economic recession. We've always used, as the vice mayor said, our excess cash. So we actually want to know what are our reserves for? Like when is an emergency? And you could even tie, for example, automatic spending cuts to when you tap into the reserve. |
02:52:17.79 | Kellerman | Yeah, it's an excellent point. And I think this is maybe what we'll tackle at the next meeting because excess cash for me is a misnomer when I know we have $18 million worth of deferred sewer maintenance and MLK deferred maintenance. And so we're just sort of playing with the money in that respect. Is it really excess cash? Or is it cash that we could have used to fix our roads and our streets? And we didn't. And so that's what I want us to be really factual about. And I know these are put into funds and they have these names and they're called reserves and they're called excess cash, but I want to really be pragmatic about how do we fix our roads? How do we make ourselves more resilient? |
02:52:51.58 | Unknown | I would like to respond to that because I called for that 10 year model last year, right? |
02:52:52.64 | Kellerman | I'd like to. |
02:52:56.08 | Unknown | First person to do that. Yeah, because- What's the status? It's, you know, our overworked staff is turning the crank. They just pulled the rabbit out of the hat of the insurance. So you don't have to city manager, |
02:53:06.56 | Unknown | the timeline is on getting that model done. But the point of it is, my colleague is, |
02:53:12.48 | Unknown | I just want to share my narrative is Soslito has actually been run as a financial organization extremely well. We've had multiple years of surpluses. We don't have a financing problem, finance problem. We do have an infrastructure problem. It's exactly to your point. And we've never made the policy choice of are we going to try to fix our tens of millions of dollars of infrastructure by bleeding off a little bit of excess fund balance every year? Are we really going to solve it? I do think that's a strategic choice for us to make, but this is just about balancing the books. We are not gonna solve the tens of millions of sewer or roads or buildings. |
02:53:48.07 | Kellerman | Yeah. |
02:53:48.26 | Unknown | Yeah. |
02:53:48.88 | Unknown | uh, needling around the margins. |
02:53:51.11 | Kellerman | I totally agree with you on that, Mary. I just want to. |
02:53:53.74 | Kellerman | express and put on the record for the public my different perspective to say, oh, we never pulled from our reserves and we had excess cash and didn't we do great and we're financially super sound when I'm looking around and I see deferred maintenance, I see potholes, I see sidewalks that need work. And so I'm not willing to |
02:54:09.72 | Kellerman | put this blanket nomenclature on and pat myself on the back, I really feel like deferred maintenance is a big issue when you own it. |
02:54:16.35 | Cox | But at the same time, I want to recognize the good work we're doing. So we've just adopted new sewer collection rates that include spending $7 million a year on deferred maintenance. We've analyzed, we've done TVing of the entire sewer line system to understand where the most critical repairs lie. And we've enunciated a long-range plan for addressing that, and we've adopted rates for the next three years to finance that. We're also actively working on sewer consolidation so that we turn that role over to the experts who are more efficiently and cost-effectively able to carry those out. So that's one way we're addressing sewers. We're addressing sidewalks by placing the responsibility where it belongs and helping to finance those repairs. We're slowly rolling out that plan so as not to overly burden any group in Sausalito, but we're actively addressing that. We're actively undertaking a survey of all of our buildings and city-owned properties so that we can evaluate what's needed and come up with a long-range plan for addressing that. So I do believe that while we as many municipalities suffer the malady of long deferred maintenance, we are actively and proactively undertaking that challenge. |
02:55:42.91 | Blaustein | I appreciate that. Thank you. Can I add one thing to that? Thank you. Just as we're talking about deferred maintenance and $18 million in deferred maintenance and the work that we are doing, let's remind ourselves as well of Measure L, which every year is dedicated specifically to infrastructure to address deferred maintenance. And while you are saying there's $18 million in deferred maintenance, which we should own, Measure L will generate $28 million over the 10 years. So that is going directly to assessing and directing that deferred maintenance. So while it might not be excess cash, it is definitely dedicated to and for specifically infrastructure costs and addressing the deferred maintenance. And that's something that we at the council put on the ballot and worked on together and that our voters support it. So we are doing something about it. |
02:55:43.41 | Cox | Thank you. |
02:55:43.45 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
02:55:43.46 | Cox | Thank you. |
02:55:43.50 | Kellerman | I did. |
02:55:43.65 | Cox | . |
02:55:43.68 | Kellerman | . |
02:55:43.70 | Cox | Thank you. |
02:55:43.89 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
02:55:44.36 | Kellerman | Nice. |
02:56:23.31 | Unknown | Councilmember Hoffman. |
02:56:24.62 | Councilman Hoffman | So I'm, um, |
02:56:28.45 | Councilman Hoffman | I'm hesitant to |
02:56:32.15 | Councilman Hoffman | talk about emotion with all this |
02:56:34.63 | Councilman Hoffman | incredible amount of new information that we received tonight. |
02:56:38.48 | Councilman Hoffman | you know we've talked about this in the past |
02:56:40.81 | Councilman Hoffman | But. |
02:56:42.02 | Councilman Hoffman | A lot of this information we received tonight |
02:56:44.77 | Councilman Hoffman | that was even updated at 5.30 |
02:56:46.96 | Councilman Hoffman | we haven't received before. |
02:56:48.53 | Councilman Hoffman | And the budget |
02:56:50.24 | Councilman Hoffman | The budget discussion has been on our calendar for years. |
02:56:53.87 | Councilman Hoffman | four weeks so maybe even four meetings so |
02:56:58.29 | Councilman Hoffman | you know |
02:56:59.18 | Councilman Hoffman | The fact that we're here now, we've received some really significant information tonight, still some of it's still in flux. I'm hesitant. |
02:57:09.59 | Councilman Hoffman | when we set a special finance meeting for next week. |
02:57:13.15 | Councilman Hoffman | So my understanding was the finance meeting for next week was to do |
02:57:16.99 | Councilman Hoffman | the deep dive into all of these issues that we've talked about and raised today. |
02:57:22.23 | Councilman Hoffman | But there's additional information that I think is relevant, primarily |
02:57:26.67 | Councilman Hoffman | That's right. |
02:57:27.30 | Unknown | I don't mean to interrupt, but I just want to clarify that. My motion is giving direction for the adoption of the budget at that meeting. We're still not adopting the budget tonight. This is direction as per the recommended motion to adopt that budget with this direction. |
02:57:34.32 | Councilman Hoffman | Oh, wait a minute. |
02:57:35.01 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:57:35.02 | Councilman Hoffman | you know? |
02:57:37.13 | Councilman Hoffman | . |
02:57:38.36 | Unknown | Thank you. |
02:57:38.38 | Councilman Hoffman | as per the recommendation. |
02:57:39.77 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay. |
02:57:41.40 | Councilman Hoffman | with this direction. Sorry. |
02:57:45.15 | Councilman Hoffman | Sorry, okay, forget what I said. Because I misheard you. Yeah, no, thank you for interrupting me. Okay. |
02:57:54.30 | Councilman Hoffman | So with regard for our discussion for next weekend, |
02:57:58.01 | Councilman Hoffman | I would like to have the... |
02:58:00.44 | Councilman Hoffman | the priorities that the city manager sent |
02:58:03.83 | Councilman Hoffman | out in either the email or the email to all of us, but certainly in the email to me on June 4th as priorities for discussion. Yeah, to all of us. And that be included as a discussion item as we work through our budget. The next thing, you know, I want to be clear that we don't have 7.5 million unassigned. We now have, I think, I talked to Chad earlier, with the new reserve, we have between $5 and $6 million, I think. So when you talk about, now we're talking about a deficit spend, that's about $1 million deficit spend, so that's out. |
02:58:04.62 | Katie Thau Garcia | that |
02:58:41.83 | Councilman Hoffman | of the reserve, right? So now we're down to about 4 million. |
02:58:47.03 | Councilman Hoffman | Yeah. |
02:58:47.98 | Councilman Hoffman | Well, out of the unassigned, right. |
02:58:49.51 | Councilman Hoffman | out of the unassigned balance. So we upped the reserve to 25%. |
02:58:56.28 | Councilman Hoffman | And that's in one of the slides that Chad gave us. |
02:59:00.56 | Councilman Hoffman | When we're looking at our increased risk, |
02:59:03.60 | Councilman Hoffman | with a $500,000 |
02:59:06.13 | Councilman Hoffman | basically SIR, a $500,000 ceiling. |
02:59:09.62 | Councilman Hoffman | and our what we're allocating as I guess an inner some sort of reserve of $750,000 to sort of address that I think that's wildly inadequate. |
02:59:21.13 | Councilman Hoffman | And I think we need to look at the 10-year history that was provided. |
02:59:24.83 | Councilman Hoffman | previously and look at the average per year of claims. And that's gonna get us closer to what we should have for |
02:59:34.19 | Councilman Hoffman | a reserve with regard just to our to stabilize |
02:59:38.30 | Councilman Hoffman | our finances and decrease the risk due to the new |
02:59:41.92 | Councilman Hoffman | wildly higher |
02:59:44.05 | Councilman Hoffman | insurance costs that we're going to have. Also, the litigation costs that we know are coming, because we used to have most of those covered, because our previous limit was $50,000. So |
02:59:59.52 | Councilman Hoffman | I think those two things together, I think are going to get us |
03:00:07.02 | Councilman Hoffman | you know, pretty close to a low remaining unassigned reserve. And I want to be cautious about that for our discussion this week. So I look forward to that further discussion. |
03:00:17.34 | Unknown | All right, motions on the table. So I'm going to call the question. |
03:00:19.93 | Councilman Hoffman | I'll see you next time. |
03:00:20.35 | Councilman Hoffman | I'm sorry. |
03:00:20.97 | Unknown | Did I miss you? I am so sorry. I had a little bit of- It's a vigorous discussion. Please go right ahead, Vice Mayor, my apologies. |
03:00:21.46 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you. |
03:00:21.48 | Cox | Yes. I am so sorry. I'm so sorry. |
03:00:23.25 | Cox | It's a little dance. |
03:00:24.58 | Cox | Please go right in. |
03:00:26.29 | Cox | Um, |
03:00:27.27 | Cox | I want to correct something I said earlier. I said $7 million per year. We committed $7 million at the rate of $750,000 per year for the sewer. So I want to correct my misstatement. We certainly can't afford $7 million a year on our sewers. |
03:00:42.81 | Cox | and I wanted to address the... |
03:00:42.88 | Kathy Nikitas | Thank you. |
03:00:43.01 | Kathy Nikitas | Uh-huh. |
03:00:52.93 | Cox | fast moving target. And it's not because staff has been late or dilatory in its efforts. So we scheduled the special meeting that's occurring a week from today |
03:01:06.72 | Cox | Three weeks ago. |
03:01:08.12 | Cox | because we knew that we wouldn't receive the information from PRISM until last week. |
03:01:13.91 | Cox | And so I actually want to commend |
03:01:16.42 | Cox | Um, |
03:01:17.49 | Cox | our city manager, Chad Hess, and the rest of our staff |
03:01:21.39 | Cox | our city attorney for actually putting together the facts and figures and projections |
03:01:26.68 | Cox | just in the last week that they've been able to do as we're continuing to get information from PRISM on a daily basis. |
03:01:34.78 | Cox | no criticism to staff we specifically scheduled the special meeting next Tuesday because we knew we wouldn't receive all of the information we needed in order to finalize our budget until and that that's why we needed that special meeting so I just wanted to make that clear this is planned it's still somewhat frenzied but it's a planned frenzy and I think we're on track in terms of the plan that we |
03:02:00.53 | Cox | made to address this moving target. |
03:02:04.03 | Cox | That's the only... |
03:02:04.70 | Unknown | What? |
03:02:05.02 | Unknown | additional question is called I want all in favor okay say aye |
03:02:06.51 | Cox | COMMENT. |
03:02:09.93 | Unknown | Aye. Opposed? All right. Motion carries. We will now move on to item five. |
03:02:16.15 | Unknown | Can I ask one point of clarification? Yes, sir. |
03:02:20.03 | Unknown | I do need direction. |
03:02:21.70 | Unknown | and |
03:02:22.93 | Unknown | using a workman's comp plan. |
03:02:25.12 | Unknown | I know. |
03:02:25.21 | Unknown | We were directing your recommendation. |
03:02:27.52 | Unknown | Okay, I would like to go with |
03:02:30.49 | Unknown | Let me just share my screen just to make sure we're all in the same place. |
03:02:32.46 | Cox | and not SCIF. |
03:02:34.54 | Unknown | I would like to go with Prism. |
03:02:36.17 | Cox | I would like to |
03:02:37.00 | Cox | That's a good recommendation, yeah. |
03:02:39.15 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:02:39.16 | Unknown | Thank you. Thank you. That's your renewal and sustainability program update. Ms. Katie Garcia, welcome. Great to see you. |
03:02:40.29 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:02:50.94 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:02:51.13 | Councilman McCullough | Thank you. |
03:02:56.02 | Katie Thau Garcia | Katie Thau- Alright good evening mayor council members and members of the public i'm katie thau Garcia the city's resiliency and sustainability manager. Katie Thau- As we just discussed, the city of Sausalito has deeper infrastructure needs and sustainability goals than the current budget can accommodate. |
03:03:15.34 | Katie Thau Garcia | City management and staff have been challenged to source and implement alternative solutions, including funding that will support the city's effort to proactively renew infrastructure, promote sustainability, and provide budgetary relief in a back-to-basics approach while incorporating smart cities technology. |
03:03:35.96 | Katie Thau Garcia | In response to this, on September 5th, 2023, Council authorized the release of requests for proposals for the Infrastructure Modernization, Utility Savings, and Sustainability Program. |
03:03:49.40 | Katie Thau Garcia | The RFP sought qualifications and proposals from qualified design-build firms capable of providing comprehensive energy conservation measures, according to Government Code 4217. |
03:04:02.64 | Katie Thau Garcia | Through the process, Climatech was selected and approved by Council on December 19, 2023. |
03:04:09.06 | Katie Thau Garcia | Climatech has worked successfully with cities such as San Leandro, Clayton, Beverly Hills, Ontario, and Santa Clarita, and many more. |
03:04:19.10 | Katie Thau Garcia | Since council approval in December, Climatech has been very busy working with every city department to craft an initial phase of the Comprehensive Infrastructure Renewal and Sustainability Program, which will save the city money through energy conservation measures while helping the city update existing infrastructure. |
03:04:41.79 | Katie Thau Garcia | Climatech is here tonight to share this update, and on Thursday they will present to the Sustainability Commission. I will turn it over to Tyler Gertman and Bern Carter to share their preliminary assessment that they have developed today in collaboration with the city. Thank you. |
03:05:02.85 | Tyler Gerben | All right, good evening. Good evening, Mayor Sobieski, Vice Mayor Cox, and council members, staff, and community. Appreciate your patience and ability to look through what the city could actually accomplish with savings, additional revenue, and really take care of the immediate deferred maintenance within the city. |
03:05:21.82 | Tyler Gerben | My name is Tyler Gerben, regional manager for Climate Tech, and with me, Bern Carter, as well. We've been working with a slew of your city staff to help and collaborate and put this together. |
03:05:32.01 | Tyler Gerben | Next slide. |
03:05:34.76 | Tyler Gerben | So when we first started and we were selected from the RFP, we were given objectives to really help |
03:05:39.81 | Tyler Gerben | move the city along. The first major objective was to look at going back to the basics and improve |
03:05:46.95 | Tyler Gerben | infrastructure, take care of deferred maintenance. 10, 15 years ago, the city had a focus on fire, police, four or five years ago, more on the parks. And now looking at more of building infrastructure and really getting back to the deferred maintenance elements there and by taking care |
03:06:04.57 | Tyler Gerben | of those deferred maintenance elements as well, looking at hedging against utility escalations with utilities on the rise, even at what Chad mentioned in the previous presentation, as well as hedging against market volatility. So each year that. |
03:06:18.33 | Tyler Gerben | cities kick the can on certain projects, to Mayor Sobieski's point before, you know, projects are going up 10, 15% year over year. And that's a risk, that's a financial risk and liability to the city. So one of the objectives was to hedge against that as much as possible. Also to the sustainability efforts and to expedite the greenhouse gas reductions and climate action plan of the city, and then enhance smart city initiatives. So not only taking care of deferred maintenance, but also looking at 21st century technology to enhance and |
03:06:50.48 | Tyler Gerben | technology for staff to be more efficient, but also increase revenue and look at energy savings all at the same time. |
03:06:56.51 | Tyler Gerben | So those were the four main objectives that we were given as we were looking at this project. |
03:07:01.53 | Tyler Gerben | Next slide. |
03:07:02.77 | Tyler Gerben | So the process to date, I'll go quickly through this. We've accomplished quite a bit with the team. Competitive selection process is done, as Katie mentioned. Legal, Sergio and the team looked at the agreement, which the city council approved, which began our first phase of looking at the energy and water assessment throughout your city. And that started with the utility baseline development. We looked at your water use, your gas use, and your electric use across all your sites, parks, and buildings. And then from there, we went out and assessed your infrastructure in terms of the energy and water consuming systems. So engineering site assessments. So that took about two, two and a half weeks. And we even came back with Ali and Kevin and spent some more time investigating certain other measures as well. So a lot of time invested there. And really, it's been a collaborative process along the way, not only speaking with Chad, but also Wayne in parking to Pat and facilities, Kevin Ali, obviously, Katie as well to really bring together a collaborative initiative across all departments on what does this look like? What are the priorities? What are the deferred maintenance elements that need to be achieved? And then what are the technologies that the city needs to really advance itself? And through those conversations, we've really narrowed it down. And we're here to discuss that preliminary assessment and get further direction from you as we further, you know, get into the detailed assessment as the next step. In addition, we've met with Mark and Kimmery from the Sustainability Commission, and they've invited us to present on Thursday, so we'll be sharing this information with them and obtaining additional feedback from them, and obviously tonight, the council informational item. |
03:08:35.53 | Tyler Gerben | When you start these projects, especially when you consider California government code 4217, you look at the expenditures of the city in terms of its utilities, water, electric, and gas, which is the main chart on the left-hand side. In the middle, which I'll come back to, is the energy used by site. And on the right, it's the total annual utility spend that the city spends just on utilities, not on operating, not on maintenance, which is an additional expenditure above and beyond this number. |
03:09:00.72 | Tyler Gerben | $442,000 is spent on an annual basis, and escalations are occurring year over year on these numbers. If you look at the middle, I want to bring your attention to the middle chart, middle pie chart there. When you look at the top three, you have City Hall, you have MLK, streetlights are 17% of your overall energy use. However, they're all LEDs already. So you want to take a look at the fourth, which is your police station. And that's going to come to fruition as we go along in this presentation. But that's where the low hanging fruit is, is to see savings in those three areas. And just the fact of cost of doing nothing, keeping status quo, the city would pay at a nominal 5% increase year over year, $31 million in utilities if it kept status quo. So that's a lot of money. And as you look at it, you want to take the biggest bite out of that as you can, as you're moving along with your CIP projects, your facility projects, and even projects like this. |
03:09:59.60 | Tyler Gerben | So the sites assessed, every single site listed here, we assessed at different systems, irrigation controls, HVAC, we'll talk about those more specifically, but we looked at all those and the highlighted ones represent what was really discussed with staff and collaborated with on an initial phase to focus on as well. But we did look at all these sites that are covered here on the slide. Next picture, please. |
03:10:26.08 | Tyler Gerben | And then for those sites, what were the systems that we assessed, right? So we assessed the heating, cooling, city hall windows, and the list goes on in terms of these are the systems that consume the heating or the gas, the electric, and the water in addition. And in concert with knowing what systems we assessed, we worked with Ali, we worked with Kevin in terms of their RFP that's on the street for the facility conditions assessment. We will be providing information so that there's no duplication of efforts, a part of that RFP, and providing this information to them once it's finally put together. But overall, when you take a look at all these different measures, it's roughly around $11 million, not just of deferred maintenance need, but sustainability initiatives, resilience, etc. So it's about $11 million for all the different measures here that we assess in a budget preliminary manner. |
03:11:19.25 | Tyler Gerben | When speaking with staff, we also had to take into account what are the priorities, like Gene Hill or HVAC failing and getting that replaced. We had to look at various different things that they brought to the table. We also had to look at California Government Code 4217, which is the procurement of this project, which says that the savings has to exceed the overall project price. And so that's why you see this bundle of potential initial phase projects. They're also the lowest hanging fruit and they're focused on your top three energy using buildings as well to save as much money there. And we'll talk about the smart city parking as well, but also enhancing revenue for the city through smart, smart city technology as well. |
03:12:00.95 | Tyler Gerben | Next slide. |
03:12:02.64 | Tyler Gerben | Talk about the lighting first, because we're going to touch on each one of those. City has roughly 1700 fixtures. The city has done a good job of upgrading streetlights to LED and some various other lights. Part of the program would be proposed to... |
03:12:17.32 | Tyler Gerben | enhanced 762 fixtures to LED lighting technology, the remaining streetlights, 75 remaining streetlights, as well as the other building facilities, enhancing safety, security, but also lowering your overall utility spends. So finishing that up, 762 fixtures of LED lighting modernization. |
03:12:36.47 | Tyler Gerben | Next slide. |
03:12:38.24 | Tyler Gerben | Heating and cooling systems, I mentioned Gene Hiller, that system has been down. |
03:12:41.60 | Tyler Gerben | and replacing that system. |
03:12:43.19 | Tyler Gerben | and the HVAC, that system was installed in 1993. |
03:12:47.62 | Tyler Gerben | It's 31 years old. The average useful life of HVAC is 15 years old. And even the systems here at City Hall as well. So you'd start taking a look at age and replacing the oldest systems, which obviously Gene Hiller has failed and needs to be replaced. And it's one of the priority items that we would address as part of this program. |
03:13:07.32 | Tyler Gerben | In addition to that, it's about how you control your heating and cooling as well. Building automation, not only standardized for your staff so that they can see it remotely and control various different events, but also improve comfort and make sure systems aren't running when they don't need to run. And one of the key recommendations here, too, is electrifying the heating and cooling systems here at City Hall. This would not only include heating, but also air conditioning with very high-efficient systems these days. So getting rid of the furnaces here getting rid of the boy the steam boiler getting rid of gas throughout the entire city hall and electrifying it is a recommendation within this program as well. Next slide. |
03:13:45.88 | Tyler Gerben | I saw you cheering over there. |
03:13:48.19 | Tyler Gerben | And then looking at City Hall windows, some of the windows are just stuck open, not able to close. They're single panes, so very inefficient. But they also have a great aesthetic appeal and the historic preservation or the want to keep that preservation here of this facility. But in looking at all of those different needs here at City Hall, looking to upgrade the windows to dual pane, not only energy efficient, but also keep the aesthetic appeal. You can customize the paint color. You're going to keep the grid perspective of the new windows so that it wouldn't obviously change the look of the building, which is obviously what we heard is very important to the city. So keeping that same look, customizing the colors to really match what the windows and the building looks like now. |
03:14:33.80 | Tyler Gerben | Next. |
03:14:35.07 | Tyler Gerben | Also, one thing to mention, to improve security as well with the windows is huge, especially as you look at taking on leases with computers and other elements as well. It's really important closing those windows and making sure that they're secure. It's an added security element too. |
03:14:49.17 | Tyler Gerben | So the smart city and smart parking, this is two different elements that we've been talking about with the city. |
03:14:54.03 | Tyler Gerben | The first is the foundational communication network, which will actually go throughout downtown. There's communication issues with existing systems. This would actually patch those and have the ability for technologies to overlay this type of smart city technology. And in the future, the city could do public Wi-Fi. They could do, obviously, the parking, which we'll talk about, GHG monitoring and other elements, gunshot detection, noise detection, different technologies that can be bolted onto this smart city system as you move forward. |
03:15:25.15 | Tyler Gerben | with us. And that's, it's a similar process that other cities like San Leandro and Ontario and La Mirada have done is that they've actually implemented more of a foundational communication network and then added these types of amenities on top of it. And one of them is a smart parking amenity as well to enhance, obviously the revenue to put it in a parking lot five, which currently doesn't have any pay station or any ability to pay |
03:15:49.60 | Tyler Gerben | So enhancing revenue there. |
03:15:51.26 | Tyler Gerben | and then also replacing a lot of the coin-operated systems throughout the city and modernizing it to the latest technology to enhance revenue for the city. And parking lots one through five are looking at getting the enhanced parking system as well, which again will improve even just compliance as well with these systems. |
03:16:12.54 | Tyler Gerben | Next slide, please. |
03:16:14.92 | Tyler Gerben | These are just some sample solar structures that have been completed at other cities and public entities that I just wanted to show what that typically looks like. |
03:16:22.31 | Tyler Gerben | Next slide, please. |
03:16:24.99 | Tyler Gerben | So starting off back to the baseline chart, one, two, three, the energy intensity, sorry, of each site and trying to tackle those. You look at the solar PV here at City Hall. The city has an existing system |
03:16:40.31 | Tyler Gerben | on there right now. It's 15 years old. It's at the end of its term per the contract with Tesla. And the city has the ability to look at removing it or keeping it. We've done the analysis on the system itself. It's actually 20% inefficient. So it's running 20% less than what it should be at today's date with that technology. So it's an inefficient system. And it's basically got five, possibly even 10 years left in it as well. So the recommendation would be to look at having the company remove the system, because per contract they would have to remove the system, and install far superior technology, obviously 15 years later, and create the first net zero energy site for the city of Sausalito, not only financially a good thing for the city, but at the same time, leading the effort and sustainability as well. It would only need a nominal shade structure in the parking lot and no trees would need to be removed. No trees would need to be removed. And also one thing I wanted to point out is the reason why this is able to be net zero energy is the fact that the panels on the roof are 205 watt, and now they're going to be going up to 500 watts. So it actually produces more per square foot, which is really the far superior technology this day and time. So next slide, please. |
03:18:04.10 | Tyler Gerben | Looking at the number two energy use site, MLK, you see the three different rooftop systems here. This is because of the three different meters and the new NEM metering rules. But this would be the proposed rooftop structures at MLK. Next slide. |
03:18:23.69 | Tyler Gerben | And then obviously police has limited space on the roof, but this would offset about 50% of its overall load. And this is the number three energy use CIDR system as well. So putting solar on each one of these roofs to really curb the utility spend and expenditures. Next slide. |
03:18:42.88 | Tyler Gerben | EV charging. So the city has moved forward with two EV systems at City Hall and at Dunphy Park. |
03:18:50.98 | Tyler Gerben | This would fill in the rest of the sites, at least that was covered within phase one and add the police department. This would be a level three charger, depending on the car. This would be for public use as well. It could charge a Tesla in about an hour. So really one of the top end level three chargers. And that would be owned by the city. And obviously the revenue would be gained by the city with that as well. Next slide, please. |
03:19:16.69 | Tyler Gerben | Three level two chargers and with the mandate from CARB to modernized fleets, it's very important to look at future purchases and investing in EV infrastructure here with level two chargers at City Hall. You have enough capacity at both of those areas for these systems on electrical, from an electrical perspective. Next slide. |
03:19:38.75 | Tyler Gerben | So all in all, this is about 50% of the deferred maintenance and sustainability improvements that we've identified in terms of a priority first phase, low-hanging fruit that would drive savings, help procure with 4217, and drive, and we feel this is fairly conservative, but $7.5 million over the life of the program. And obviously enhanced revenues, working with the R on projections there for say for the parking. We feel that's very conservative and that could even go up higher as well. But about 7.5 million saved over the life of the program. And then various different funding sources, like we talked about at the beginning of this process, four to five different funding sources typically come together to make this program come to fruition. The Inflation Reduction Act, which is a grant from the federal government, |
03:20:29.49 | Tyler Gerben | the city would be eligible for that. EV grants. |
03:20:32.50 | Tyler Gerben | private sector financing, or depending on city capital or reserves. |
03:20:36.38 | Tyler Gerben | PG&E on bill financing, which is 0% financing from PG&E, very limited dollar amount here, because of the restrictions of that program, and then any other utility incentives. So really about a lot of different funding sources coming to the table, including some good grant dollars. |
03:20:52.63 | Tyler Gerben | Next slide. |
03:20:54.64 | Tyler Gerben | The Inflation Reduction Act is a new federal program that came from, obviously, the Biden administration and allows for |
03:21:02.01 | Tyler Gerben | public entities to actually obtain these grant dollars directly after you implement the renewable energy. And so we estimate north of $400,000 in terms of grant money that would come back to the city for implementing the renewable energy portion of this program here that we're presenting today. |
03:21:20.96 | Tyler Gerben | Next slide. |
03:21:23.10 | Tyler Gerben | The annual sustainability benefits. So just with the low hanging fruit program that we've collaborated with staff on today, this would accomplish about 80% of the greenhouse gas emissions that the city, you know, basically utilizes on an annual basis. So really taking a big chunk from the sustainability perspective for the city of Sausalito. Next slide. |
03:21:48.11 | Tyler Gerben | And this is a good wheel chart just to show what are the different benefits of this program, not only taking care of $5.7 million with the deferred maintenance and sustainability initiatives, but hedging against utility escalations, market volatility. Because once we are in contract with the city, which would happen at a future Sausalito council meeting, if obviously the program met your expectations, we would be held at a fixed price for labor, equipment, et cetera. So it's hedging against that as the construction's moving forward. And then obviously, a multitude of other benefits, including improving staff and operational efficiency with the new technology as well. |
03:22:25.85 | Tyler Gerben | Next slide. |
03:22:28.23 | Tyler Gerben | Climate Tech Community Connect program. So along these programs, examples of what we've done at San Leandro in Ontario, but coming alongside Sausalito and really sharing your story. A lot of these projects aren't necessarily like solar. They're not in front of the community. And it's about sharing what you're doing to invest in your infrastructure, save money, produce revenue, and obviously save the environment. And we come alongside you, help tell that story as well. And these are just some examples of websites that we've done for other cities. |
03:22:57.03 | Tyler Gerben | And then next steps. So obviously obtaining your feedback here tonight, answering any questions, and then proceed forward with doing a detailed engineering assessment of these selected elements. And then proceeding forward with obviously the June 20th presentation to the Sustainability Commission, and then potential council consideration September, October. And then there would be an implementation shortly thereafter as well. Thank you. |
03:23:22.12 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:23:22.29 | Tyler Gerben | I have questions. |
03:23:23.12 | Unknown | Please, for this gentleman. |
03:23:26.44 | Unknown | Councilman McCullough. |
03:23:27.15 | Councilman McCullough | Thank you. |
03:23:27.31 | Kellerman | Yes, thank you very much. Near and dear to my heart. So very much appreciate it. And thank you to Councilman Blaustein, who I think brought this forward when she was the mayor. So one of the things that you glossed over just a little bit is funding. And you have a slide on it, but I really want to drill down on grants. So Department of Transportation, EPA, DOE, all have significant grant monies, probably slightly more applicable on a per project basis to a lot of these things. Even at the state level, there's weatherization monies coming from the California Department of Community and Development. |
03:24:02.47 | Kellerman | Is that a part of your project plan to be able to help us apply for grants in each of those different categories? I don't wanna leave this to the Inflation Reduction Act, |
03:24:11.47 | Kellerman | Because a lot of those monies are going towards workforce readiness and job training, and it's harder for communities of our socioeconomic status to really qualify for that. I'd rather see this grant pursued on a per-project basis based on the energy efficiency, this is going to be an HVAC system, this is going to be something that the Department of Transportation would want. Is that a part of what you guys do? |
03:24:32.58 | Tyler Gerben | We look at the funding on a holistic perspective. The Inflation Reduction Act is going to provide quite a bit of money for renewable energy and this type of project. And you do qualify for it, and you will get the money for it once you install the solar. So that money is more solidified. The other monies like USDOE is actually smaller and far more competitive on a national scale. And so we're seeing very low rates of success, especially with non-DAC elements within the application for grants. When you look at that, we are looking at MCE and and CEC grants for EV, which is already a part of this program. And all depending on to if the city wants to move forward with purchasing a heavy duty electrical vehicle that really boost a lot of the grant dollars as well, because that's a big push from the state of California. So we do look at a lot of grant dollars in terms of it. And is it even feasible to obtain those dollars? But a lot of it would come from other sources of funding, but a lot, you know, there is a good portion of grants mixed in here at this point in time. |
03:25:33.99 | Karen Hollweg | Karen Hollweg, And we do assist the city with those applications yeah to your question directly absolutely. |
03:25:36.65 | Kellerman | Yeah. |
03:25:36.92 | Tyler Gerben | Thank you. |
03:25:38.86 | Tyler Gerben | Thank you. |
03:25:38.88 | Kellerman | Okay, so when you come back to us, I would like a little bit of a rabbit hole on how exactly you assist us with those. Because those monies are out there and we haven't been very successful in obtaining them. This is also a council, as you saw, that really enjoys budgeting conversations. And so we pay very close attention and I want to make sure that we get to component number four of your arrow, which I don't think we'll get to unless those monies are actually identified. Agreed. |
03:26:01.61 | Tyler Gerben | I agree. |
03:26:02.67 | Tyler Gerben | And we want to definitely finalize that with Director Hess, City Manager Zapata, and the council as well in terms of how can this funding come together and then the savings that can be achieved from doing a program like this as well. And what does that look like? So we'll be finalizing that. |
03:26:17.24 | Kellerman | Okay. Yeah. And I would just urge you to focus more on the upfront funds for installation, planning and maintenance over the cost savings ROI that you want us to articulate in the budget. Because we just, as you saw, don't have the excess cash to actually install the panels, even though there's a lot of the lease agreements that are out there. |
03:26:32.69 | Tyler Gerben | One key component to the upfront capital that's there right now and what other cities are doing is whether it's capital reserves, you have the ability to make that decision, but there's also third party funding, even from like a bank of Marin or a bank of America at four, four and a half percent. And they do these niche programs where the savings would actually |
03:26:50.40 | Tyler Gerben | pay for that type of lease payment to get the project done at today's dollar. And so those are some of the options that are being considered because like with the IRA, that's a reimbursed grant. And so the upfront money to be able to do that and then bring the grant behind it once it's implemented is important. So I agree with you on the upfront, and we're looking at all those different options. |
03:27:03.31 | Kevin McGowan | And so, |
03:27:03.54 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
03:27:09.82 | Kellerman | to |
03:27:12.43 | Kellerman | Yeah, and you know, MCE is pursuing a lot of virtual power plant type scenarios. It's a really good opportunity. I'm on the board, and so we were talking about generation, and the board didn't have appetite for it, but virtual power plants are very interesting for offsetting grid load, so ways to spin that in the ecosystem are of interest. |
03:27:29.68 | Kellerman | OK. |
03:27:32.31 | Unknown | Councilor Vice Mayor. |
03:27:34.34 | Cox | I just wanted to follow up a little bit on the IRA funds. So my understanding is that in California, a lot of those funds come through the county and not directly to local agencies. |
03:27:46.18 | Tyler Gerben | Good question. The Inflation Reduction Act, actually one of the key components of the IRA is that it modified for years when you implemented renewable energy, just like you did with the PPA, with the solar on the roof. That entity got that tax credit itself. What it modified is now what is called the direct pay rate. |
03:28:05.17 | Unknown | Yep. |
03:28:05.47 | Tyler Gerben | And so it allows for public entities to actually obtain those dollars directly, not going through the county, not going through the state, directly from the Treasury once the system is implemented and then applied for afterwards. And so that change has really shifted, you know, focus on obviously implementing renewable energy, which is a big push, obviously, from Biden and the administration. But those monies don't flow through the state and down through the county. At least this portion that we're talking about, it's a direct pay directly to you as a public entity. And that rule change occurred within the last two years. |
03:28:36.67 | Cox | THOSE PEOPLE. |
03:28:37.03 | Tyler Gerben | types of projects. Or specific projects like this. |
03:28:38.16 | Cox | specific projects like this. Not for all infrastructure projects. Correct. |
03:28:40.05 | Tyler Gerben | Correct. Not all infrastructure projects for renewable energy, for EV, which sadly Sausalito doesn't qualify for the EV benefit. Right. And for battery storage, which is obviously still expensive and doesn't fiscally make sense at this point in time. But that's why the solar PV would get the credit of the IRA. Thanks. Any other questions before public comment? |
03:28:41.96 | Cox | . |
03:28:42.26 | Cox | Blen. |
03:28:58.41 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:28:58.68 | Tyler Gerben | you |
03:28:58.86 | Unknown | because |
03:28:59.07 | Blaustein | Go ahead, Councilman Hoffman. |
03:28:59.18 | Unknown | Yeah. |
03:29:00.03 | Councilman Hoffman | after. |
03:29:00.25 | Blaustein | you. |
03:29:03.59 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you for the presentation and thank you for all your hard work on this. It's clearly done a nice job of doing an inventory of what we need. |
03:29:13.56 | Councilman Hoffman | Is it possible for when you come back to itemize many of these things and segregate by building? Because we do have business enterprise funds for buildings that are revenue-generating, positive revenue-generating buildings for maintenance and things, you know, specific to that revenue-generating asset, such as MLK. We have a fund for that. We have a fund for Gene Heller. I'm trying to think of, I don't think we have a fund for City Hall. We're not, you know, so, but anyway, for those, and also with regard to our capital improvement plan and the plan that Public Works comes up with. And so is it possible to marry that itemized list to the capital improvement plan and the plan that Public Works comes up with. And so is it possible to marry that itemized list to the capital improvement projects that we've already looked at or addressed with regard to what Public Works is going to be working on? |
03:29:19.17 | Katie Thau Garcia | and segregation. |
03:30:12.68 | Tyler Gerben | That can be part of the overall facility conditions assessment, the information that we provide and even the numbers. And yeah, that can be part of that overall arching assessment. |
03:30:20.88 | Tyler Gerben | Thank you. |
03:30:20.94 | Councilman Hoffman | So that would be, I think that's what you're asking. Yeah. That would be helpful. And like columns, you know, like across the column, here's how it's going to cost. There's a funny source. How's it fit in our capital improvement project? And that's good. |
03:30:22.67 | Tyler Gerben | Yeah, that would help for us. |
03:30:31.51 | Tyler Gerben | That's a good question. And the next step in the process is to get that detailed breakout. As long as we're going down the right direction of looking at this type of infrastructure, you'll see it in the savings, lifecycle savings will be broken down as well as the price. Very transparent in terms of this process. |
03:30:45.95 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
03:30:45.97 | Councilman Hoffman | That'd be great. |
03:30:46.51 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
03:30:46.53 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you. |
03:30:47.14 | Tyler Gerben | Thank you. |
03:30:48.70 | Blaustein | Hi, guys. Thank you. Nice to see you again. Really appreciate this comprehensive audit and consideration. I just was wondering, given that this is this council's first time seeing this type of audit, could you just a little bit speak to what you might have done for a neighboring community so that we can have a real world application of what comes next? |
03:31:05.58 | Tyler Gerben | Yeah. |
03:31:08.19 | Tyler Gerben | Yeah, yeah, yeah. For example, we could, you know, city of Clayton's moving forward with the implementation right now, small program, about $2 million that we were able to obtain funding. None of no capital was used. It's third party funding, but they were able to invest about $2 million in EV for their police, solar PV and go net zero energy at their city hall, water irrigation, HVAC building automation, and a slew of other improvements as well. More closer to you, City of San Leandro, over four phases of projects, not only starting off with their main low-hanging fruit, similar to what you're considering in terms of HVAC and building modernization, but they also implemented the Smart City package as well and really did a foundational communication network. That was about $23.1 million that they were able to invest in their infrastructure. And they only spent $3 million in capital as part of this program. That was over 10 years and four phases of bundled projects. But their first phase was very similar to what you're considering here in terms of Sausalito as well. |
03:32:11.32 | Blaustein | And on the battery storage and microgrid piece, I serve on the county's basically a task force on microgrids, and we had actually unsuccessfully applied for a grant for the city hall to be, I think we spoke with you about this, for the city hall to be an emergency response center with microgrids. Is there additional funding that you can look for specifically for us around microgrids for disaster preparedness or for conservation? |
03:32:36.32 | Tyler Gerben | Very good question. So let me go back to the example of San Leandro. So San Leandro, we started the first phase project. It was about five and a half million dollars worth of projects of really critical need. And a grant became available. We helped them apply for it and helped them get that money. So the answer is yes. When there is monies available and when that comes about, that could be an amendment, a second phase. We look at those types of things. We share that with you. We can help you submit applications for that and hopefully be more successful with that in the future. |
03:33:08.28 | Blaustein | And then the last question is just about the smart city measures. I mean, this is something that I'm very passionate about. We've talked about this quite a bit. Is this a long game goal for us, or do you see it as something that could be applicable in the first or second round of implementations? |
03:33:22.22 | Tyler Gerben | It's now in terms of the implementation, and that's what's going to really move the smart parking element and the increased revenue on that side as well. Having the foundational communication network is imperative, and then you can bolt on the smart parking and the other elements. I could even add additional revenue in the near future. It's a long-term play as a vision, but it's a short-term reality. |
03:33:45.11 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
03:33:45.33 | Blaustein | Thank you very much. |
03:33:46.74 | Tyler Gerben | Okay, so let's open public |
03:33:48.03 | Unknown | comment please. |
03:33:50.19 | Mayor Sobieski | See you click, Babette McDougall. |
03:33:53.65 | Unknown | Ms. McDougal. |
03:34:03.61 | McDougall | Well, that was a very detailed and authoritative presentation. |
03:34:09.55 | McDougall | I'm just kind of wondering where we are on a couple of things. So I just want to get back to this idea of what is feasible for Sausalito and |
03:34:20.03 | McDougall | versus, you know, boilerplate for someplace else where it may or may not be relevant. And oftentimes there's lessons to be had. So where are we in doing this with our own sustainability team? Are these guys consultants that come from the outside and do the work for us? I'm a little confused. Are they part of the staff? |
03:34:41.31 | McDougall | So I know we just spent a lot of money on Councilmember Kelman's |
03:34:46.52 | McDougall | spearheaded this magnificent effort to really push us out on sustainability, sea level rise, these really important cutting edge things that are already here. |
03:34:57.54 | McDougall | This is all very much a part of that same message. |
03:35:01.31 | McDougall | So they belong together. They should be aggregated into the same thing. |
03:35:06.88 | McDougall | It's all important. Thank you. |
03:35:12.98 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
03:35:13.03 | Unknown | Seeing no further public speakers. All right, we'll close public comment. Any comments here on the dais? |
03:35:18.77 | Mayor Sobieski | Oh, actually, I'm sorry. We did have one person. Oh, no, no. Sorry, wrong one. Yep. Councilmember Coleman or Boston? No, you go first. |
03:35:25.81 | Kellerman | Oh, I just want to ask another. So you probably know that for our EV charging, we worked with actually a local company, Integrative Charging, and that a unique upfront capitalization model so that they own all the infrastructure, basically kind of a lease situation. There are others. There's another member of the community. He has a company called GridVest Partners. I'm sure you know them as well. These companies that try to reduce the upfront capital expenditure. Can you, is that something you guys could include? That type of model where, when appropriate, we have it already with solar panels. The city doesn't actually have to own the infrastructure, but is able to... |
03:36:01.79 | Kellerman | have some type of either leasing your agreement or I can't remember exact terms of integrative charging, but something along those lines. |
03:36:09.11 | Tyler Gerben | Yeah, and if for some reason it's not included in phase one, then the city can elect to do that |
03:36:15.29 | Tyler Gerben | type of program through those means as necessary. EV in itself has very little, low maintenance and you have the ability to actually capture a hundred percent of that revenue as well. Um, so there's some, some think considerations as we walk through this to keep in mind. |
03:36:28.85 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
03:36:28.89 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
03:36:29.04 | Kellerman | you |
03:36:29.11 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
03:36:29.19 | Kellerman | you |
03:36:29.23 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
03:36:29.26 | Kellerman | Yeah. |
03:36:29.38 | Blaustein | I WANT TO TAKE A LOOK AT |
03:36:29.53 | Kellerman | I look forward to the next. |
03:36:29.97 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
03:36:30.59 | Kellerman | Remember posting. |
03:36:31.20 | Tyler Gerben | Thank you. |
03:36:31.28 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
03:36:32.43 | Blaustein | I just want to say I really appreciate the work that you're doing. And I think this is a great example of partnership to find funding for important initiatives. We don't necessarily have to use our, whether we call it excess cash or not, we don't necessarily have to use our existing funds to start solving some of these really critical climate problems and to use new technology and new approaches to move us forward. I think we can be doing a lot more as a city, and I think this is a first step towards that. So I'm really looking forward to working with you and your team to get us to implementation sooner rather than later. And I think Council Member Kellman and I have both been somewhat disappointed in our grants and our funding that we've been able to receive, and it seems like you are a clear pathway for us to do a better job there as well. So really appreciate that and appreciate your time. Thank you. Appreciate it. |
03:37:19.43 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:37:22.60 | Unknown | Any other comments? All right, well, we'll accept the report and thank you very much for your time. Thank you. And the next day we'll now move on to 5C discussion and direction of staff regarding the Marin Ship Blue Economy Innovation District Initiative. Is there a staff report from you, I guess, Director McAllen or no? No? City Clerk, City Manager? |
03:37:39.59 | Councilman Hoffman | City Clerk, City Manager. Sorry, before we start, I have a question. Are we going to continue this item except for public comment, or we're going to actually hear it? |
03:37:48.81 | Unknown | There'll be a vote about that after public comment, is what the city attorney said. |
03:37:51.90 | Councilman Hoffman | Well. |
03:37:53.67 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you. |
03:37:53.68 | Cox | I want to point out that this says that the staff report is to |
03:37:59.05 | Cox | Um, |
03:38:00.38 | Cox | The recommendation, this is not on |
03:38:04.30 | Cox | for action tonight. It's to discuss and provide direction to staff regarding this matter, understanding the required timeframe. |
03:38:13.63 | Unknown | That is the agenda item. Discuss and provide direction to staff regarding this matter. So that is the recommended motion. City Manager, is there a presentation from anyone? |
03:38:24.38 | Councilman Hoffman | Hold on. Sorry. Is it a point of order? It's not a point of order. I don't need to recuse. I'm choosing to recuse. In that case, I have a property within 500 feet, and I believe that the requirement of the FPPC is that if you have a property within 500 feet of an issue that comes before the council, the proper procedure is to recuse until you, there's a presumption that you have a conflict and that you should recuse until you have a written ruling from the FPPC that you have no conflict. So at this point, I'm going to recuse and I'll step back into the council chamber and watch. |
03:39:04.54 | Unknown | Thank you, Councilmember. You are, of course, welcome. |
03:39:05.94 | Kellerman | Councillor Schell, may I ask a question? Does your inquiry into the FPPC prevent you from voting on a motion to continue rolling on a motion that pertains to the substance of the matter? |
03:39:18.02 | Councilman Hoffman | Thank you. |
03:39:18.04 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
03:39:18.46 | Councilman Hoffman | I think if it's a calendaring issue, I can vote on that because that's non-substantive. But with regard to being present while presentations are made, while public comments are being made, I think I need to step out and off the dais. |
03:39:32.71 | Councilman Hoffman | City Attorney. City Attorney. |
03:39:34.83 | Unknown | Yeah, typically if you have to recuse from a business item rather than a consent item, then you announce your recusal, you step off of the dais, and typically you would leave the room. |
03:39:45.85 | Unknown | You're certainly welcome to watch the public comments, but you can't participate in the matter in any in any way. |
03:39:52.00 | Councilman Hoffman | I'm telling you. |
03:39:52.06 | Unknown | I'm telling you, I am. |
03:39:52.58 | Councilman Hoffman | I'll go into the back room and watch on the monitor back there. I'll watch public comment back there. |
03:39:58.44 | Councilman Hoffman | Okay. |
03:40:02.68 | Unknown | Is there a presentation from staff? |
03:40:04.11 | Unknown | city manager. Mayor, if I can just be brief, we got this as an agenda request from, I believe it was Council Member Hoffman two meetings ago, and then it was briefly discussed at the last meeting about hearing it, and so what you have in front of you is the information that was submitted by the attorney for the initiative, Mr. Wolf, and very little staff analysis of it because we haven't been directed to do it, but there is a whole lot of public comment that's been attached to it that, you know, is part of the record at this point. So, you know, I would be hesitant to speak about something that I didn't bring forward or that I haven't had the time to vet or city attorney wants away and he can too. But, you know, we're looking to take direction from you all as to what your pleasure is. We've given you some time frames about what would be required if the city council did choose to place this on the ballot, the timing involved in that. And again, you know, early August is when this will all have to be resolved. But in the meantime, you know, our recommendation would be is to give us direction and us to not provide a report because we're not prepared to do that. |
03:40:33.05 | Katie Thau Garcia | I was just... |
03:41:08.61 | Unknown | All right. Well, I have some questions. You do you know who's written who wrote this initiative? |
03:41:13.53 | Unknown | It came from a gentleman by the name of Mark Wolf from M.R. Wolf and Associates. |
03:41:17.06 | Unknown | Do you know if he wrote it, this attorney? |
03:41:18.67 | Unknown | I do not know that, Mayor. |
03:41:20.20 | Unknown | Do you know if this initiative has been aired at the Economic Development Advisory Committee? |
03:41:26.38 | Unknown | I don't believe so. |
03:41:27.37 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:41:27.91 | Unknown | Has it been a has it been aired at any city commission? |
03:41:32.55 | Unknown | To your knowledge? |
03:41:33.90 | Unknown | No, sir. |
03:41:36.75 | Unknown | So we don't know where it came from, except for Mr. Walden. |
03:41:38.38 | Unknown | I understand. |
03:41:40.40 | Unknown | Let me be factual. So Mayor, it came- |
03:41:44.97 | Cox | So mayor it came. The staff report says he represents a group of Sausalito businesses and residents. |
03:41:49.93 | Unknown | I was asking CM Manager what he knows. |
03:41:52.74 | Unknown | Yeah. |
03:41:53.27 | Unknown | This came at the request of Councilmember Hoffman |
03:41:56.62 | Unknown | Three meetings ago, two meetings ago, last meeting, it was brought forward as something you wanted to hear tonight in terms of direction. There was no direction given to do anything but bring it forward. And that's what we've done. |
03:42:10.07 | Unknown | Okay. And then in terms of just, and maybe it's for Sergio or for you to have something go on the ballot, there's a process where you can gather signatures. Is that |
03:42:18.92 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:42:18.94 | Unknown | Right. Yeah. And I leave that to the city attorney to do it for you. |
03:42:22.79 | Unknown | Yes, typically the |
03:42:25.19 | Unknown | authors of the measure would come to the city attorney's office, ask for a ballot title and summary to be prepared. |
03:42:32.00 | Unknown | At that point, they can go out and gather signatures after they... |
03:42:36.51 | Unknown | publish that they are doing so. |
03:42:39.72 | Unknown | And then after they gather 10% of the signatures of the registered voters in the city, then that is... |
03:42:47.71 | Unknown | reviewed, the signatures are verified, and at that point the Council has a choice as to whether or not to place the measure on the ballot. |
03:42:56.10 | Unknown | or adopt the measure outright. |
03:42:57.84 | Unknown | Okay, that was not done in this case, correct? |
03:43:00.42 | Unknown | No, that was not done. So they haven't been filed to gather signatures either, or giving you any indication of signature gathering? |
03:43:00.45 | Unknown | No, that was not. |
03:43:07.88 | Unknown | No, I have not received a request to prepare a title and summary for this particular measure. So that is step one in gathering signatures. |
03:43:15.64 | Unknown | So, Chris. |
03:43:17.95 | Unknown | For something to go on the November ballot, what would be the deadline for city council to act? |
03:43:22.93 | Unknown | I believe it's the end of the first week of August is the deadline. Let me look at the calendar really quickly. It's that Friday. |
03:43:30.39 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:43:30.42 | Cox | Stassi says August 9th. August 9th. |
03:43:30.53 | Unknown | That's a good question. |
03:43:32.13 | Unknown | August 9th, yes. |
03:43:33.87 | Unknown | And for that to happen, the city council would have to take what steps we I think there's some sort of resolution we'd have to adopt it i'm not familiar with the actual X, so what would be the steps to get from here to there. |
03:43:46.32 | Unknown | From here to there, you would need a direct staff. |
03:43:49.16 | Unknown | I love him, too. |
03:43:49.86 | Unknown | And, |
03:43:50.02 | Unknown | I appreciate it, but I actually don't know the answer. |
03:43:52.50 | Cox | Because you didn't read the staff report? |
03:43:54.66 | Unknown | Are you really asking me that question? |
03:43:55.48 | Cox | Yeah, it's outlined in the staff. If you want the public to hear what the steps are. |
03:43:55.99 | Unknown | you. |
03:43:58.88 | Unknown | I would love the public to hear what the steps are. How many in the public maybe would like to know what the process is? There you go. Thank you. An overwhelming majority. You don't. |
03:44:05.76 | Unknown | There you go. Thank you. |
03:44:07.74 | Unknown | you |
03:44:07.97 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:44:08.04 | Unknown | No. |
03:44:08.19 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:44:08.44 | Unknown | I actually don't know. |
03:44:09.90 | Unknown | Thank you. I actually don't know. |
03:44:12.29 | Unknown | I really don't. |
03:44:13.17 | Cox | Okay. |
03:44:13.35 | Unknown | I'd be. |
03:44:13.39 | Cox | I'd say. |
03:44:13.73 | Unknown | I mean, as you can imagine, |
03:44:16.48 | Cox | Thank you. |
03:44:16.53 | Kellerman | the staff report. |
03:44:18.89 | Kellerman | May I reserve a presentation? |
03:44:20.24 | Unknown | I asked that there was a presentation, but there isn't. So that's why I'm asking these questions, because I actually don't know. |
03:44:26.72 | Unknown | And I am so again, city attorney, what are the steps from getting from here to that? |
03:44:33.66 | Unknown | So if you wanted to place the measure on the ballot as is, again, without going through the signature gathering process, this could only go on the ballot as a city-sponsored measure. |
03:44:45.03 | Unknown | And |
03:44:47.44 | Unknown | In order for that to happen, there needs to be a resolution placing the measure on the ballot. |
03:44:52.28 | Unknown | We do need to figure out what the form of ballot question would be. So that would be another... |
03:44:57.92 | Unknown | business item and discussion point. |
03:45:00.20 | Unknown | Um, additionally, um, |
03:45:04.74 | Unknown | Again, |
03:45:05.70 | Unknown | The city would need to comply with CEQA before placing this on the ballot. |
03:45:11.56 | Unknown | Having not spent a lot of time studying this measure, I don't know exactly what sort of Sequel analysis we may need to do. |
03:45:19.25 | Unknown | To the extent that it doesn't change existing zoning or development standards, chances are that the city may be able to rely on a CEQA exemption and not dedicate significant resources to CEQA analysis with this particular measure. |
03:45:33.17 | Unknown | Um, |
03:45:35.10 | Unknown | But yeah, the key issue is that the city would need to |
03:45:39.86 | Unknown | develop and have the council approve a form of ballot question, the council will need to pass a resolution placing this measure on the ballot for the November election prior to August 9th. |
03:45:50.15 | Unknown | Could that be taken at one meeting? So that for instance, could be our next scheduled meeting on July the 16th. |
03:45:56.29 | Unknown | That could, yes. |
03:45:57.52 | Unknown | So it could all happen at that one meeting. If there was action from the city council to prepare that ballot initiative, then it could be done at that meeting or at the July 30th meeting, but no later than the end of the first week of August. |
03:46:10.05 | Unknown | Correct. |
03:46:11.09 | Unknown | Okay, thanks for that clarification on the timeline. Okay, are there any other questions? |
03:46:17.28 | Cox | Yeah. |
03:46:17.40 | Cox | Yes, I have questions after Joan. Go ahead. Go ahead. So Sergio, the staff report outlines two different ways to put |
03:46:18.04 | Unknown | Questions after Joan. |
03:46:26.01 | Cox | an initiative on the ballot. One is by gathering signatures and the other is for the city council to place it on the ballot without the need for |
03:46:36.02 | Cox | collecting signatures. Is that right? |
03:46:38.65 | Unknown | Correct. Yes. |
03:46:39.78 | Cox | And so it's not illegal or improper |
03:46:42.58 | Cox | to put an initiative on the ballot without gathering signatures, so long as the city council votes to do so. Is that right? |
03:46:49.52 | Unknown | Yes, that is an option this council has, is the council can decide that it wants this to be a city measure. |
03:46:56.98 | Cox | And- |
03:46:57.97 | Cox | Either way, |
03:46:59.30 | Cox | ultimately the decision is made by the people not by the Council |
03:47:03.69 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:47:03.71 | Andrew Junius | Correct. |
03:47:06.05 | Cox | Thank you for that clarification. |
03:47:08.99 | Unknown | Council Member of Boston. |
03:47:09.99 | Blaustein | Sure, I have some questions having read the staff report and the measure, but I'd still like to make some things clear for members of the public. |
03:47:18.52 | Blaustein | Um, |
03:47:19.45 | Blaustein | So often in the measure itself, the general plan is referred to. So this might be a question for the city attorney or the question for the city manager, because many of us, myself included, Councilmember Kelman included, Vice Mayor Cox, were involved on the general plan advisory committee. So just for clarification and for those here, how many years... |
03:47:38.23 | Blaustein | Did we have the general plan advisory committee for? |
03:47:41.47 | Blaustein | I'm asking. |
03:47:42.33 | Blaustein | But you guys can answer three years. Sure. We can all answer three years. Okay. And how much money did we spend on the general plan? Roughly in consultants. |
03:47:50.25 | Unknown | I heard it was around $800,000. |
03:47:52.21 | Blaustein | So we spent $800,000 and we spent three years and putting together the general plan. And how many meetings roughly did we have outreach meetings and general conversations around the general plan? |
03:48:01.69 | Unknown | Yeah, that predated me, Councilmember Blaustein. |
03:48:05.39 | Blaustein | 56 general plan advisory committee meetings. Okay. And then we had a number of public workshops as well around the general plan, right? I remember that we had one specific to the Marin ship, for example, at the Spinnaker. |
03:48:15.31 | Blaustein | I think we had another specific. Okay, so that's that one. And then, in addition to the general plan advisory committee and the general plan which we ratified in 2022 and I'm very sorry that you were not able to be part of the vote on that vice mayor since you worked so hard on that. So that's the general plan. Okay, and then we have the |
03:48:33.85 | Blaustein | Because this measure talks about zoning, we have the Housing Element Advisory Committee. How many years did we work on that for? |
03:48:40.03 | Blaustein | Two. And how much money did we spend on consultants for the Housing Element Advisory Committee? |
03:48:44.45 | Unknown | Still spending. |
03:48:45.50 | Unknown | Okay. |
03:48:45.53 | Blaustein | Okay, but upwards of a million dollars. So we're at over $2 million and almost 100 meetings for these two items, correct? |
03:48:47.59 | Unknown | Those. |
03:48:54.12 | Unknown | That's a fair assessment. |
03:48:55.37 | Blaustein | That's a fair assessment. OK, and if we were going to make changes or zoning changes as a result of what we've worked on for three or five years on the general plan or on housing, we would still then, as a group, have |
03:49:07.28 | Blaustein | substantial conversations, meetings, and additional funding to talk about any zoning changes, correct? |
03:49:14.24 | Blaustein | As it stands now, if we wanted to change something in the general plan, because from my understanding of the measure and forgive me because I don't know who to ask questions to of the measure, given the context under which it was submitted. I'm just trying to understand here. If we were to make a change to the general plan, what would that process require of us. |
03:49:32.12 | Unknown | Let's let the city attorney answer that. |
03:49:34.27 | Unknown | So typically if you're initiating a voluntary general plan amendment, one, you have to do consultation with the tribe. You have to notify all potentially affected public agencies. |
03:49:48.91 | Unknown | You have to develop your general plan amendment and there's a number of |
03:49:54.30 | Unknown | you know, elements in the general plan, you know, you have your transportation, your and circulation element, you have your safety element, you have your housing element, you have your land use element, and each of them have specific requirements. |
03:50:05.37 | Unknown | Typically, some of what you're doing may depend on what exact |
03:50:09.38 | Unknown | you're amending, |
03:50:10.97 | Unknown | Um, |
03:50:11.81 | Unknown | But |
03:50:12.81 | Unknown | Additionally, you will have to have the whatever amendment you're proposed studied under CEQA. |
03:50:18.26 | Unknown | to the extent that there are environmental impacts. |
03:50:21.75 | Unknown | you will need to |
03:50:23.68 | Unknown | prepare the amendment itself, put it out there for public review and comment, take it to the Planning Commission for study and recommendation, and then potentially adopt it by the City Council. |
03:50:34.43 | Blaustein | And then there would be a requirement for public comment and public engagement at each of those levels, correct? |
03:50:40.10 | Unknown | Yes, and the amount does vary depending on what it is. So for example, the housing element has more requirements. |
03:50:46.42 | Blaustein | Let me ask you one final thing just for clarification and importance. |
03:50:49.78 | Blaustein | on a ballot initiative, is that the same? Do we need, is that level of engagement required? |
03:50:55.74 | Unknown | Um, |
03:50:57.00 | Unknown | Not by statute. |
03:50:59.05 | Blaustein | Okay, so there wouldn't need to be that level of public outreach, that level of consultants, that level of engagement or workshops. This could all just be passed in one measure without that level of consideration. |
03:51:09.34 | Unknown | Yes. |
03:51:10.35 | Blaustein | Okay. |
03:51:10.69 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
03:51:10.88 | Blaustein | All right. Thank you. That's it. |
03:51:12.70 | Blaustein | That's my... |
03:51:13.04 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
03:51:13.42 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
03:51:13.49 | Kellerman | Yes, thank you. |
03:51:15.94 | Kellerman | Thank you, everybody, for bearing with us. I'm going to respectfully ask my colleagues. It's clear we all have opinions on this topic, that we actually turn over to public comment and not |
03:51:27.97 | Kellerman | do what we're doing because it was not our time yet. And I will just say that I'm glad we've had over 100 meetings, which I participated in probably 98% of them having served on both the general plan and the Housing and Element Committee. So I feel we have very thoroughly vetted this issue over the last six years. So you can spin it both ways. But I really want to hear from the public. That's why my intention here tonight. So can we perhaps open public comment and I will save my questions. |
03:51:55.95 | Unknown | Of course, city clerk. Could you please open public comment? Babette McDougall? Ms. McDougall. |
03:51:58.31 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
03:52:03.00 | Mayor Sobieski | Oh, I'm going by the order that these were received. I thought |
03:52:06.46 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:52:06.48 | Craig Merrilees | I thought we were told that you were looking for a presenter and we have |
03:52:13.95 | Unknown | Ms. McDougal, you're first in line. |
03:52:18.83 | Unknown | He's a member of the public, he has public comment. |
03:52:23.84 | Unknown | I know nothing about city manager is... |
03:52:27.73 | Craig Merrilees | I received the communication from the city clerk asking for the presenters and I notified the city clerk that I would be presenting along with an attorney. |
03:52:41.76 | Unknown | is all news to me. I thought I looked to the city. I asked at the beginning of this session if there was a presentation and was told by the city manager there was not a presentation. |
03:52:50.00 | Unknown | I wasn't aware of a presentation, Mayor and Council. |
03:52:52.65 | Mayor Sobieski | I'm not aware of it either. If I got that email afterwards, I wanted a clarification because you sent me a – were you Craig? |
03:53:00.46 | Craig Merrilees | Yes. |
03:53:00.53 | Mayor Sobieski | Yes. |
03:53:00.95 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
03:53:01.07 | Mayor Sobieski | Yeah, you sent me something for public comment. That's what I assumed it was for. |
03:53:05.17 | Craig Merrilees | The note I put in your hand. |
03:53:06.03 | Mayor Sobieski | to be. |
03:53:06.17 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
03:53:06.18 | Kellerman | I'm sorry about this. Pardon me, Craig. We know this is going to be controversial, and we know people are going to have strong opinions, and we know that there's going to be disagreement up here. Just for the sake of all the transparency we want, let us have some type of presentation, and then everybody can say we've heard and we consider the process. And there have been examples, of course, none have come to mind at this late hour of when we have, in fact, called people from the audience to say, oh, is anybody available? So if we just respectfully could just hear more, I think it's helpful. |
03:53:30.85 | Unknown | I think we just... |
03:53:32.74 | Unknown | I would like to respond. |
03:53:34.57 | Kellerman | Yes, of course. I was just trying to get out my thought before you issued your response. |
03:53:36.37 | Unknown | I know. |
03:53:37.86 | Unknown | I just look, this is all pretty unprecedented. The whole way this is coming out is unprecedented. |
03:53:44.24 | Unknown | We can give Mr. Mayor, there's some amount of time. I would like to give equal time to people that have had the opportunity to study and reflect, but they don't have the virtue of that because of the way this was all unfolded. So this is not the way to do business, for sure. That's part of my objection to this procedure, but we dutifully agendize it. |
03:54:05.75 | Cox | The precedent I would point out is the Sausalito Center for the Arts. |
03:54:09.11 | Cox | where we listened to a presentation from the Saucyde Center for the Arts, not from staff, regarding the requests of the council. |
03:54:20.20 | Kellerman | I'm just suggesting that this is going to be difficult enough. And I think this would just be helpful if we just heard and recognize your comments, Mayor. Great point. Vice Mayor makes also a great point. And I still want to create more of the controversy that we're going to hear. |
03:54:33.29 | Unknown | But I think it is unfair. We didn't know there was a presentation. We didn't give the opportunity for the property owners who were completely blindsided by this, the many businesses in the ownership that knew nothing about this, had no opportunity to be reached out to or engaged, an opportunity to prepare |
03:54:34.69 | Kellerman | Okay. |
03:54:47.57 | Unknown | a presentation to inform the public about why this is bad. |
03:54:52.14 | Unknown | So- |
03:54:52.61 | Kellerman | Think of a merit example, it's a pretty good example of how we needed somebody from the audience who came to give a presentation and wasn't staff and we gave them as much time. |
03:55:01.66 | Kellerman | And that was your decision as the mayor. So- |
03:55:04.16 | Kellerman | I think there's just a parallel here is all I'm suggesting. If you don't want to allow it, I respect that, and we want to allow it. |
03:55:08.68 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
03:55:08.71 | Unknown | Thanks. I think we should proceed with public comment. |
03:55:14.26 | Unknown | It's a mess that you're going. |
03:55:21.39 | McDougall | First of all, I'd like to applaud each and every one of you. This is the closest we've come yet to real democracy. |
03:55:28.22 | McDougall | Mm-hmm. |
03:55:31.34 | McDougall | We just might get there. |
03:55:33.70 | McDougall | I'm encouraged. I am so encouraged just for that. |
03:55:38.08 | McDougall | Okay, so we've gone through an awful lot of stuff here. |
03:55:41.75 | McDougall | I just want to say one thing. |
03:55:44.67 | McDougall | We have to focus on what is the bottom line question. |
03:55:48.62 | McDougall | What are we specifically looking for in our direction? |
03:55:52.77 | McDougall | You know, we're here to wrap up the current budget year. We're actually here to transition to the new year. |
03:55:58.58 | McDougall | A lot of what we're hearing tonight is the new stuff overlaying the old stuff. Well, that just means the old stuff is still here. But there's also the new stuff. |
03:56:09.82 | McDougall | I say we have to be flexible and move forward, and it's going to take some creative thinking. |
03:56:16.95 | McDougall | but I'm not opposing anything, I'm encouraging you. |
03:56:20.78 | McDougall | Thank you. |
03:56:23.65 | Mayor Sobieski | All right. |
03:56:23.99 | Mayor Sobieski | Catherine Abbasi, then followed by... |
03:56:29.24 | Mayor Sobieski | Bruce Hoff. |
03:56:31.91 | Mayor Sobieski | And then Ken Peterson. |
03:56:36.73 | Mayor Sobieski | Catherine, are you here? |
03:56:39.36 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
03:56:40.23 | Mayor Sobieski | All right, then. Bruce Hoffman. |
03:56:43.85 | Blaustein | Can we make sure people in the overflow room can hear who's being called for comments so everyone has an opportunity? I know there's an overflow room. I just want to make sure. |
03:56:49.25 | Katie Thau Garcia | want to make sure. |
03:56:50.42 | Blaustein | There was. I think there was. Wasn't there? Did people leave? I just want to make sure everyone gets a chance to comment because it's late and everyone's been here. Just making sure. |
03:57:00.71 | Unknown | Is it okay? |
03:57:03.88 | Unknown | Anyway, |
03:57:05.47 | Unknown | Good evening, council members. |
03:57:08.00 | Cox | Another member of the General Plan Advisory Committee. |
03:57:11.65 | Unknown | Yeah, and I think I made it to 100% of the meetings. |
03:57:12.31 | Cox | Okay. |
03:57:15.02 | Unknown | The |
03:57:16.96 | Unknown | It's... |
03:57:17.98 | Unknown | It occurred to me when I was sitting in the audience. |
03:57:21.67 | Unknown | The first time I ever attended city council, I was about 35 years old. |
03:57:27.91 | Unknown | I'm now... |
03:57:29.01 | Unknown | Two years shy of 80. |
03:57:31.34 | Unknown | And |
03:57:32.67 | Unknown | It's the same subject. |
03:57:35.29 | Unknown | It's exactly the same subject. |
03:57:38.80 | Unknown | Um... |
03:57:41.11 | Unknown | I wrote a letter. I hope you had a chance to read it. |
03:57:47.51 | Unknown | because I'm not going to |
03:57:50.38 | Unknown | belabor it or go over it. I just have two points to make. |
03:57:54.19 | Unknown | One is that |
03:57:55.96 | Unknown | Um, |
03:57:58.46 | Unknown | Most of the property owners in the Marin ship are families. |
03:58:02.17 | Unknown | They're longstanding families. |
03:58:04.50 | Unknown | They've contributed to this city. |
03:58:06.81 | Unknown | They've contributed to the nonprofits in this city. |
03:58:09.86 | Unknown | I've got tenants. |
03:58:11.75 | Unknown | who have been |
03:58:12.90 | Unknown | in my buildings for 20 to 25 years. |
03:58:17.69 | Unknown | that, |
03:58:18.42 | Unknown | Do the same. |
03:58:19.55 | Unknown | they participate in |
03:58:22.07 | Unknown | the nonprofits of this city, |
03:58:24.40 | Unknown | They contribute their time, their money, and their efforts. |
03:58:28.02 | Unknown | And I think that from what I read, |
03:58:31.23 | Unknown | in the initiative. |
03:58:33.52 | Unknown | This is a major stab in the back. |
03:58:35.77 | Unknown | to |
03:58:36.78 | Unknown | All of them. |
03:58:38.96 | Unknown | The, it's... |
03:58:47.73 | Unknown | It's an economic... |
03:58:51.07 | Unknown | catastrophe. |
03:58:52.91 | Unknown | that |
03:58:55.14 | Unknown | I think would result from this. I got seven seconds left. So... |
03:59:01.17 | Unknown | Thank you. |
03:59:01.66 | Unknown | It's it. Excuse me. Yep. All right. I'm done. Thank you. |
03:59:07.97 | Mayor Sobieski | Cam Pettersson then followed by Casey Pettersson. |
03:59:11.90 | Cox | Is your mic on, Walford? I'm having a hard time hearing you. |
03:59:15.04 | Mayor Sobieski | Anderson followed by a |
03:59:15.97 | Cox | THE FAMILY. |
03:59:16.03 | Mayor Sobieski | DC Pedersen. |
03:59:16.64 | Cox | Thank you. |
03:59:17.47 | James Kavanaugh | And I believe. |
03:59:21.38 | Casey Peterson | Yeah. Hi, council. I'm Casey Peterson, third generation operator at Clipper Yacht Harbor. Our property makes up 53% of the waterfront zone. We have 700 slips, 15 landside maritime tenants that support 145 maritime employees. And we supply the property for the Saucy the Boat Show. we're a large part of the Working Waterfront and this initiative does not represent us or our needs. The Working Waterfront Coalition does not represent Clipper or any of the tenants that we have spoken with. As you can tell by the letters written from the biggest maritime businesses in the Marin ship. |
04:00:05.53 | Casey Peterson | This group is the working waterfront in name only. It is alarming the amount of opposition from those they claim to protect. |
04:00:14.99 | Casey Peterson | For this initiative to be drafted behind closed doors with very little input from community and stakeholders is very upsetting. For this to be put on the agenda with six days of this being in the public is equally as upsetting. |
04:00:28.93 | Casey Peterson | Clipper is a certified clean green marina. We have 240 kilowatts of solar on our property. We host the cleanest boat yard in the bay. These are our values. And we are putting the blue economy principles into practice. John DeRay himself said, |
04:00:46.31 | Casey Peterson | Clipper is doing this right. |
04:00:49.15 | Casey Peterson | Why were we not |
04:00:51.19 | Casey Peterson | consulted to have input on this document. |
04:00:56.93 | Casey Peterson | I'm here tonight to preserve the historic Marin ship. |
04:00:59.76 | Casey Peterson | in which we are a large part |
04:01:01.48 | Casey Peterson | as well as make sure it has room to thrive in the future. |
04:01:05.01 | Casey Peterson | Those two are not mutually exclusive. |
04:01:07.76 | Casey Peterson | I'm asking, I don't understand why this group should have a second chance when the first draft was so careless. |
04:01:13.94 | Casey Peterson | Thank you. |
04:01:13.97 | Casey Peterson | Thank you. |
04:01:14.27 | Casey Peterson | I would ask to dismiss this and take no further action on this item. Thank you. |
04:01:21.95 | Mayor Sobieski | Michael Rex. |
04:01:24.53 | Mayor Sobieski | followed by Mary Griffin. |
04:01:29.19 | Unknown | Thank you. |
04:01:41.43 | Michael Rex | Well, I'm Michael Rex. I'm speaking on behalf of the RBMA. |
04:01:46.67 | Michael Rex | For those that don't know the RBMA, |
04:01:50.52 | Michael Rex | I brought our mission statement here. |
04:01:53.17 | Michael Rex | Richardson Bay Maritime Association is a volunteer nonprofit organization established in 1998. Charlie Merrill, Cameron Dorsey. |
04:02:02.91 | Michael Rex | Barry Hibbon. |
04:02:05.00 | Michael Rex | Thank you. |
04:02:05.09 | Michael Rex | founded it for the purpose of preserving and revitalizing Saucido's maritime heritage and tradition. |
04:02:11.51 | Michael Rex | The RBMA serves as a public resource to promote the working waterfront |
04:02:16.17 | Michael Rex | and traditional maritime skills. We were instrumental in bringing the Matthew Turner to be built in Sausalito. |
04:02:23.55 | Michael Rex | We, uh, |
04:02:25.59 | Michael Rex | Uh, |
04:02:28.00 | Michael Rex | We helped save Spalding when Myron died. We were the matchmaker to bring in the master mariners until a permanent operator could take over. We funded the Charlie Merrill Dory to be built. That'll be used at the small boating center. No one talked to us about this. And yet we've been at it for many, many years. I want to read a statement that was voted on by the majority of our board in an emergency meeting last night. |
04:03:07.29 | Michael Rex | Okay? |
04:03:08.82 | Michael Rex | On behalf of the Richmond Bay Maritime Association, |
04:03:12.28 | Michael Rex | We share the Solito Working Waterfront Coalition's intent |
04:03:16.85 | Michael Rex | to promote and preserve the industrial, marine, and art uses in the marineship. |
04:03:21.61 | Michael Rex | But putting this initiative is currently written on the November ballot as premature. |
04:03:26.74 | Michael Rex | because its impacts have not been fully identified. And there needs to be a broader dialogue within the community and among stakeholders to achieve these shared objectives more effectively. Thank you. |
04:03:41.69 | Mayor Sobieski | Mary Griffin, then followed by Sophia Collier. |
04:03:45.29 | Unknown | I appreciate everyone's desire to express themselves, but if we could please save our comment and signs of approval to the public comment alone, that would be appreciated. |
04:03:55.45 | Mary Griffin | Mary Griffin, I'm an architect and served on the housing element and went to a few of the meetings that you people have attended and I admire you for all the meetings, but this does seem very. |
04:04:06.77 | Mary Griffin | coming out of left field and hearing the comments we've already heard. So I urge you not to vote. |
04:04:11.93 | Mary Griffin | to put the Marinship Blue Economy Innovation District on the ballot for the November elections. The authors of this initiative should gather signatures like other sponsors. |
04:04:22.11 | Mary Griffin | Clearly this needs more community input |
04:04:24.79 | Mary Griffin | It has to be coordinated with the housing element |
04:04:27.73 | Mary Griffin | the all these other |
04:04:29.30 | Mary Griffin | projects that we're working on. So please don't bypass the process. This seems very upsetting to have this come out of the blue like this, not or maybe it should be out of the black, not the blue. Okay, thank you. |
04:04:43.25 | Mayor Sobieski | Sophia Collier followed by Jacqueline Amikas. |
04:04:46.55 | Sophia Collier | Yes, Sophia Collier. And my basic, I have two points or two words, CEQA and caution. |
04:04:55.34 | Sophia Collier | Because one of the things is we're in a lot of trouble where we didn't necessarily keep an eye on some of those details and that we cannot. We have the YIMBY lawsuit where there was an allegation made hopefully very well unfounded. |
04:05:08.16 | Sophia Collier | that we didn't take account of CEQA. |
04:05:10.56 | Sophia Collier | And that if we come again, and gosh, maybe it's a close call, and we say, hey, we don't need CEQA now, and then we go ahead with that, we'll be in a position where we're, the lawsuit pretty much writes itself. So I just feel like I urge caution, caution, caution here. And the other thing that I feel like is that what kind of message does this send to the state of California? We're supposed to do it, modify Ordinance 1022 and 1128 by November under one reading of one of the letters. Instead, we put an initiative to, with this initiative on, that is not the kind of message that we should be sending to the state of California either. So again, it |
04:05:50.30 | Sophia Collier | But the folks, if they support it, they're free to go and get signatures. |
04:05:56.69 | Sophia Collier | And remove all and put it on the ballot and remove all the risk from the city council that will take all the risk away from us shifted from Sausalito to the voters to make a decision. That is the way I urge us to act in a cautious manner we talked a lot about risk, how to reduce legal fees, how to reduce risk, this is what we need to do, we need to think about how to reduce risk. |
04:06:19.19 | Sophia Collier | Thank you. |
04:06:21.87 | Mayor Sobieski | Jacqueline Mikas, then followed by Adrian Brinton. |
04:06:32.59 | Unknown | Thank you. |
04:06:33.99 | Jacqueline Amaricus | Good evening, Council. My name is Jacqueline Amaricus. I've been a resident in Sausalito for over 20 years, as well as a business owner in the Marineship. |
04:06:45.19 | Jacqueline Amaricus | for over 20 years. |
04:06:47.62 | Jacqueline Amaricus | And... |
04:06:49.13 | Jacqueline Amaricus | I want to reiterate what Council Joanne Cox said. There are two ways that the voters can approve this measure. One is where the city council can agree to put this |
04:07:07.18 | Jacqueline Amaricus | revision onto the ballot. |
04:07:09.92 | Jacqueline Amaricus | Thank you. |
04:07:09.97 | Jacqueline Amaricus | And the other way is by gathering signatures and putting them on the ballot. So either way, |
04:07:16.33 | Jacqueline Amaricus | The public does have a voice. |
04:07:20.72 | Jacqueline Amaricus | Council, I don't... Council is at no risk as far as deciding whether they're wanting... |
04:07:28.93 | Jacqueline Amaricus | Thank you. |
04:07:30.60 | Jacqueline Amaricus | Um, |
04:07:32.26 | Jacqueline Amaricus | And everyone seems to think that there's an issue with |
04:07:35.94 | Jacqueline Amaricus | the public not having a say. |
04:07:39.18 | Jacqueline Amaricus | This will be put to a vote if the council people approve so. |
04:07:46.25 | Jacqueline Amaricus | getting signatures, you put it to a ballot. |
04:07:51.88 | Jacqueline Amaricus | There's two ways of doing this. |
04:07:55.39 | Jacqueline Amaricus | And... |
04:07:56.84 | Jacqueline Amaricus | I feel that the council should put this on a ballot. |
04:08:01.35 | Jacqueline Amaricus | to attract businesses |
04:08:04.07 | Jacqueline Amaricus | Timoring, sir. |
04:08:05.74 | Jacqueline Amaricus | I happen to be a professional. |
04:08:08.39 | Jacqueline Amaricus | I'm going to be |
04:08:09.18 | Jacqueline Amaricus | Shut up. |
04:08:10.58 | Jacqueline Amaricus | I. |
04:08:11.34 | Jacqueline Amaricus | that I don't have to leave. |
04:08:14.12 | Jacqueline Amaricus | throughout the verbiage. |
04:08:16.08 | Jacqueline Amaricus | But I don't have to vacate and find you on the first... |
04:08:20.23 | Jacqueline Amaricus | getting a job or anything like that. |
04:08:23.10 | Jacqueline Amaricus | I think that there's been a lot of missing from the machine |
04:08:26.26 | Jacqueline Amaricus | put out into the public. |
04:08:27.96 | Jacqueline Amaricus | by certain stakeholders who want to develop their empty office buildings |
04:08:33.97 | Jacqueline Amaricus | and with the guise of the housing element. |
04:08:37.16 | Jacqueline Amaricus | in order to |
04:08:39.37 | Jacqueline Amaricus | to end. |
04:08:40.20 | Jacqueline Amaricus | Thank you very much for your time. |
04:08:42.98 | Mayor Sobieski | Adrian Brinton followed by Curtis Havill. |
04:08:47.67 | Adrian Brenton | Thank you. |
04:08:48.79 | Adrian Brenton | Adrian Brenton, I'm a South Slater resident. I sent in an email with a pretty detailed discussion about the economics of this. So I'm not going to speak to that, but I do want to speak a bit to the process. You know, we're talking about moving this out and, you know, taking it off the agenda tonight. |
04:09:03.38 | Adrian Brenton | you know, why there was a request, why is it being moved? I think that's kind of emblematic of the lack of transparency that we've seen |
04:09:09.93 | Adrian Brenton | with this process, you know, this process is broken. It's a winner take all, all or nothing, high stakes thing that we're doing here. Put it on the ballot, vote it up, vote it down. There's no other choice, right? |
04:09:24.59 | Adrian Brenton | This isn't the way we should be doing zoning. You know, you guys talked about all of the meetings that we had to get to this point in the zoning. There's a ton of different interests in the Marin ship. This is representing one slice of those interests. We need to represent all of the interests. You know, this is driving a huge wedge into the community, right? There's a big wedge in the middle of the Marin ship and it's being hammered in by this issue. And it's really, really sad to see. |
04:09:46.95 | Adrian Brenton | Put this, if it's got to go to a vote, put it out to the signatures. That's the first step in finding out if there's actually public support for this. Making people get up here and do this, it's intimidating. Like, it's taken me like 10 times up here talking to you like this to start to feel a little bit comfortable with it. You know, you're not going to get a ton of public input by doing it this way. You do through the meetings. So I certainly hope that we do that. Thank you very much. |
04:10:13.84 | Mayor Sobieski | Curtis Havel. |
04:10:18.70 | Curtis Havill | Good evening. |
04:10:19.47 | Curtis Havill | My name is Curtis Havill. I'm a harbormaster down at Clipper Yacht Harbor. Prior to being a harbormaster, I was a land use professional with the Marin County Community Development Agency for nearly 20 years. I worked as a public servant for so many years because I believe in the process and I was proud of what we did there. |
04:10:36.03 | Curtis Havill | I took pride in the fact that my colleagues and I were responsible for administering a process that was transparent, objective and driven by community input. |
04:10:44.36 | Curtis Havill | I thought it was interesting tonight how staff didn't have any kind of a presentation because they hadn't been involved in this process. And it is not a city sponsored initiative at this point. |
04:10:54.17 | Curtis Havill | problem with this initiative that the blue economy innovation, |
04:10:58.91 | Curtis Havill | initiative is that it hasn't been vetted through that process. If the city is going to embrace this and forward it as a city sponsored process, there needs to be an agenda, there needs to be meetings, there needs to be an opportunity for the community to have meaningful input on this. |
04:11:15.73 | Curtis Havill | We only found out about this five days ago. So there's, there's been no opportunity. We had no part, the folks at Clipper Yacht Harbor and the businesses that we have at Clipper Yacht Harbor had no part of |
04:11:27.73 | Curtis Havill | providing information and input to the document that came before you in the staff report or along with the staff report. |
04:11:37.30 | Curtis Havill | What we're looking for is we want a seat at the table. We want to have input. I think that the businesses along the waterfront would have valuable input with this. Back in 2010, there was the Waterfront and Marinship Steering Committee that created a document that the mayor at the time said, this won't be put on the shelf, and yet it's on the shelf. Perhaps we could dust that off and use that as a starting point for this community conversation that really needs to occur and really should include the entirety of the waterfront |
04:12:06.86 | Curtis Havill | and not just a limited portion of it. |
04:12:10.71 | Curtis Havill | Finally, I think that I totally agree with the Council Member Kelman's earlier comments about democracy. There's hope, there's despair, there's balance. This is democracy. So |
04:12:23.49 | Mayor Sobieski | Craig Merrilees, followed by Mark Wolfe. |
04:12:33.09 | Craig Merrilees | I was going to think. |
04:12:35.79 | Craig Merrilees | Hello. |
04:12:36.02 | Unknown | Hello. |
04:12:37.34 | Unknown | Just speaking to the microphone. It's a little weak. You got to maybe just, sorry, you have to lean over or pick. How sad is it? Yeah. I got a certain kind of into it. Sorry. Sorry. |
04:12:38.22 | Craig Merrilees | The mic on? |
04:12:45.95 | Craig Merrilees | So I was going to thank you for the warm reception, Mr. Mayor, but I had to revise that. |
04:12:51.08 | Unknown | Thank you. |
04:12:51.09 | Andrew Junius | Exactly. |
04:12:54.05 | Craig Merrilees | I am proud to be here with volunteers and supporters for the Working Waterfront Coalition. And along with the letters that were carefully written, thoughtfully written by architects, political leaders in the area, you know, we're behind this. We also want to acknowledge and welcome that there are other groups that hold different views. And part of our process being here tonight is hear what's being said. |
04:13:24.12 | Craig Merrilees | We've heard from people who wanted us to first gather signatures and we're prepared to talk about that. Our attorney will have more on that in a minute. We're also here to gather feedback, specific suggestions, including taking responsibility for a couple of typos that found their way into the document, but those have been corrected. And we've also been getting important feedback from |
04:13:54.16 | Craig Merrilees | owners and operators in the working waterfront. The problem is real. And the successful maritime and businesses, along with artists in the studios, are slowly being squeezed out or give up searching for affordable housing, excuse me, for affordable office space. Housing too, for that matter. And having attended most of the housing advisory committees I can say that's a fact um |
04:14:25.09 | Craig Merrilees | Thank you. |
04:14:25.68 | Craig Merrilees | We will continue to work on this. We'll do our best to be open. I realize people are concerned about not gathering those signatures. But there are two equally valid ways to do this, and we chose one of them. |
04:14:47.84 | Craig Merrilees | That's what we did. Thank you. Mark Wolf. |
04:14:56.69 | Mark Wolf | Good evening, Mr. Mayor, members of the council. I'm Mark Wolf, and I am the attorney that I would say co-wrote, co-drafted the measure. It was a collaborative process. |
04:15:06.15 | Mark Wolf | I personally don't live in Sausalito. I kind of wish I did. |
04:15:09.98 | Mark Wolf | I live in San Francisco, so I really don't have standing to get into the merits of the measure based on what I've seen in your general plan. |
04:15:19.12 | Mark Wolf | It really accomplishes a locking in of policies that have been declared forcefully, repeatedly, unequivocally. |
04:15:27.54 | Mark Wolf | not only in this iteration of the plan, but in the prior iteration, as well as in the Marineship specific plan. |
04:15:32.47 | Mark Wolf | But I will leave that up to... |
04:15:35.44 | Mark Wolf | others to debate whether it's good for the city or not. What I do want to say is, yes, there are two ways of doing this. One is you gather signatures. One is you present something that you would like to be enacted or put onto the ballot by the council in a form and see if you can persuade a majority of the council to do that. |
04:15:53.77 | Mark Wolf | The one thing that I think is missing from this discussion currently is |
04:15:57.60 | Mark Wolf | is as you've heard, if signatures are gathered, |
04:16:01.02 | Mark Wolf | And they qualify. There's enough of them. |
04:16:03.33 | Mark Wolf | It's presented to you and you have two choices. |
04:16:06.14 | Mark Wolf | You can send it to the ballot, which is what we're asking you to do, or you can adopt it outright. |
04:16:10.47 | Mark Wolf | You don't have to send it to the ballot. And in my experience doing this for a living, |
04:16:15.23 | Mark Wolf | It is increasingly common. |
04:16:18.13 | Mark Wolf | that people gather signatures, which is very easy to do. There's, |
04:16:21.44 | Mark Wolf | professional signature firms that |
04:16:23.53 | Mark Wolf | get paid to do this. |
04:16:25.00 | Mark Wolf | They present it to a council and the council adopts it outright. |
04:16:29.34 | Mark Wolf | without a vote of the people. I am not suggesting that this council that's currently constituted would do that. |
04:16:35.58 | Mark Wolf | I am saying that happens very, very frequently. What we are doing is, |
04:16:40.34 | Mark Wolf | is ensuring that there will be a vote of the people. And this is, I think, four months from now. And in that four-month period, there can be robust debates |
04:16:49.20 | Mark Wolf | There can be op-eds, there can be |
04:16:51.02 | Mark Wolf | ballot arguments in the pamphlets that people receive in the mail. There can be public forums. There can be a thorough vetting. |
04:16:58.13 | Mark Wolf | And so that is what we are asking people to do here. |
04:17:00.46 | Mayor Sobieski | John DeRay. |
04:17:09.62 | John DeRay | Thank you. My name is John DeRay. I'm with the Working Waterfront Coalition. |
04:17:15.04 | John DeRay | At the Working Waterfront Coalition, our experience is that the marineship is at risk. Noncompliant, nonconforming uses have driven up lease rates in the marineship. |
04:17:24.57 | John DeRay | and conversion of industrial space to office has been rampant. Sausalito Industrial... |
04:17:30.21 | John DeRay | Lease rate is double the average for Marin. |
04:17:34.02 | John DeRay | The Working Waterfront Coalition gets inquiries from companies about looking for space. We connect them with landlords. |
04:17:40.05 | John DeRay | but mostly they cannot afford the spaces. |
04:17:42.46 | John DeRay | And there are spaces available. |
04:17:44.53 | John DeRay | Some |
04:17:45.73 | John DeRay | purposely left vacant as part of a rezoning strategy. |
04:17:48.95 | John DeRay | The intent of the ballot measure is to foster and grow what remains of the industrial maritime and art activities |
04:17:55.96 | John DeRay | By working within the marineship vision established by the general plan, |
04:18:01.73 | John DeRay | three and a half years. |
04:18:03.62 | John DeRay | two meetings per month passed in 2022. Tremendous amount of public input. |
04:18:10.32 | John DeRay | Many of the people in this room were not at one of those meetings. |
04:18:14.62 | John DeRay | I was on the general plan advisory committee. |
04:18:18.15 | John DeRay | Our approach was to codify the general plan |
04:18:22.64 | John DeRay | Uh, |
04:18:23.58 | John DeRay | essential to maintaining working waterfront that can accommodate a new |
04:18:27.92 | John DeRay | ocean-based. |
04:18:29.30 | John DeRay | Blue Economy Zone. |
04:18:31.46 | John DeRay | which was also presented in the general plan process. |
04:18:35.09 | John DeRay | The measure does not cover approximately 18 acres of Northern Marinship along Bridgeway. They can be rezoned to a mixed use commercial |
04:18:43.36 | John DeRay | zone that |
04:18:44.44 | John DeRay | can accommodate any kind of use. |
04:18:46.58 | John DeRay | All current uses in the marineship, including nonconforming, can remain even when a new business occupies a space. |
04:18:52.94 | John DeRay | These legacy businesses remain. |
04:18:55.58 | John DeRay | And also the new mixed-use district, depending on the city's zoning, will be open to all the ancillary uses. |
04:19:02.45 | John DeRay | We look forward to |
04:19:04.83 | John DeRay | Seeing this go to the voters, please move forward and let the voters decide. Thank you. |
04:19:11.84 | Mayor Sobieski | Sharna Brockett. |
04:19:20.72 | Sharna Brockett | I'm sure to bracket and I'm a 12 year resident. I just really wanna employ you to not bring this initiative back to the city council in July, when many people are on vacation. Plus 45 days is really not sufficient to create a master plan and actually do the proper land use. |
04:19:40.40 | Sharna Brockett | to have the proper land use practices put in place for the future of this very important, valuable, historic and vibrant waterfront. |
04:19:47.38 | Sharna Brockett | There needs to be a meaningful working group. |
04:19:50.27 | Sharna Brockett | put together with the major stakeholders, many in this room who were not included, to help define what we are going to do with the marineship. |
04:19:58.69 | Sharna Brockett | We want |
04:20:00.55 | Sharna Brockett | you know, we want to define, sorry, I'm trying to talk here. We want a viable plan that works for all of the marineship and not just a few. So I just really wanna highlight that. And then I also wanna highlight, I went through all the letters, and I think there's some confusion among some of the businesses who signed on to support this initiative. For example, there's a skincare manufacturer who has a letter in support of the initiative, |
04:20:25.91 | Sharna Brockett | And the letter talks about how the MIRN ship has enabled the company's operation to innovate and grow. |
04:20:32.44 | Sharna Brockett | But unfortunately, this initiative doesn't include skin care manufacturers. It's only for maritime manufacturers. So this would become a legal nonconforming use, which would mean that it would be very hard for them to expand their operations or to modify their space. It would also be very hard to sell this business because nobody wants to purchase a legal nonconforming business or for them to get loans and insurance. So, so much for innovating and growing. And I don't think this person knew that. And there's another one, an entrepreneur who makes bags out of old sale cloth. The same thing. This would not be a permitted use for future entrepreneurs like her. There's an auto repair shop also sending us a letter of support. Didn't know that, no, you wouldn't be included in this. Sure, you could stay. You'd be grandfathered in, but you'd still be this legal nonconforming. Anyways, you get the idea. So we really need to take this back to the drawing board. Thank you. |
04:21:26.05 | Mayor Sobieski | Alice Merrill, then followed by Carly Tilburg. |
04:21:35.94 | Alice Merrill | Hello, everybody. I'm going to start by saying that the fact that the marineship specific plan is no longer |
04:21:45.46 | Alice Merrill | part of the general plan is what worries me. Why did that get written off? Because in the way I see it, it's because the landowners, a lot of them, |
04:21:58.35 | Alice Merrill | don't want it. They don't want those restrictions. |
04:22:03.01 | Alice Merrill | And if we had kept |
04:22:05.56 | Alice Merrill | We, as a city, had managed to keep the marineship-specific plan, which was in place for 30-plus years. However, it was not abided by. Lots and lots of things have been in that shouldn't have been there for that. So we had a problem. |
04:22:24.71 | Alice Merrill | Because that was a good thing, and it's the only reason that we have a good, strong group and economy down there, because it was left alone. And... |
04:22:35.73 | Alice Merrill | Some of the landowners, one person said to me, I don't like, it's not very pretty. I said, well, the landowner cut down all the trees. They wanted it to be not very pretty. You know, so you would say, well, let's do something else with it. The RBMA started by my father. This, he would 100% be behind this. And the RBMA would be great to be involved in this. |
04:23:06.19 | Alice Merrill | That would be great. |
04:23:08.72 | Alice Merrill | I think that we need to work together. It's true. I think that there are people that's bringing up subjects for people who didn't really haven't talked to each other. I talked to some people tonight that I didn't before. And I think that that's good. I do recommend that we have some counselors and mediators, people who can keep the conversations going. And I also would love it if we would take some of those things off the shelf that have been done before. Thank you. |
04:23:41.39 | Mayor Sobieski | Riley Tobberg, then followed by Lorraine Gurnard. |
04:23:54.77 | Riley Tobberg | Hey everybody, your local evil developer here. Nice to see y'all. |
04:24:00.42 | Riley Tobberg | empty buildings abound. |
04:24:02.16 | Riley Tobberg | Um, |
04:24:04.37 | Riley Tobberg | I was sort of thinking about what to say tonight, and I was reading this book by this guy that lived on – |
04:24:12.86 | Riley Tobberg | on Varta landing. Excuse me. Jeez. Got a frog in my throat. Um, |
04:24:12.93 | Unknown | on Vardaland. |
04:24:13.86 | Unknown | Peace. |
04:24:16.96 | Riley Tobberg | And his name was Alan Watts and he was a Zen guy. And he had this great story about a monk who was, you know, in his monastery in the middle of winter and it was too noisy and he wanted to go meditate. So he rode out to the middle of a lake. |
04:24:30.73 | Riley Tobberg | And he sat there and he was just about to attain enlightenment |
04:24:34.38 | Riley Tobberg | when this boat comes along and hits him. |
04:24:36.86 | Riley Tobberg | And he turns around, he's pissed off, he's ready to yell at the captain of the boat that hit him. And he realizes it was just the wind that had blown the boat into him. And I think we're all at a point where we're in various stages of that same journey, whether we're, |
04:24:55.08 | Riley Tobberg | turning around and looking for that that imaginary captain that wronged us, whether we're realizing the anger is from within or |
04:25:04.33 | Riley Tobberg | or whether we're thinking about all the events that had to take place to blow that boat into us, we're here. And the question is, how are we gonna move forward? |
04:25:14.22 | Riley Tobberg | For me, you know, there's lots of things to talk about that are specific to the initiative. There's lots of facts we could talk about, but at, at the end of the day. |
04:25:26.00 | Riley Tobberg | you know, this is something that we're not going to solve in 45 days. This is something that we're going to solve with a collaborative effort with everyone together sitting down in a room, hopefully getting some some beer and Cheetos and and making it work. So, you know, I'm here for that. And I hope other folks are. Thanks very much. Don't move this forward. |
04:25:49.54 | Mayor Sobieski | Doreen Gunard then followed by Rupert Hansen. |
04:26:00.86 | Doreen Gunnar | Hello, I'm Doreen Gunnar. I am a 30 year resident. |
04:26:05.47 | Doreen Gunnar | At Galley Harbor, the beginning of the Marin ship, actually, the southernmost point of the Marin ship. I've been living there, raised my children, and continued to reside there on my boat, my sailboat. |
04:26:21.36 | Doreen Gunnar | I think that the, |
04:26:22.90 | Doreen Gunnar | The problem with this measure |
04:26:25.25 | Doreen Gunnar | is that it is a measure. |
04:26:26.68 | Doreen Gunnar | And we're talking about land use. |
04:26:28.81 | Doreen Gunnar | And land use is so complicated and has so many |
04:26:33.60 | Doreen Gunnar | ways that it could, the unintended consequences are all in there. |
04:26:40.92 | Doreen Gunnar | As I was reading this thing, I kept saying, oh, well, what about if this happens? And what about if that happens? It just felt really. |
04:26:47.66 | Doreen Gunnar | it's kind of a clunky way to do |
04:26:50.07 | Doreen Gunnar | to make land use decisions, I think, is through a measure. I don't think that it's appropriate. |
04:26:57.86 | Doreen Gunnar | This is going to take a real collaborative effort in our town to resolve this. And I... |
04:27:04.53 | Doreen Gunnar | I have a real problem with a measure because you can't, you guys can't amend the measure. Once, if it gets passed, you're stuck with it. You guys had the same conversation when we were talking about the, the cannabis issues last go around when these measures popped up. And I heard you all. |
04:27:22.69 | Doreen Gunnar | come to the conclusion that it was really a difficult thing to do because there's nothing you can do to it if it gets passed. |
04:27:30.60 | Doreen Gunnar | So, |
04:27:31.36 | Doreen Gunnar | Those are the kinds of things that I think that we need to think about. You got to think a little harder. |
04:27:36.81 | Doreen Gunnar | This feels like a little bit of an Enron. |
04:27:39.31 | Doreen Gunnar | without including all the stakeholders. |
04:27:42.57 | Doreen Gunnar | And that is an impossible position going forward. I just don't think you're going to be able to, you know, for this to resolve itself in a good way where we all can be there together and feel like, okay, we worked it out. I think that is possible, but not with this measure. |
04:27:59.05 | Doreen Gunnar | Thank you. |
04:28:01.97 | Mayor Sobieski | Rupert Hanson followed by Lee Hunt. |
04:28:13.58 | Rupert Hanson | I'm Rupert Hanson. I'm with Cox Wooten and I represent Silver Seas Yachts. |
04:28:21.43 | Rupert Hanson | The president of Silver Seas learned about this measure 48 hours ago. Silver Seas is one of the largest yacht brokers in this area in Marinship. They are the primary tenant out of Clipper Yacht. They are the largest or one of the largest people groups that is working with KKMI and many other stakeholders. |
04:28:58.30 | Rupert Hanson | And they |
04:29:03.18 | Rupert Hanson | they were not aware of this at all. The measure says that yacht brokers aren't necessary to be by the water. Well, I've been a maritime lawyer for 44 years. |
04:29:17.51 | Rupert Hanson | And every yacht broker except one has been by the water. And I mean, I represented both for and against yacht brokers. And they're by the water. |
04:29:37.52 | Rupert Hanson | if this |
04:29:41.65 | Rupert Hanson | passes. |
04:29:43.43 | Rupert Hanson | in its form that it currently is. |
04:29:47.78 | Rupert Hanson | it is going to displace the entire network because it's not just the yacht brokers or the KKMI. |
04:29:57.15 | Rupert Hanson | It's the whole network |
04:30:02.31 | Rupert Hanson | of companies that are involved in maritime. And this idea that you |
04:30:09.23 | Rupert Hanson | have to have some direct involvement with the water |
04:30:13.18 | Rupert Hanson | To be maritime is nonsense. |
04:30:15.73 | Rupert Hanson | Thank you. |
04:30:18.69 | Rupert Hanson | And Leehan? |
04:30:19.57 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
04:30:28.87 | Lee Hunt | Good evening. |
04:30:31.43 | Lee Hunt | I represent Modern Sailing School and Club. |
04:30:35.81 | Lee Hunt | Modern brings about a thousand people |
04:30:39.38 | Lee Hunt | to the waterfront every year to do sailing lessons and rent boats. |
04:30:45.69 | Lee Hunt | And we're a really good example of |
04:30:48.97 | Lee Hunt | A maritime... |
04:30:50.54 | Lee Hunt | ecosystem business |
04:30:52.72 | Lee Hunt | I take my boats to Lisp Marine to get serviced. I bring my boats to Spalding to get hauled out, bottom painted. So the people who are spending money at my business help Spalding. |
04:31:10.42 | Lee Hunt | help Lisp Marine, help the ecosystem. |
04:31:15.04 | Lee Hunt | And... |
04:31:16.19 | Lee Hunt | The people who spend money at my business, my business, Aide Spalding, |
04:31:20.83 | Lee Hunt | My business is aided. |
04:31:23.09 | Lee Hunt | by fish, by Le Garage, by all of the other things that make Sausalito's waterfront interesting and fun. |
04:31:33.70 | Lee Hunt | And |
04:31:34.83 | Lee Hunt | I believe that's the ecosystem that we need to be aspiring to. |
04:31:39.48 | Lee Hunt | And I'm asking you |
04:31:41.70 | Lee Hunt | Tonight... |
04:31:42.92 | Lee Hunt | not to legislate |
04:31:45.50 | Lee Hunt | restriction. |
04:31:46.68 | Lee Hunt | not to legislate exclusion. Let's |
04:31:50.97 | Lee Hunt | empower the community to build a better ecosystem. And this initiative is not the way to do it. |
04:31:60.00 | Lee Hunt | Thank you. |
04:32:03.15 | Mayor Sobieski | Okay, and then on Zoom we have Gabe Turner. |
04:32:09.58 | Gabe Turner | Hi there. |
04:32:11.20 | Gabe Turner | Can you hear me? |
04:32:12.72 | Gabe Turner | Thank you. |
04:32:12.74 | Mayor Sobieski | you know, |
04:32:12.79 | Gabe Turner | Yeah. |
04:32:12.94 | Gabe Turner | Can you hear me? Sorry about that. |
04:32:15.54 | Gabe Turner | Wilfred, can you hear me? |
04:32:16.75 | Mayor Sobieski | Yeah, we can hear you. |
04:32:17.93 | Gabe Turner | Okay, great. |
04:32:18.81 | Gabe Turner | Hey, guys. Gabe Turner here. I'm one of the co-owners of Township. |
04:32:22.07 | Gabe Turner | which I think many of the council members have been to and visited our members. We're a neighborhood clubhouse. |
04:32:27.35 | Gabe Turner | We have been kind of a haven for a lot of the folks who've been working from home before this, during the pandemic, what have you, and now have a community center to go to get work done, socialize, meet their neighbors. And frankly, the blue economy that we speak of in this initiative, |
04:32:44.50 | Gabe Turner | Really, those companies are going to solve our climate change problems, are going to be the next great sort of blue economy business, are likely going to be created in places like Township. And I know many of these entrepreneurs. I know an ocean tech accelerator. I was down in San Mateo, built something called Draper Hero City, which was another accelerator of these types of ocean tech businesses that this very measure speaks of. And these type of people meet at places like Township. And guess what? Township would not be able to exist in the Marineship if this passes. |
04:33:16.13 | Gabe Turner | And so this concerns me, much like the gentleman from Modern Sailing was saying, we're trying to create an ecosystem. And these future founders, these future ocean businesses will want to be in a place that has a diverse offering, that has restaurants, that has recreation, that has marine-based businesses and industrial businesses. And it's got to exist within that very ecosystem he spoke of. And so I really hope you take that into account that we, if we really want this place to thrive going forward and we want these industrial businesses to exist, they've got to really encompass a whole bunch of businesses and a whole bunch of folks that want to live and create businesses in this thriving economy. And so really encourage you to not pass this, not rush this through in 45 days. And anyways, hope to see you all at Township again soon. |
04:34:05.16 | Gabe Turner | Thank you. |
04:34:09.81 | Mayor Sobieski | All right. We do have some people in the audience. Peter Van Meter. |
04:34:21.34 | Peter Van Meter | Thank you. Yes, I did put in a slip to speak. There's really one issue that kind of overrides everything here. You've heard a lot of plus and minus discussion about the initiative itself. |
04:34:31.50 | Peter Van Meter | But the council should not be a party to putting any measure on a ballot. |
04:34:37.02 | Peter Van Meter | whether sponsored or |
04:34:38.37 | Peter Van Meter | When it comes back in after signatures and you have a choice of either going to an election |
04:34:42.52 | Peter Van Meter | We're adopting it. |
04:34:43.82 | Peter Van Meter | or most of all, creating a motion of your own. |
04:34:48.61 | Peter Van Meter | because then it becomes impossible to overturn. Basically, it becomes so difficult, costly, |
04:34:54.92 | Peter Van Meter | Thank you. |
04:34:55.58 | Peter Van Meter | get rid of an initiative. It has to go to a public vote. So like they say six times in the draft initiative, |
04:35:02.06 | Peter Van Meter | They want to have it go to a public vote. They specifically call out the fact that the council should not be able to make any modifications to this. You're living right now under the yoke of a couple of initiatives. |
04:35:14.19 | Peter Van Meter | 10-22, 11-28. |
04:35:16.62 | Peter Van Meter | I mean, there's, |
04:35:17.55 | Peter Van Meter | been things that you would like to do, little tweaks. You know, we'd have 18 more parking spaces if we're able to go six feet into Gabrielsen Park. |
04:35:25.15 | Peter Van Meter | as an example, because you can't make little tweaks like that because it has to go to a vote. So you don't wanna lock this in forever. It's not the way to do land use planning. |
04:35:35.08 | Peter Van Meter | Doreen said it much better than I. |
04:35:37.48 | Peter Van Meter | She was very eloquent, but do not take any action on this. |
04:35:43.28 | Peter Van Meter | Ever. |
04:35:45.23 | Peter Van Meter | It's that simple. |
04:35:47.88 | Peter Van Meter | Let them get the signatures. |
04:35:49.55 | Peter Van Meter | Let them go take it out to a vote. |
04:35:52.77 | Peter Van Meter | That's what the initiative process is all about. |
04:35:54.85 | Peter Van Meter | Don't take any action at all. |
04:35:58.03 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
04:36:00.82 | Mayor Sobieski | Lauren DeRammer? |
04:36:12.72 | Lauren Dreamer | My name is Lauren Dreamer. I won't go too into who I am. You guys mostly know me. I already sent a letter. Everybody knows how I feel about the waterfront. I've lived in Saussee my whole life and I've worked in Maritime as well as restaurant hospitality across town. |
04:36:28.02 | Lauren Dreamer | Thank you. |
04:36:28.07 | Lauren Dreamer | And one thing that is just maddening to me is that this had to come from the Working Waterfront Coalition. |
04:36:34.67 | Lauren Dreamer | living here my whole life, I'm constantly frustrated that this isn't coming from city council. This isn't coming from |
04:36:40.90 | Lauren Dreamer | local community and quite frankly the one thing that nobody's said so far that i do |
04:36:45.23 | Lauren Dreamer | You know, I've volunteered in some capacities. I did not work on this initiative, but I've volunteered in some capacities for the Working Waterfront as a professional mariner, and they put it together. And quite frankly, I do think this type of thing, regardless of what happens tonight, |
04:36:58.36 | Lauren Dreamer | is a step in the right direction because I don't know who's coming after you. |
04:37:02.78 | Lauren Dreamer | And quite frankly, I'm really sick and tired of talking about zoning. I swear to God, if somebody mentioned zoning again, I'm going to beat my head against the wall. Because I feel like we can do a lot with marinship with what the zoning currently is. And I think instead of talking about defending it and saving it or... |
04:37:19.37 | Lauren Dreamer | defending it or, you know, developing it, we should be talking about fixing it. We should be talking about how can we invest in it? How can we feed the lifeblood of our town and focus on maritime, which is the heart of |
04:37:32.18 | Lauren Dreamer | you know, the houseboats and art and everything else that makes our town great. And |
04:37:38.26 | Lauren Dreamer | The other thing that I think that |
04:37:40.55 | Lauren Dreamer | is really important is that we, |
04:37:42.46 | Lauren Dreamer | Trust each other. I think trust is a huge thing. I have a lot of people that even agree are working in silos. |
04:37:47.74 | Lauren Dreamer | And I think that anybody here who has a problem with this |
04:37:50.72 | Lauren Dreamer | needs to get involved in the working waterfront. People at the working waterfront need to meet with other people. I think all of us need to be talking a lot more than just city council meetings. |
04:37:59.79 | Lauren Dreamer | And I'm talking about all the businesses too. You know, I think we're really busy in the summertime. And I think there's a lot of people that want to be involved at Campy. And we need to have another platform for that. |
04:38:08.34 | Lauren Dreamer | So thank you. |
04:38:10.92 | Mayor Sobieski | William Foss. |
04:38:21.81 | William Foss | Hello there. So I'm William Bill Foss. I'm a half owner of Fish Restaurant, also known as Caruso's LLC for those around long enough to remember Caruso's. |
04:38:33.05 | William Foss | Rather than talk about how this affects our restaurant, I wanted to defend the people that aren't in the room. When we opened the restaurant, there were 12 commercial fishing boats in Clipper. There are now four. |
04:38:47.02 | William Foss | Climate change has caused domoic acid uprising in the ocean, shutting down the crapping season for these guys, which is economic disaster for them. The issue of water and hydroelectric damming of rivers has now created a second year of salmon closures. So our most noble working waterfront is the fishermen. |
04:39:09.95 | William Foss | and we are silently ignoring them and letting them die. |
04:39:13.77 | William Foss | in a land of over-regulation and they're being forced to, they just can't survive. |
04:39:19.66 | William Foss | So they were not consulted at all in this event, in this, this. |
04:39:25.19 | William Foss | this document we're discussing right now, nor were we as a restaurant. |
04:39:28.70 | William Foss | We proudly support and buy from them. |
04:39:31.33 | William Foss | You know, in a fantasy land, it would be lovely to have an open air fish market down there where they could actually sell directly to consumers. |
04:39:38.51 | William Foss | But if we're talking about the working waterfront, |
04:39:41.38 | William Foss | Guys, we got to remember the fishermen because they work harder than anyone. |
04:39:44.95 | William Foss | And they are completely unrepresented here. |
04:39:48.06 | William Foss | Thank you. |
04:39:50.22 | Mayor Sobieski | John Coletti. |
04:40:00.76 | John Coletti | Good evening, and I appreciate everybody's good suggestions and comments. This is a good discussion. I think this is what our community needs to have more conversations. |
04:40:09.83 | John Coletti | due to the lack of direction given |
04:40:12.80 | John Coletti | for the Marine. |
04:40:14.77 | John Coletti | Rinship. |
04:40:16.12 | John Coletti | I think that's something that's been done. I was a little disappointed at the petty politics that the council members were playing early on. And so I think the community should be a little bit more representative |
04:40:26.51 | John Coletti | of the professionalism that we all want to have. |
04:40:29.65 | John Coletti | But I think the |
04:40:32.05 | John Coletti | Discussion on the Marin ship is something that we need to do. |
04:40:35.90 | John Coletti | thoroughly and it needs to be done. I think the comments tonight showed that there isn't a direction to have, so we have to make our own. I think this is a very good step. The Working Waterfront Coalition did to get a good start. I think there's a lot more that can be done to make that one a much better program. So I urge the direction to modify the initiative and maybe present it further for this election or for a coming election. |
04:40:52.72 | Katie Thau Garcia | So. |
04:41:03.91 | John Coletti | Thank you. |
04:41:08.77 | Mayor Sobieski | And on Zoom, we have Sammy. |
04:41:18.56 | Sammy | Can everybody hear me? |
04:41:20.21 | Unknown | Yes, we can. Please go right ahead. |
04:41:22.57 | Sammy | So it wasn't that long ago that I was studying economics and a diverse economy is a healthy economy. In Sausalito's case, we have a valuable, historic, vibrant, and could be internationally renowned for being a blue economy and supporting our current businesses that we have, as well as inviting additional businesses. We have the current resources, smart, disciplined people. This would require minimal risk with maximum returns for the city. We would keep and improve our business district, lower our financial deficit, |
04:41:58.57 | Sammy | and take advantage of our assets. |
04:42:01.39 | Sammy | This would be providing important tax dollars and a diverse economy. |
04:42:06.28 | Sammy | I read the San Francisco Chronicle article recently, and it was obvious that whoever spoon-fed the author is not thinking clearly about Sausalito's potential revenue streams. This could be come from supporting businesses. |
04:42:21.23 | Sammy | Sausalito is unique, not like other Marin towns or other shore towns, and we should not thrive to be the other towns, we should keep thriving to be unique. I think what Alice Merrill and Lauren Dramer said was absolutely fantastic. |
04:42:39.74 | Sammy | The residents are incredible here. The business owners are amazing. We have generated numerous patents, incredible ideas and projects that we can rely on forever. |
04:42:52.45 | Sammy | Our unfair competitive advantage that Sausalito has is our ability to nurture our blue economy and our industrial district. |
04:43:02.47 | Sammy | Our planners and neighbors have the ability to make sound economic decisions. This should go to vote. Let's nurture the vitality of Sausalito and increase revenue to the city by fostering blue tech and blue economy businesses. There are plenty of businesses here already and let's increase that community to lower the city's deficit. |
04:43:26.56 | Mayor Sobieski | Darian Culligan? |
04:43:35.78 | Councilman McCullough | Hi there, Kieran Culligan, Salcedo resident. |
04:43:38.65 | Councilman McCullough | I got pretty excited actually when I saw something called Blue Economy Innovation. And I spent 20 years working in the field of innovation. I've worked for some of the most storied shipyards on the East Coast on innovation strategies. We didn't have buzzwords like Blue Economy back then, but that's exactly what it was. And today I actually work with a number of different projects, but two in particular that are focused. |
04:44:08.67 | Councilman McCullough | on the blue economy. |
04:44:10.36 | Councilman McCullough | Once public, one is still under wraps. |
04:44:13.50 | Councilman McCullough | In this time, I've seen many different levers for increasing innovation, allowing for new uses, economic incentives, new infrastructure, reduced bureaucracy, the list goes on. And innovation, it's increasingly multidisciplinary. So what's the difference between blue economy and robotics and computer science and computer fluid dynamic simulations, satellite imagery, like it all blurs. And startups pivot, they serve multiple markets. And I worry that the measure does nothing to embrace that if that's really what it's supposed to aim at. So to put it politely, I've never seen a measure like this that is designed to promote innovation. Legislative restriction, as someone called it. |
04:44:55.62 | Councilman McCullough | And I, you know, prove me wrong. Show me the financial models. Show me letters of intent, project plans. That's going to do that. But barring that, the vibes are off on the process and the content. Let's do this right. 45 days is not enough. |
04:45:13.73 | Mayor Sobieski | Okay, next speaker is Leo. |
04:45:24.14 | SPEAKER_25 | Can you hear me? |
04:45:25.47 | SPEAKER_25 | Yes. |
04:45:26.64 | SPEAKER_25 | Well, great. |
04:45:27.40 | SPEAKER_25 | Yeah, I just wanted to be pretty brief. And I'm a Sausalito resident and artist. And, you know, I think that having it outlined the two ways that any ballot initiative could be presented is great. I think it's very ironic that everyone who is afraid of the council kind of just putting this on without any say and wanting signatures when signatures is one of the easiest ways for the council to simply put on a measure without consulting the residents. I think having the |
04:46:09.06 | SPEAKER_25 | The opportunity for all residents to have an actual vote and say on any initiative or any ballot is great. And I think that, you know, allow the people to have a chance to actually vote on something and not leave it up to five people. |
04:46:27.67 | SPEAKER_25 | that are just sitting in front of everyone. So yeah, thank you for your time. |
04:46:38.96 | Mayor Sobieski | And Scott Thornburg. |
04:46:43.97 | Scott Thornburg | Good evening, counsel. I just, from an EDAC perspective, I just wanted to reiterate my comments that I put in our letter. |
04:46:50.76 | Scott Thornburg | We have not had an opportunity to weigh in. And though I applaud our members that are also members of the Working Waterfront for bringing this forward |
04:46:59.40 | Scott Thornburg | in an effort to support the Marineship, I do think we would love an opportunity to weigh in |
04:47:04.33 | Scott Thornburg | I think the rest of our Blue Economy Innovation Subcommittee |
04:47:09.15 | Scott Thornburg | would love an opportunity to weigh in. |
04:47:11.58 | Scott Thornburg | So just a flag that we would like to be part of that process. |
04:47:17.49 | Scott Thornburg | And then separately, I think it would be really great to see what the actual economic impact of this would be. |
04:47:24.61 | Scott Thornburg | And from my personal perspective, |
04:47:28.09 | Scott Thornburg | that piece is missing here. I don't think we have clarity yet. There were differing comments tonight on which types of businesses might be affected and which would not. That's concerning to me. I don't know that we're gonna be able to get consensus in the next 45 days. The one thing I will say though, I'm really encouraged |
04:47:47.38 | Scott Thornburg | by this showing of support tonight. I mean, we really kicked the hornet's nest here this evening and I think we have a really robust discussion happening involving a lot of different people. And I hope we will keep that going because I do believe we can come to |
04:48:02.71 | Scott Thornburg | consensus as a community. And I think that process is gonna take time |
04:48:07.69 | Scott Thornburg | But I hope that we would all be committed to doing that in a way that we can protect our waterfront |
04:48:14.17 | Scott Thornburg | And |
04:48:15.17 | Scott Thornburg | have a waterfront that is not just a working waterfront, but a waterfront that works for Sausalito. |
04:48:20.28 | Scott Thornburg | And I believe we can get to that as a community with the proper time |
04:48:24.50 | Scott Thornburg | to go through that process. So thank you for your attention to this tonight. |
04:48:32.62 | Mayor Sobieski | Okay. |
04:48:32.94 | Scott Thornburg | Sandra Bushmuth. |
04:48:33.97 | Mayor Sobieski | maker. |
04:48:37.24 | Sandra Bushmuth | Hi, everybody. I just wanted to comment on the idea of |
04:48:41.69 | Sandra Bushmuth | an initiative going to the voters. |
04:48:44.19 | Sandra Bushmuth | What better way to prove a democracy than to let the voters vote? |
04:48:48.85 | Sandra Bushmuth | And, |
04:48:49.85 | Sandra Bushmuth | Just keep in mind, everybody, that |
04:48:52.19 | Sandra Bushmuth | The city council has the authority to modify a general plan and believe me, I sat through all the general plan meetings and the housing element meetings myself. |
04:49:01.52 | Sandra Bushmuth | but they can modify. |
04:49:03.13 | Sandra Bushmuth | Without public hearing, excuse me, I misspoke. |
04:49:06.67 | Sandra Bushmuth | They can modify without public vote |
04:49:09.00 | Sandra Bushmuth | The general plan four times a year. |
04:49:12.15 | Sandra Bushmuth | So the notion of having an initiative that allows the people of Sausalito to make a land use decision to me is a great thing. |
04:49:19.80 | Sandra Bushmuth | And I hope we can come together |
04:49:21.71 | Sandra Bushmuth | on the details so that we can make that decision. |
04:49:24.88 | Sandra Bushmuth | as a populace, as a sign of democracy and not autocracy. |
04:49:29.74 | Sandra Bushmuth | Thank you. |
04:49:36.67 | Mayor Sobieski | Charles Melton. |
04:49:42.94 | Charles Meltzen | Charles Meltzen, I really appreciate the robust conversation tonight and the dialogue that this has created our community. It's great to see such vibrancy and people coming out in regards to this issue. I think we all agree that the ownership is a very vital, important part of our community and we need to get this done right. I agree, democracy is important. What better way to get voters to express their opinion? Through voting. But yet, our city council has a responsibility to make sure that initiatives and ballot measures that the city council is putting before voters are vetted, are examined, are evaluated, and have a robust public process. That is not what is occurring with this process here. This process is being shoehorned in by an independent group with an attorney from San Francisco with language borrowed from Morro Bay, California, to put this to city council and to ask for action to take place within 45 days. Democracy is slow. Democracy is painful. |
04:50:47.03 | Charles Meltzen | That's the process. And I know our city council's city counselors are the most thoughtful people in the room. Many of them have served as mayor. All of them have served as mayor at one point. |
04:50:57.79 | Charles Meltzen | During their time as mayor, |
04:50:59.65 | Charles Meltzen | Has any initiative, big initiative they've taken, taken less than 45 days? If it's a homeless encampment, if it's a tax measure to raise the TOT tax on hotels, if it's working on the marineship or putting in a ferry landing in downtown Sausalito, how many of those processes occurred within under 45 days? That expressed the critical nature of this. So yes, democracy is slow. Let's have the voters speak about it. But as a government, let's do our due diligence and make sure that what's being put before the voters is accurate, is factual, we can show the economic impact, and most of all, that everyone has a voice in what's going forward on that ballot. That is the role of our city council. Make sure everyone has a voice. And I'm asking for you not to rush that process and to do it with diligence. Thank you. |
04:51:50.73 | Mayor Sobieski | No further public comments. |
04:51:52.96 | Unknown | Okay, thank you. We will close public comment and bring it back up for discussion here on the dais. Maybe I'll start. |
04:52:04.40 | Unknown | Mm-hmm. |
04:52:07.12 | Unknown | I want to avoid rancor. |
04:52:10.22 | Unknown | When I first joined on the city council, I said, we need to start talking with each other. |
04:52:14.79 | Unknown | there was the issue of a housing overlay in the Marin ship. And when I, it was a hard vote, I voted for it and I got a bunch of text messages that I was in the developer's pocket. Okay. |
04:52:23.85 | Unknown | Thank you very much. Can you have it now? Thank you. It's like Verizon. |
04:52:27.70 | Unknown | So I said I went to a very blanker. When I first joined the city council, there was a issue of a housing overlay in the internship. And as soon as I voted for it, I got a bunch of text messages that I was in the developer's pocket. No one thing is, you know, it defines you. This is... |
04:52:47.65 | Unknown | I'm worried that the way this came about, and if it gets put on the, if the city council elects to put on the ballot, it will divide the community and actually prevent the kind of dialogue that we're talking about. Democracy is slow, slower than I like, but... |
04:53:03.11 | Unknown | We need that kind of dialogue. My friend, Lauren, I was really struck by your comments. And I just wanted to say, I think a lot of people missed that on May 23rd, 2023, the city council in this room |
04:53:16.86 | Unknown | Considered a proposal from Community Venture Partners. Community Venture Partners is a 501C3, non-profit charitable organization based in Mill Valley, supported by donations from individuals and non-profit foundations. CVP provides a broad range of free services, technical advice and other assistance to community groups and local initiatives. The stated mission is to bring the community's voice to government decision-making on issues about city planning and affordable housing. |
04:53:45.50 | Unknown | in early 2019. |
04:53:47.52 | Unknown | The Sausalito Working Waterfront Coalition requested their assistance to begin at three years of meetings and discussions with a variety of stakeholders and community groups about the future of Sausalito's friendship. |
04:53:57.75 | Unknown | In particular, they focused on the preservation of the marine ships maritime industries and assessment of affordable housing development opportunities and participated in the general plan discussion. |
04:54:08.31 | Unknown | At that meeting in May of 2023, we had the opportunity to hire for $25,000 |
04:54:15.40 | Unknown | CVP to go and engage in a multi-phase approach where they would raise additional money from charitable, |
04:54:23.26 | Unknown | from many sources to conduct a five-phase operation. Phase one, public outreach. Phase two, due diligence and asset assessment. Phase three, conceptual planning and design. Phase four, design development and planning level engineering. And finally, phase five, final planning documents. |
04:54:41.60 | Unknown | This was exactly the process we're talking about. |
04:54:44.41 | Unknown | of outreach, collaboration, bringing people together, putting them in the same room. |
04:54:49.30 | Unknown | hashing out all the land use details. And this council chose not to do that by a narrow vote. |
04:54:54.55 | Unknown | I call on the council to do that or a version of it. It doesn't have to be with CBP, but someone said about getting everyone together with some good food and some wine in one room. The problem is that didn't happen. Obviously there are dozens of eight or 86 letters. |
04:55:09.20 | Unknown | saying in opposition to this 56 in favor. Interestingly, not a single one in opposition disagreed with the goals of the Working Waterfront Coalition, not a single one. And I agree with every single one of their goals. |
04:55:22.98 | Unknown | Spalding Boat Works is where I had my 50th birthday party. I love that place. I have two boats, I'm happy to say, a motorboat and a sailboat. I love the maritime. I grew up on the water. |
04:55:34.83 | Unknown | I love it. |
04:55:35.86 | Unknown | But I'm also a money guy, as some of you know. And I know that if you want to preserve an artisan activity like wooden boat building, you probably need to innovate in your economic model. |
04:55:46.49 | Unknown | And that's possible, but it requires a trade-off. It requires a quid pro quo, a deal, and we have tools to that. In government, we have a thing called a community development agreement. |
04:55:55.30 | Unknown | That's an actual agreement with a property owner that they would |
04:55:58.20 | Unknown | Do something for the community benefit in exchange for a benefit. It is a trade. It needs to be negotiated. |
04:56:03.63 | Unknown | and the Working Waterfront Coalition and other interested parties could be the legitimate, authentic counterparty to that negotiation with the property. |
04:56:11.04 | Unknown | They need to get in the same room. |
04:56:12.54 | Unknown | to do that. |
04:56:13.94 | Unknown | They need to have a forum to do that. They need a mediator to do that. Someone to first do a trust building exercise where everyone can see their favorite animal and learn to trust one another before they talk about these hard things. And that's the process that we could have done a year ago, kicked off with a credible character person who had brought an interesting set of support in the community. |
04:56:42.51 | Unknown | this process with this, uh, |
04:56:45.40 | Unknown | with this ballot initiative at the last second, runs completely counter to what one of my colleagues here on the council said about Measure K. Measure K, that's the ballot initiative that actually got 500 signatures. |
04:56:56.98 | Unknown | not how Sausalito does business. We don't cut corners or push efforts that try to avoid meaningful public input. |
04:57:05.03 | Unknown | This feels that way. |
04:57:05.24 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
04:57:05.30 | Charles Meltzen | feels that way. |
04:57:05.58 | Katie Thau Garcia | Yeah. |
04:57:06.75 | Unknown | I call, I would love to, I can announce it now. I don't know whether it would work to have a mayor's blue ribbon committee with two people from the Working Waterfront Coalition, the owner of Clipper, the owner of Schoonmaker, Reason Bradley, and nominees of a couple other people that can actually really care and love about the marinship to get together in that room. I'll supply the wine, we can get a facilitator and that discussion shouldn't cause the city anything. |
04:57:36.04 | Unknown | But I would actually, again, say that I'm in favor of absolutely not doing this, stopping this in its tracks, not rushing it in the next 45 days, but I am in favor of spending 25K or more on hiring the kind of cordial, meaningful facilitator to help bring the disparate parts of a community together with a plan that will actually save the partnership, not near-term, but for a hundred years. |
04:58:00.53 | Unknown | How do all the beautiful farmland up in Marin get saved? |
04:58:04.51 | Unknown | Is it because agriculture is the best in economic use of farmland? We know that's not the case. It's because of malt. It's because of malt, because of a quid pro quo deal. We could have a maritime land trust where property owners donate parts of their land in exchange for benefits. But here's the thing, they're not gonna donate their land if they don't win. We can't be, you know, we may not like it that some property owners are gonna win, but they're gonna win in this transaction if we want that. But we're gonna win too. The Marin ship is gonna win. |
04:58:34.06 | Unknown | You could set aside and endow Spalding Biltworks with a dowry that could help it last for a hundred years. |
04:58:42.29 | Unknown | that would preserve that area better than anything else. Ownership is the path to preservation, and that's a path that we can do. |
04:58:51.24 | Unknown | Sorry to be on my soapbox, but I actually want to say this because I want the community to come together instead of become a part. And this initiative will drive it apart. And I'm calling on people to come together in a framework to actually have a business plan. |
04:59:03.94 | Unknown | I love what Bob Silvestri presented a year ago to save the friendship for a hundred years. |
04:59:16.94 | Cox | I would like to, so I will share with you why I voted against Bob Silvestri. It was not because I was against urban planning. It was not because I was against the process. You mentioned that he worked with the working waterfront for three years. He then stopped and refused to further work with them because they had the temerity to reach out to meet with Carlo Berg. |
04:59:42.33 | Cox | without him. |
04:59:43.94 | Cox | And so I did not want to entrust the future of Sausalito's working waterfront with someone who's mercurial and lets personalities get in the way of process. And so that is why I voted against that. Also, he wanted to charge us $25,000 for work he had already performed, not for work he would prospectively perform. And so those are my personal reasons for voting against that. But I would absolutely like to see us engage in a multi-phased approach. I agree with Bruce Huff. |
05:00:17.87 | Cox | I have seen this be a ping pong ball, this issue be a ping pong ball for decades. I was appointed to the planning commission in 2008. The first question the city council asked me when interviewing me was, what are your views on the Marin ship? |
05:00:37.62 | Cox | I had to say, |
05:00:39.19 | Cox | The only thing I know about the marine ship is I volunteer at the Sausalito Art Festival there every year. I had lived here for 20 years and I didn't know anything about the controversy of the marine ship. |
05:00:49.58 | Cox | Um, |
05:00:51.29 | Cox | I am. |
05:00:51.88 | Cox | in 2012, four years later, I made a video, which you can still find online, about the importance of preserving the marine ship. But... |
05:01:02.46 | Cox | The various councils that I served on have differing views. This council adopted a housing element unanimously earlier this year. |
05:01:12.51 | Cox | And yet a couple of months ago, two council members started militating to change the housing element and add |
05:01:19.79 | Cox | housing in the marinship where we had voted not to. And so based on the composition of the city council, that's what determines the future of the marinship. |
05:01:33.68 | Cox | people have been calling me ever since this initiative was proposed and telling me I'm the swing vote, and I need to have the courage to act one way or the other. |
05:01:44.39 | Cox | It's not fair to put the future of the marineship on the shoulders of a single person. |
05:01:49.07 | Cox | It should be up to the people. |
05:01:52.19 | Cox | That being said, this measure, as currently written, is not the measure to bring to the people. That is why I'm in support of continuing this matter, whether it be to a meeting in July or whether it be to some future date. |
05:02:05.89 | Cox | um, |
05:02:06.90 | Cox | I hear what all of you have been saying about the importance of engagement and of... |
05:02:16.13 | Cox | stakeholder feedback. And I would never want us to adopt a measure that doesn't represent vetting. When I, as a council member in 2019 or 2018, adopted measures L and M that year, our BLT and our, and our TOT measures, we went out into the community. Those were city council sponsored measures that went onto the ballot and that were both adopted. But before we wrote them, and as part of writing them, we went out into the community and sought feedback. I went and spoke with business leaders about are they willing to accept an increase in the business license tax. I went to hoteliers and said are they willing to accept an increase in TOT. More of that work needs to be done for this measure. I don't know whether that can be accomplished in 30 days or not. |
05:03:20.16 | Cox | The reason I moved to continue this at the beginning of the meeting is that the proponents asked for a continuance to give them more time to address the significant community feedback that we've received. I would like to give them an opportunity to do that. I don't know whether we have the votes to do that tonight or not, but I just wanted to share my thoughts and perspective. |
05:03:42.55 | Cox | Thank you. |
05:03:44.17 | Kellerman | Thank you. Well said. My colleagues, you know, we are really lucky, fortunate council, because we somehow over the last year have managed to pick up so many issues that so many prior councils did not complete. And you can tell that this is a very friction-filled topic. Just by the way, the... |
05:04:07.26 | Kellerman | commentary began, right? There's just, you could feel that tension in the air. |
05:04:12.62 | Kellerman | And I, of course, echo the mayor's interest in being collaborative and open-minded as to this. It's fascinating to me because I sat here through a bid process, through a ferry landside process, through an SCA lease, and I heard all these arguments on the other side. And so it just seems that this is a community that feels strongly involved. |
05:04:34.58 | Kellerman | about the community and that's great. |
05:04:36.67 | Kellerman | This is exactly what democracy is about. This is exactly what we should be doing. My perspective on 45 years is actually much longer. |
05:04:45.39 | Kellerman | So if you'll just indulge me, in May 1989, we passed the Marinship Specific Plan. |
05:04:52.92 | Kellerman | In 2013, we had a Marinship Specific Plan steering committee. Many meetings went on the shelf. |
05:04:59.08 | Kellerman | In 2013, the Matthew Turner Kiel was set. |
05:05:02.39 | Kellerman | I include this in the timeline because the Matthew Turner would not have been built over the course of seven years had it not been for all of the individuals in the Marineship with those skills and those expertise. And that includes everybody in this room who participates in the Marineship, Reason Bradley and others who all came together, right? That type of unification. |
05:05:20.46 | Kellerman | In 2019, there was a general plan meeting where we included numerous policies that were intended to protect the ownership and that's in the land use. And I personally served on the general plan for three years and then served on a four person working group, working very, very hard. And why did I have to work so hard? Because in 2019, the city council at that time, which I was not a part, said that the marine ship specific plan will be superseded with the adoption of the city of South Seattle general plan update. |
05:05:47.24 | Kellerman | There was no public |
05:05:48.61 | Kellerman | voting on that. It didn't go to the voters. There was no CEQA on that particular decision. That council made that decision. |
05:05:58.01 | Kellerman | And so there's a history of this throughout. |
05:06:02.43 | Kellerman | At the end of the day, in 2023, we had a housing element that also talked about the marineship. We've been vetting these issues for a very long time. This is exactly the conversation that needs to happen. I think, Gwendolyn Dremor, you said it very well. We're not talking about saving the marineship. Let's talk about fixing it. Let's talk about investing in it. So many of our Clipper and KKMI and others are doing that. Let's talk about how that's working and what needs to be promoted and where we can make changes. Unfortunately, as a city, we do not enforce what we have down there right now. Many of you know a gentleman named Gary Testa. He had an incredible innovation. It was a coolant that reduced the, I think the energy consumption for servers by 40%. He had just raised a bunch of money. He was doing great. He was over off of Gate 5 Road. And then one day he gets a call, he's being evicted. |
05:06:52.76 | Kellerman | Somebody had come to him and offered three times rent that he was offering. |
05:06:56.60 | Kellerman | This was a steel, this was a three phase power, roll up doors, concrete floor, high ceilings, no bathroom, three times the amount. And what's there now? Something called the duct studio. |
05:07:08.80 | Kellerman | I believe it doesn't have a business license tax and it also doesn't look like sales tax off of it. |
05:07:16.51 | Kellerman | We haven't done our job. And so if you're wondering why we're here, it's because |
05:07:21.38 | Kellerman | All of you are right. |
05:07:23.29 | Kellerman | It's a yes and, right? We have to have this conversation. So, you know, I was told, when I looked at the Ferry Landsat, I was told it will create tax dollars. It will drive traffic. I didn't see an economic study on that, right? So a lot of this has to do with believing in the community and believing in the town. And we did, and we passed it. I can't remember if it was 4-1 or 5-0, but I voted for it. And so at the end of the day, this is a town that has had to take measures like 1022, like 1128, and put land use on the ballot. In fact, we're going to have to do that and put land use on the ballot again because of what the housing element requires. So it's not so unusual to have land use on the ballot. Those of you familiar with the process understand that. I think that this is exactly the conversation that we need to be having in light of all the hard work we've been doing. Hopefully this will come to a head. I support the Vice Mayor's suggestion that we continue the dialogue so that we can have the outreach for folks who currently feel that this measure misses the mark and so we can hear more from more people both in this room and in the marineship community. So I really appreciate you all staying to the |
05:08:27.52 | Kellerman | the late hour, this is exactly, I think, the way to democracy, to quote, that McDougall should work. |
05:08:36.36 | Blaustein | Thank you. And thank you to everyone for your passion and how much you care about this issue. I have to say this is one of the times sitting on the dais where I am |
05:08:47.26 | Blaustein | really moved by our community and how much you all care, whether it's on one side or the other, about the future of our community and what it looks like. And I really appreciate how much thought and perspective was brought forward. It means a lot. I appreciate the timeline that you brought up and I was reflecting on my, and you also shared your marineship history journey story. So I remember when I was running for city council, because I grew up in the community and went to Saucy University School and my parents are in Mill Valley and I walked the waterfront. I didn't really understand anything about the history of what the marineship was. It was just like the waterfront. I didn't see it as a separate area. And I, in 2017, when I was getting involved in the general plan and running for council for the first time, I went to a meeting specifically about the marineship and the general plan. And it had a lot of people sitting in this room here and it was at the bay model. And I remember one marineship property owner, but like, you're probably in the room and you'll be like, it was me. I won't remember whom. But we started talking and the general plan consultants came into the room and they were like, we're having this conversation so that we can talk about what the future of the Marin ship looks like together and have a conversation. And this property owner got up and said, we have already done that so many times. I am so frustrated. I'm leaving and just left the meeting. It was not Bruce Hoff. I know what you're thinking, but it was not Bruce Hoffman. |
05:10:13.07 | Blaustein | from the |
05:10:14.59 | Blaustein | And I remember being really like, what is going on? Why is everyone so upset about this? And I think this meeting is another example of that. And I appreciate so much that we all want to work collaboratively to find the right future for the Marin ship, because yes, we need to protect the working waterfront. And yes, we need a waterfront that works for Sausalito. And those two things are not mutually exclusive. And I really believe that we can find. |
05:10:40.14 | Blaustein | a path forward based on what people are saying in the room. I mean, it's not the same, the same dialogue that might've been had in 1988 when the marineship specific plan was passed. And I will note as well that the marineship specific plan was a decision made by city council and not by a ballot measure. And we're all holding onto it so tightly, but it was a city council decision. It's even mentioned in the ballot measure itself as a city council decision, even though the ballot measure is arguing that, |
05:11:05.60 | Blaustein | Dr. Jennifer L. against city council decision making, so I think there's a lot I don't want to pick it apart my my issue with the ballot measure before us is that. |
05:11:16.37 | Blaustein | we need to have more conversation and that if we want to have a ballot measure, given the risk associated with it, I'm in favor of signature gathering. However, I don't want to stop the discussion here. And so I would love to see a blue ribbon committee formed as suggested by, by mayor Sobieski. And if this group wants to go forward and follow the democratic process of gathering signatures, and then it comes back before us then, and make those changes in the timely manner as suggested, |
05:11:45.17 | Blaustein | that's something that, you know, then we would see it in that way. But right now, from the dais, I think it makes the most sense for us to |
05:11:53.48 | Blaustein | create a conversation that is ongoing about what, how we can effectively use the waterfront, but I don't think that this ballot initiative as, as vice mayor Cox pointed out serves that purpose. We deserve to have a conversation with all of the stakeholders in the room. And I appreciate that all of the stakeholders are here and I cannot, |
05:12:10.78 | Blaustein | given the context of how this came to us, that we didn't have the conversation and the signatures weren't gathered, supported continuing in this measure. So I'm more supportive of Mayor Soboski's suggestion to have a blue ribbon panel to consider and continue this discussion. |
05:12:20.24 | McDougall | THE FAMILY IS THE FAMILY |
05:12:20.28 | Cox | So whiskey. |
05:12:20.80 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
05:12:25.30 | Blaustein | Can I just make a comment? |
05:12:25.39 | Cox | Thank you. |
05:12:26.03 | Cox | make one of the things that |
05:12:26.30 | Blaustein | one more. |
05:12:26.74 | Cox | Thank you. |
05:12:27.01 | Cox | IT. |
05:12:27.41 | Cox | I do want to address the gathering of signatures versus an initiative by the city council. When someone goes out and gathers signatures, they bring us something. We have no choice in what it says. |
05:12:38.21 | Cox | When we sponsor an initiative, we get to make edits to it, and it becomes our own. And so the challenge with the cannabis initiatives at the last election were we had to take it. Once they got the signatures, we had no choice but to put it on the ballot. We had to either adopt it or put it on the ballot. We had no choice. We weren't able to dicker, negotiate, collaborate regarding the language. But we also weren't. |
05:13:05.10 | Blaustein | But we also weren't, but we weren't liable, right? So if there were CEQA issues or if something came up otherwise from a legal standpoint, or if there was an issue from one of the property owners who was unhappy with the text of it, the city itself, because it wasn't a city-sponsored initiative, would not take on the |
05:13:08.71 | Cox | ish. |
05:13:09.38 | Cox | or if something's wrong. |
05:13:11.05 | Cox | I agree. |
05:13:19.03 | Cox | liability. Agreed. So I just wanted to point out there are benefits to both ways. And I would love to see a collaborative process as opposed to a take it or leave it process. |
05:13:29.80 | Unknown | And for the record, I'm not opposed to something that eventually goes to the voters. That would be fine. Just not like this, not in 45 days. You know, again, I just say we just don't cut corners here. We let the process spell out. You know, so that's my biggest objection. And so, yeah, like, you know, I'll just say it. I don't know if anyone will show up and we can certainly change who the people, but I'll announce a Blue Ribbon committee. I will bring the wine, but I will also see if I can find a facilitator. I will not be facilitating it and won't be part of the committee. It'll just have the mayor's name on it, but I would invite John DeRay and Craig Mereless, Reason Bradley, Mike Linder, a representative clipper of Berg and Schoonmaker, Ethan Hirschfeld, someone from KQMI, John Kurtzweiler from ICB, and Leslie Allen from ICB. That's my starting list. That's my invitation. We could meet. And like I said, I put a structure around it with a facilitator. |
05:14:29.30 | Unknown | Let some trust be built and see if some bridges can be built. It won't be done in 45 days. It won't be done for this election, but it may get done and it may help save the partnership for a hundred years. |
05:14:42.46 | Kellerman | Well, I'm going to, just for sake of the record, make the motion that we continue it to July 16th. See if I have a second. If not, move on. |
05:14:49.70 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
05:14:50.53 | Kellerman | Second. |
05:14:52.00 | Unknown | motion made and seconded call the question that's uh all in favor |
05:14:57.20 | McDougall | Bye. Bye. |
05:14:58.93 | Unknown | opposed nay. |
05:14:59.64 | McDougall | Okay. |
05:15:01.21 | Unknown | So. |
05:15:01.50 | Unknown | That notion does not carry. |
05:15:03.79 | Unknown | So that's where we're at. We are with that as that is not continued. Nevertheless, there's a lot, a lot of interest parties are right here in the room that have been flushed up out of this. And I'm serious. I think there's a real opportunity. And as council member Kelman, |
05:15:23.96 | Unknown | Part of her motivation was to actually light a fire under this discussion. I was frustrated a year ago that we didn't because yeah, we may have turned down |
05:15:32.03 | Unknown | Mr. Silvestri, but what we didn't do is then try to find someone else. |
05:15:37.38 | Unknown | Right? But it was there. |
05:15:39.35 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:15:39.82 | Unknown | Council Member Blassey and I were two votes for it. So we could have found someone else. We could have just reissued the RFI. So let's reissue the RFI. I mean, that's a future agenda item thing, but we'd have to see if we can schedule it. And I'll call you in just a second, my colleague, my friend. But it was that we, you know, there's, you know, lots of mistakes were made. There are lots of opportunities missed. So I can do the blue ribbon thing, and that's a step, but I would call on my colleagues to consider and future genetimes. You can talk about scheduling it, issuing an RFI again for a more formal designer of some kind who can, like Silvestri or his ilk, help us. |
05:15:47.77 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
05:16:17.25 | Unknown | My friend. |
05:16:17.79 | Kellerman | Thank you, Mayor, and thank you for the offer. I gladly accept, serving on the Blue Ribbon Committee. So I think it's important |
05:16:25.64 | Kellerman | not to ignore the very reality. So a lot of you know I'm an environmental lawyer. I run a climate nonprofit. I do a lot of work in the blue economy in the U.S. and in Europe. We do a lot of work with working waterfronts. When I was the mayor, I launched a blue economy task force, and we actually worked very diligently with the port of Los Angeles and Alticea with an entity called Braid Theory, which is a world-renowned accelerator and incubator in the blue economy space. We had a business plan. We had investors interested. We had people who were creating a pipeline for cohort. It failed. You know why? We couldn't find space. The rents were just too high. And so I just want to make sure we're being realistic about what the ask is here right we we tried and there was a real hard due diligence effort on it and so I applaud and respect and thank you for your suggestion but I also want to just be super pragmatic about um why some things aren't working down there and it really is going to take uh |
05:17:21.70 | Sandra Bushmuth | We'll be right back. |
05:17:26.00 | Kellerman | You keep saying deals, but I gotta say there's gonna be |
05:17:28.63 | Kellerman | some things that need to be given up on that. So I give the two for perspective. |
05:17:33.07 | Unknown | I accept it. |
05:17:33.71 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
05:17:34.15 | Unknown | I'm inspired by malt. In the city, there are buildings that are bought for artists in a malt model. |
05:17:42.47 | Unknown | I'm sorry, I'm inspired by the agricultural land that's saved for worker and in a quote unquote sub economic activity, it can be done. I agree, it's a challenge. |
05:17:56.34 | Unknown | But I think it can be done. Malt's an example. In the city, there's a similar thing to malt, I'm forgetting the name, but it buys buildings. And in the arts, for artists, it buys the whole building. And it preserves it as a sub-economic use. I hate using that word because to me it's the highest economic use. It's just, you know, dollars and cents. And artists are saved. |
05:18:16.15 | Unknown | So it can be done. |
05:18:17.52 | Unknown | That's what the charge here is, to protect and enhance the marineship. And let's look at some of these solutions. That's the charge to us. |
05:18:25.04 | Unknown | Council member. |
05:18:25.74 | Blaustein | I was just going to say, we have to preserve those uses and those businesses because they're critical for the fabric of our community and who we are. And so I think we would all welcome solutions and ideas for how to do that, whether that's creating a protected area. |
05:18:41.68 | Blaustein | whether that's having conversations around shared investment, but |
05:18:44.82 | Blaustein | not having the space, with all due respect, yes, that's part of the problem, but it's hard to get investment in a space if the space itself is sinking and the infrastructure is failing. And I think we all know that the infrastructure is failing and it requires funding to fix that. And so I think there is a path forward that involves blue economy businesses. It involves public-private partnerships. It involves the entire ecosystem because everyone in this room is part of that ecosystem. And there's a future where we can all coexist in it and we can save those businesses with some sort of model similar. I appreciate the agricultural land trust idea because I think that that could be 100 years and we should be thinking about that. So I don't know if we need to keep talking, but I can. |
05:19:25.93 | Councilman McCullough | I want to give Councilor Cummings a blast. |
05:19:26.01 | Blaustein | I want to give Council Member a comment. |
05:19:26.98 | Kellerman | Oh, we've left. |
05:19:27.35 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
05:19:27.40 | Kellerman | Well, two things. So sea level rise vulnerability assessment is underway. I know a lot of you have been contacted in stakeholder groups. This is exactly the type of infrastructure investment. There's a lot of money out there for this. We just got $250,000 to take a hard look at Gate 5 Road. Again, we got a million dollars from the state to look at this. I'll continue to look for monies. We all will. But I'll also just issue my fellow council members a challenge. We have 400 houseboats in our sphere of influence and we currently have zero whole manufacturers in Sausalito to maintain and to make sure that those houseboats stay afloat. That is a built-in customer base. If we can't figure out how to bring that back to Sausalito, then we're really digging harder and maybe not doing our job. |
05:20:09.45 | Unknown | That should be a charge to the Blue Ribbon Committee. |
05:20:12.39 | Unknown | All right, we're gonna close item 5C, moving on to 5D. Thank you for having me. Receive and file, yeah, we're gonna receive and file the report regarding becoming a charter city, direction to staff to become a charter city. |
05:20:17.06 | Katie Thau Garcia | Y'all. |
05:20:23.37 | Unknown | Are we gonna- We're not gonna do it. |
05:20:25.35 | Unknown | Just following protocol, I imagine we're not, but we're gonna take public comment and probably continue to go. |
05:20:37.78 | Unknown | All right. |
05:20:38.34 | Unknown | I think we'll just, I think I'm presuming that we don't want to take these 5D up, so we're just going to do public comment on it. |
05:20:44.30 | Unknown | Okay. |
05:20:45.50 | Unknown | 5D public comment on yes, it will point them receive and file report regarding becoming a charter city provide direction to staff to become a charter city. we're going to continue this matter to a future agenda, but we have to take public comments of city clerk. |
05:20:59.00 | Mayor Sobieski | Fabette, do you want to speak? |
05:21:00.56 | McDougall | I do have a comment, but it's... |
05:21:04.45 | Unknown | Okay, that'll be in a few minutes, Ms. McDougal. |
05:21:07.40 | Mayor Sobieski | I see none. I see none. |
05:21:09.69 | Unknown | I do, we do need Councilmember Hoffman to vote on the next item, which is consider appointments to Parks and Rec Commission. |
05:21:19.60 | Unknown | She wasn't here. |
05:21:20.36 | Unknown | Let me find her. Hold on. |
05:21:48.39 | Unknown | Okay, so we want to go through the list. How many commissioners are we appointing? Does anyone know? Five? So I guess I can keep tabs of the people's top five, or how should we do that? |
05:22:00.76 | Kellerman | Want to do a slate? Okay, yeah. |
05:22:02.41 | Unknown | Okay, someone else count because my piece of paper is so marked up. |
05:22:04.61 | Kellerman | Why don't you start, Vice Mayor? |
05:22:07.91 | Kellerman | Yeah. |
05:22:08.91 | Karen Hollweg | Thank you. |
05:22:10.11 | Unknown | wait i'm trying to figure out how to do this are you going to count the votes |
05:22:12.55 | Karen Hollweg | Are you going to count the votes? |
05:22:14.51 | Unknown | I have my thing so messed up here. OK, sorry. |
05:22:19.15 | Unknown | I'll just read it off. |
05:22:20.32 | Karen Hollweg | Is that a bracket for me? |
05:22:22.73 | Unknown | OK, great. |
05:22:22.75 | Karen Hollweg | Thank you. |
05:22:22.76 | Councilman McCullough | Thank you. |
05:22:23.64 | Councilman McCullough | Right. |
05:22:24.57 | Karen Hollweg | Thank you. |
05:22:24.64 | Cox | So, I vote Sonia, Danielle. |
05:22:24.67 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:22:24.77 | Unknown | you |
05:22:24.81 | Karen Hollweg | you |
05:22:24.89 | Councilman McCullough | So. |
05:22:25.40 | Unknown | So yeah. |
05:22:25.88 | Councilman McCullough | Thank you. |
05:22:25.94 | Karen Hollweg | Thank you. |
05:22:29.48 | Cox | Karina Michelle Brand. |
05:22:32.60 | Unknown | Okay, Councilmember Hoffman. |
05:22:39.76 | Karina Hughes | but instead of |
05:22:40.35 | Unknown | Okay. |
05:22:41.87 | Karina Hughes | Same slate with my phone. Same slate. |
05:22:42.96 | Unknown | Same slate, so times two. Okay, I'll just like this. |
05:22:46.81 | Karina Hughes | What did you say? |
05:22:47.50 | Unknown | Councilmember Blastie. Abstain. Oh, sorry. And Councilmember Hoffman. |
05:22:48.35 | Unknown | to be able to do it. |
05:22:48.40 | Blaustein | Absolutely. |
05:22:52.82 | Unknown | Yes, I'll let you do that while I do my own camps. |
05:22:57.90 | Karen Hollweg | So |
05:22:58.78 | Karen Hollweg | Thank you. |
05:23:05.68 | Karen Hollweg | Thank you. |
05:23:05.69 | Sharna Brockett | Three of us. And things like |
05:23:08.29 | Unknown | Oh wow, this is like a winner. So I, that is. |
05:23:15.26 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:23:15.53 | Unknown | Well, that's right, right? |
05:23:15.55 | Unknown | Well, that's right, right? |
05:23:17.08 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:23:17.40 | Unknown | Because you have, okay, Dennis Banks. |
05:23:20.65 | Unknown | It won't make any difference, right? |
05:23:23.11 | Unknown | I can't do the math, it won't make any difference. |
05:23:25.10 | Unknown | I'm going to vote for Stacy. Yeah, that's right. So who are the... It's that slate is elected because you have three votes. It's Sonia. Sonia, Danielle, Karina, Michelle, and Frank. |
05:23:30.90 | Mayor Sobieski | though. |
05:23:35.14 | Unknown | Did you get that city clerk? |
05:23:36.73 | Mayor Sobieski | Sonia. |
05:23:37.62 | Unknown | Sonia Salzman, Danielle Keenan, uh, |
05:23:40.96 | Unknown | Karina Hughes, Michelle Mokala, and Frank Millian. |
05:23:46.31 | Cox | And may I just say in the event anyone is retarded enough to still be up, um, |
05:23:52.18 | Sammy | Thank you. |
05:23:52.24 | Blaustein | Um, |
05:23:52.57 | Sammy | Mm-hmm. |
05:23:53.16 | Cox | that it was a really difficult, we had, |
05:23:57.08 | Cox | amazing interviews and talent from everyone who interviewed this evening. So it was more difficult than it often is to. And I was so happy we were actually able to choose five. |
05:24:09.29 | Councilman Hoffman | Did we want to appoint an alternate? |
05:24:11.25 | Cox | Oh. |
05:24:12.69 | Councilman Hoffman | If you, |
05:24:12.97 | Cox | I would say let's appoint an alternate because the mayor had someone that he wanted to recommend that didn't get on the slate. |
05:24:21.24 | Unknown | How about Stacey Craig? |
05:24:24.16 | Cox | Okay. |
05:24:24.63 | Alice Merrill | Thank you. |
05:24:24.65 | Cox | Thank you. |
05:24:24.70 | Alice Merrill | you |
05:24:24.96 | Alice Merrill | Great. Sounds good. |
05:24:25.58 | Unknown | Stacy Cray is the alternate, Mr. City Clerk. Got it. Thanks for the suggestion, Councilmember Hoffman. |
05:24:31.17 | Unknown | All right, item 5. |
05:24:34.71 | Unknown | The, |
05:24:37.04 | Unknown | I'm sorry, 5F, introduction and waiver of first reading of ordinance 424 regarding relating to the residency requirements of cities, boards, and commissions, and committees. So do we want to take public? |
05:24:53.12 | Cox | I would like to move that we continue this, but I would like to hear any public comment this evening. |
05:24:57.86 | Unknown | you |
05:24:58.01 | Unknown | Public comment, please. |
05:24:59.51 | Unknown | Second, yeah, I think. |
05:25:01.10 | Mayor Sobieski | Robert M. McDougal. |
05:25:04.24 | Mayor Sobieski | Sorry, I missed the first and the second. |
05:25:06.28 | Unknown | It was Janelle and yeah. |
05:25:09.17 | McDougall | Thank you for allowing me. So just I'm glad that you're going to continue this if I understand correctly. Oh, sorry. |
05:25:15.56 | Unknown | Sorry, please go ahead. I'll keep talking for you two minutes. Let's go ahead. |
05:25:19.19 | McDougall | All right. Because I think making a broad sweeping statement about a residency requirement is not a good thing. Not in the best interest of Sausalito. |
05:25:30.78 | McDougall | and the people who live here, |
05:25:32.83 | McDougall | and make their business and home here. |
05:25:35.39 | McDougall | So what really is in the best interest is to look carefully. |
05:25:39.19 | McDougall | The fellow... |
05:25:40.30 | McDougall | with the end. |
05:25:42.02 | McDougall | where he doesn't live here, but he runs a long time running a good business here. |
05:25:47.14 | McDougall | that's the sort of special exception that should be made. |
05:25:51.20 | McDougall | But you don't throw down a blanket rule that said, it doesn't matter if you live here. It most certainly does matter. |
05:25:58.29 | McDougall | Thank you. |
05:25:59.83 | Mayor Sobieski | Thank you. |
05:26:00.20 | Mayor Sobieski | All right, we have Scott Thornburg. |
05:26:07.13 | Scott Thornburg | Thank you. I'll be brief and just say, I've said this before, but many of our businesses would love to contribute to the city of Sausalito, and this is a way for them to do that. We have many business owners that don't live in town, but have had... |
05:26:22.59 | Scott Thornburg | businesses here for many, many years. And they love Sausalito dearly and want to give back to the community. |
05:26:29.51 | Scott Thornburg | giving them an opportunity to serve, |
05:26:32.23 | Scott Thornburg | in a volunteer capacity seems like a great way to engage them |
05:26:36.82 | Scott Thornburg | And I think, you know, what what the former speaker just said of, you know, having some qualifications around that. |
05:26:43.87 | Scott Thornburg | I think that would be fine. But I do think we need to be careful |
05:26:48.04 | Scott Thornburg | not to be too restrictive there. |
05:26:50.01 | Scott Thornburg | There's already an interview process that we go through, a rigorous interview process with the city council. So I think that's probably enough. But we, you know, if you have a business in town and you want to volunteer, I think we should support that. So thank you for continuing to track on this matter. I think this has been on the agenda a few times now, but we definitely want to come to consensus soon. So thank you for your attention and looking forward to continuing this matter at a future agenda. |
05:27:21.69 | Mayor Sobieski | All right, no further publication. |
05:27:22.80 | Unknown | All right. We'll close that item. It's going to be continued. We'll move on now to items not on the agenda. This is your time to make comments on items not on the agenda. |
05:27:32.59 | Unknown | City Clerk, are there any people who wish to comment? My bet. Let's make Google. |
05:27:42.34 | McDougall | I don't know if you recall it, my very first time meeting you, I said, well, I'm a Southerner. I have an opinion on everything. |
05:27:49.43 | McDougall | So, all right, for this wrap up, I want to start with that risk assessment thing. |
05:27:53.72 | McDougall | When I got that phone call. |
05:27:55.86 | McDougall | following the last council meeting. |
05:27:57.87 | McDougall | from a watchdog who is a compliance officer |
05:28:01.31 | McDougall | which I gather is the same thing as risk assessment. They are always attorneys with rare exception. |
05:28:07.28 | McDougall | So that might color how we're going about trying to fill this position. |
05:28:11.30 | McDougall | And they're the ones that gave the briefing on how to argue the Title VII, for an example. |
05:28:16.72 | McDougall | I'm not interested in pursuing that. That was all new information for me. I just shared it as a matter of public record. |
05:28:22.15 | McDougall | That's the first item that I wanted to go over. The second has to do with the marine ship definition. I've got to say that I must take issue with having a marine ship discussion at the Spinnaker. No offense. I love the Spinnaker. Don't get me wrong. I love that room. But it should be inside the marine ship proper. |
05:28:40.07 | McDougall | Doreen and I were talking, you know, the most public meeting space to the south end of the proper marine ship is the cruising club. And we have very successfully orchestrated meetings at the cruising club. |
05:28:52.58 | McDougall | in the past. So it's an option. The Bay model is the best if they're still willing to do it. |
05:28:58.48 | McDougall | So that's the other thing. And then the third item that I wanted to... |
05:29:03.06 | McDougall | bring home here is strike while the iron is hot. What you got here tonight, thank God, was an open mind and discussion from both sides of the room about why people really care. And this is obviously an issue that is citywide. |
05:29:19.10 | McDougall | So everybody deserves to be noticed on the meetings and the special hearings, etc. |
05:29:24.13 | McDougall | So this is an important time to bring the citizens together, and what better time than right now? I wouldn't wait too long to push this forward. This marineship issue has been begging for attention. Thank you. |
05:29:39.32 | Unknown | Any other comments, city clerk? Yes, you may, of course, your public comment is open for items not on the agenda. |
05:29:46.46 | Unknown | But that's probably it. |
05:29:47.74 | Alice Merrill | Is if I say that about the Marin ship, the fact that I'm not sure |
05:29:53.17 | Alice Merrill | still that people on the hill even know where it is so i i really think that somehow we've got to get people down there one time there was a um there was a all city potluck it was for it was for the sister cities i thought that can't happen how are they going to do that all city potluck great idea |
05:30:03.84 | Katie Thau Garcia | Thank you. |
05:30:19.19 | Alice Merrill | Well, it happened. I went. And it was fun. It was a lot of people. It was a perfect amount of food. It worked. It worked. |
05:30:27.24 | Alice Merrill | It can happen that people can be brought down there and |
05:30:31.36 | Alice Merrill | and can learn in one way or another. And I've always thought that it would be fun to have all the business, all the owners have a, have a day that, you know, come on down and make it big deal that you come on down and you find out about what's there and you peek into all these little places and, |
05:30:50.53 | Alice Merrill | We have to get the rest of the town to care, or this is just, you know, it's the landowners against the renters, and it's terrible. |
05:31:06.44 | Alice Merrill | Let's figure out a way to get people down there. |
05:31:09.90 | Alice Merrill | I'm going to go home now. I'm sorry. Thank you. |
05:31:12.37 | Blaustein | Wish we could too, Alice. |
05:31:13.67 | Alice Merrill | right? |
05:31:13.72 | Unknown | Remember, Steve. |
05:31:14.87 | Unknown | Anyone else, Mr. City Clerk? See you then. |
05:31:17.08 | Unknown | All right, city manager, it's time for your, oh, I'm sorry, council member committee reports. No? |
05:31:22.12 | Unknown | No, that's a businessman. |
05:31:24.08 | Cox | I attended my first pedestrian and bicycle advisory committee meeting as city council liaison last night. And there are a number of grant funding opportunities that are going, that are being pursued and recommended. |
05:31:41.22 | Cox | that the PBAC is going to recommend that the city council |
05:31:44.70 | Cox | consider as well as |
05:31:46.78 | Cox | Um, |
05:31:47.69 | Cox | The adoption of a plan by parametrics for avoiding accidents at the most, at the hottest intersections throughout the city. So both of those things will be coming to the city council, if not in July, early in the fall. And I look forward to the entire council having an opportunity to hear more about them. |
05:32:09.17 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:32:09.20 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
05:32:09.32 | Unknown | I'm not sure. |
05:32:09.41 | Cox | Thank you. |
05:32:10.10 | Cox | I'm not sure. |
05:32:10.50 | Kellerman | What day is our CalCities? In July, Sassilito is the host for the North Bay Division of CalCities. There's a luncheon. |
05:32:17.81 | Kellerman | I think it's July 25th, is that that, Thursday? And it'll be a spinnaker. It's being a spinnaker. So they're expecting about 60 people. Everybody here, of course, is invited. |
05:32:29.18 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:32:30.13 | Kellerman | Lunch, so probably noon. |
05:32:32.78 | Unknown | You fine? |
05:32:33.98 | Kellerman | No, but CalCities is. |
05:32:35.14 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
05:32:35.21 | Kellerman | Thank you. |
05:32:36.08 | Unknown | All right. City manager, would you have any reports? |
05:32:40.79 | Unknown | Thank you, Mayor and members of the council. This is forever on tape. I want to say there's a robust quarterly report from the city manager that was compiled by our intern, Libby Hughes. So it's got a lot of information in different departments, including the next work that she's going to do for me, which is to do an evaluation of our stairways and the condition of our stairways. And then secondly, she'll do some work related to bridgeway and some of the clutter that's on bridgeway, but she's done a great job. The department's obviously contributed to this information and that concludes my report. |
05:33:17.77 | Unknown | Thank you, sir. |
05:33:18.51 | Unknown | uh, |
05:33:18.76 | Unknown | So. |
05:33:18.86 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:33:19.18 | Cox | May I just commend the city manager? That was a really impressive report, and there's been a lot getting done, even while putting out a bunch of fires. So kudos. |
05:33:30.98 | Kellerman | Will she respond to your emails and clear your inbox for you? |
05:33:37.93 | Unknown | Do my colleagues have any additional future agenda items? |
05:33:40.73 | Blaustein | I just, I've mentioned this at almost every meeting, and it's still not on the future agenda items list. I keep bringing up tabletop exercises and also disaster preparedness presentation from Mike McKinley. And I know that other members of the council have also asked for that, including Councilmember Hoffman, Councilmember Kelman, and Vice Mayor Cox. So again... |
05:33:56.61 | Sammy | So again, |
05:33:57.47 | Unknown | . |
05:33:58.17 | Blaustein | I would really like us to have a robust conversation about disaster preparedness, have a presentation from our emergency manager, have more tabletops. I'm going to keep pushing that. |
05:34:05.02 | Unknown | to keep pushing that. Can you please make sure we look at specifically that on our next agenda setting? That request, Mr. City Clerk? Just because I keep missing it too. It's not your point. |
05:34:13.94 | Cox | Yeah, so can we just, does the city clerk write down when we say what future agenda items we'd like to have? |
05:34:18.87 | Mayor Sobieski | Yes, I do. And it's on the future agenda sheet that's part of the agenda setting meeting. |
05:34:23.43 | Unknown | Maybe remind us. |
05:34:23.46 | Mayor Sobieski | you |
05:34:23.51 | Mayor Sobieski | maybe remind us. |
05:34:24.31 | Mayor Sobieski | I'm not part of those meetings. Oh, that's right. That's right. |
05:34:25.79 | Unknown | Oh, that's right. That's right. It's our fault. |
05:34:27.39 | Mayor Sobieski | Bye. |
05:34:27.41 | Cox | Well, can you just start emailing me that list with the matrix every time the agenda setting committee meets so that we can start populating that? |
05:34:36.46 | Mayor Sobieski | Yes, I already do that. Okay, all right. |
05:34:38.21 | Blaustein | Right. It's just on the current future agenda items. It's not listed there. |
05:34:41.31 | Unknown | Well, |
05:34:41.79 | Blaustein | Thank you. |
05:34:41.89 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:34:41.90 | Cox | Thank you. |
05:34:42.40 | Blaustein | But that's fine. |
05:34:43.31 | Unknown | Be the squeaky, keep being squeaky, we all apologize. Thank you. All right, public comment, please, on these committee reports, city manager report, future agenda items. Any public comment? |
05:34:51.73 | Reason Bradley | it. |
05:34:52.32 | Unknown | No. |
05:34:54.95 | McDougall | or |
05:34:55.03 | McDougall | as a result. |
05:34:55.07 | Unknown | Okay. |
05:34:55.29 | McDougall | Good job. |
05:34:55.96 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:34:56.49 | Unknown | Ms. Bushmaker. |
05:34:57.73 | Unknown | There's- |
05:34:58.44 | Unknown | as Bushmaker has said. |
05:34:58.71 | Mayor Sobieski | Especially. |
05:34:59.22 | Mayor Sobieski | Sandra Bushmaker. |
05:34:59.46 | Unknown | Thank you. |
05:35:03.42 | Sandra Bushmuth | Here we go. I just wanted to remind you that Dorothy Westby Gibson |
05:35:07.74 | Sandra Bushmuth | the Gibson house, wrote a book about the stairways of Sausalito. And so your staff person, your intern, |
05:35:16.04 | Sandra Bushmuth | City Manager might find that to be helpful way to start her endeavor. |
05:35:22.88 | Unknown | Thank you for that. One of my treasures is a signed copy of that. |
05:35:27.47 | Unknown | or Ms. Gibson herself, so... |
05:35:29.54 | Sandra Bushmuth | She took me around the city and walked me up and down all those stairs when I was running for council 26 years ago. |
05:35:37.10 | Unknown | Fantastic. |
05:35:38.60 | Unknown | All right. That's it. We will now adjourn. The next city council meeting is on July 16th at 7pm. See you then and happy... |
05:35:44.07 | Cox | No, it's not the 20th. The next to the 20th. Oh, jeez. |
05:35:44.90 | Blaustein | the 20 minutes. |
05:35:46.00 | Unknown | Oh. |
05:35:48.44 | Unknown | Thank you. The next city council meeting is a special city council meeting where we will approve and adopt the budget. It is one week from today. |
05:35:50.11 | Cox | Yeah. |
05:35:54.84 | Doreen Gunnar | At 6 p.m. |
05:35:55.48 | Unknown | 6 p.m., not at 7 p.m. |
05:35:57.52 | Unknown | 6 p.m. It is at 6 p.m. And then we'll go out in currents as well. Thanks for the catch. And you guys are sharp for this late at night. Thanks for catching my Eric. |
05:36:04.68 | Unknown | uh, |
05:36:05.69 | Unknown | Good night. |
05:36:08.96 | Unknown | of |